Marine Biology

, Volume 84, Issue 2, pp 189–195 | Cite as

The light environment in a giant kelp forest: influence of Macrocystis pyrifera on spatial and temporal variability

  • V. A. Gerard
Article

Abstract

Quantum irradiance was measured at several depths in forests of the giant kelp Macrocystis pyrifera (L.) C. Agardh in southern California, USA, during the summer of 1983. The greatest reduction in irradiance occurred in the uppermost 1 m of the water column, where the floating portions of kelp fronds formed surface canopies with high blade densities. Average irradiances low enough to limit macroalgal photosynthesis (<200 μE m-2 s-1) were recorded at 1 m depth below dense kelp canopies under sunny surface conditions. Light penetration was exponentially related to canopy density, but was higher than predicted from transmission through individual kelp blades dae to the heterogeneous distribution of canopy tissue. Light penetration was considerably lower immediately adjacent to an individual kelp plant than in the interplant spaces, indicating significant self-shading. Spatial and temporal variability in both irradiance and light penetration were highest just below the canopy and decreased with increasing depth. Sunflecks (>200 μE m-2 s-1), ranging from <1 to 60s or more in duration, composed a considerable proportion of total irradiance at 1 m depth, even during recordings with low average irradiances. These fluctuations probably affect photosynthetic efficiency of kelp tissues within and just below the canopy. Predictions of kelp productivity based on irradiances averaged over hours or days and on photosynthetic parameters determined under laboratory conditions may be inaccurate, due to the spatial and temporal variability characteristic of the kelp forest light-environment.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. Acock, B., J. H. M. Thornly and J. W. Wilson: Spatial variation of light in the canopy. In: Prediction and measurement of photosynthetic productivity, pp 91–102. Ed. by C. T. de Wit. Wageningen: Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation 1970Google Scholar
  2. Barrales, H. L. and C. S. Lobban: The comparative ecology of Macrocystis pyrifera, with emphasis on the forests of Chubut, Argentina. J. Ecol. 63, 657–677 (1975)Google Scholar
  3. Dayton, P. K., V. Currie, T. Gerrodette, B. Keller, R. Rosenthal and D. V. Tresca: Patch dynamics and stability of southern California kelp communities. Ecol. Monogr. 54, 253–289 (1984)Google Scholar
  4. Dayton, P. K. and M. J. Tegner: Catastrophic storms, El Niño, and patch stability in a southern California kelp community. Science, N.Y. 224, 283–285 (1984)Google Scholar
  5. Duncan, M. J. and P. J. Harrison: Comparison of solvents for extracting chlorophylls from marine macrophytes. Botanica mar. 25, 445–447 (1982)Google Scholar
  6. Federer, C. A. and C. B. Tanner: Spectral distribution of light in the forest. Ecology 47, 555–560 (1966)Google Scholar
  7. Foster, M. S.: Regulation of algal community development in a Macrocystis pyrifera forest. Mar. Biol. 32, 331–342 (1975)Google Scholar
  8. Gaudillere, J. P.: Effect of periodic oscillations of artificial light emission on photosynthetic activity. Physiologia Pl. 41, 95–98 (1977)Google Scholar
  9. Gay, L. W., K. R. Knoerr and M. O. Braaten: Solar radiation variability on the floor of a pine plantation. Agric. Meteorology (Amsterdam) 8, 39–50 (1971)Google Scholar
  10. Gerard, V. A.: Some aspects of material dynamics and energy flow in a kelp forest in Monterey Bay, California, 173 pp. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Santa Cruz 1976Google Scholar
  11. Gerard, V. A.: Physiological effects of El Niño on giant kelp in southern California. Mar. Biol. Lett. (In press) (1984)Google Scholar
  12. Gross, L. J.: Photosynthetic dynamics in varying light environments: a model and its application to whole leaf carbon gain. Ecology 63, 84–93 (1982)Google Scholar
  13. Gross, L. J. and B. F. Chabot: Time course of photosynthetic response to changes in incident light energy. Pl. Physiol., Baltimore, Md 63, 1033–1038 (1979)Google Scholar
  14. Hatfield, J. L. and R. E. Carlson: Spectral and photosynthetically active radiation transmission patterns within soybean canopies. Iowa St. J. Res. 55, 47–60 (1980)Google Scholar
  15. Heine, J. N.: Seasonal productivity of two red algae in a central California kelp forest. J. Phycol. 19, 146–152 (1983)Google Scholar
  16. Horn, H. S.: The adaptive geometry of trees, 144 pp. Princeton: Princeton University Press 1971Google Scholar
  17. Hutchison, B. A. and D. R. Matt: The distribution of solar radiation within a deciduous forest. Ecol. Monogr. 47, 185–207 (1977)Google Scholar
  18. Jackson, G. A. and C. D. Winant: Effect of a kelp forest on coastal currents. Contin. Shelf Res. 2, 75–80 (1983)Google Scholar
  19. Kriedemann, P. E., E. Torokfalvy and R. E. Smart: Natural occurrence and utilisation of sunflecks by grapevine leaves. Photosynthetica (Praha, Czechoslovakia) 7, 18–27 (1973)Google Scholar
  20. Loomis, W. E.: Absorption of radiant energy by leaves. Ecology 46, 14–17 (1965)Google Scholar
  21. Lüning, K.: Light. In: The biology of seaweeds, pp 326–355. Ed. by C. S. Lobban and M. J. Wynn. Berkeley: University of California Press 1981Google Scholar
  22. Marra, J.: Effect of short-term variations in light intensity on photosynthesis of a marine phytoplankter: a laboratory simulation study. Mar. Biol. 46, 191–202 (1978)Google Scholar
  23. McFarland, W. N. and E. R. Loew: Wave produced changes in underwater light and their relations to vision. Envir. Biol. Fish. 8, 173–184 (1983)Google Scholar
  24. McFarland, W. N. and J. Prescott: Standing crop, chlorophyll content and in situ metabolism of a giant kelp community in southern California. Publs Inst. mar. Sci. Univ. Tex. 6, 109–132 (1959)Google Scholar
  25. Monsi, M., Z. Uchijima and T. Oikawa: Structure of foliage canopies and photosynthesis. A. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 4, 301–327 (1973)Google Scholar
  26. Monteith, J. L.: Light distribution and photosynthesis in field crops. Ann. Bot. 29, 17–37 (1965)Google Scholar
  27. Neushul, M.: Submarine illumination in Macrocystis beds. Beih. Nova Hedwigia 32, 241–254 (1971)Google Scholar
  28. Newton, J. E. and G. E. Blackman: The penetration of solar radiation through leaf canopies of different structure. Ann. Bot. 34, 329–349 (1970)Google Scholar
  29. Pearse, J. S. and A. H. Hines: Expansion of a central California kelp forest following the mass mortality of sea urchins. Mar. Biol. 51, 83–91 (1979)Google Scholar
  30. Pollard, D. F. W.: The effect of rapidly changing light on the rate of photosynthesis in largetooth aspen (Populus grandidentata). Can. J. Bot. 48, 823–829 (1970)Google Scholar
  31. Ramus, J.: A physiological test of the theory of complementary chromatic adaptation. II. Brown, green and red seaweeds. J. Phycol. 19, 173–178 (1983)Google Scholar
  32. Reed, D. C. and M. S. Foster: The effects of canopy shading on algal recruitment and growth in a giant kelp forest. Ecology 65, 937–948 (1984)Google Scholar
  33. Reifsnyder, W. E., G. M. Furnival and J. L. Horowitz: Spatial and temporal distribution of solar radiation beneath forest canopies. Agric. Meteorology (Amsterdam) 9, 21–37 (1971)Google Scholar
  34. Rosenthal, R. J., W. D. Clarke and P. K. Dayton: Ecology and natural history of a stand of giant kelp, Macrocystis pyrifera, off Del Mar. California. Fish. Bull. U.S. 72, 670–684 (1974)Google Scholar
  35. Santelices, B. and F. P. Ojeda: Effects of canopy removal on the understory algal community structure of coastal forests of Macrocystis pyrifera from southern South America. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 14, 165–173 (1984a)Google Scholar
  36. Santelices, B. and F. P. Ojeda: Population dynamics of coastal forests of Macrocystis pyrifera in Puerto Toro, Isla Navarino, southern Chile. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 14, 175–183 (1984b)Google Scholar
  37. Schenck, H. Jr.: On the focusing of sunlight by ocean waves. J. opt. Soc. Am. 47, 653–657 (1957)Google Scholar
  38. Sinclair, T. R. and E. R. Lemon: The distribution of 660 and 730 nm radiation in corn canopies. Sol. Energy 15, 89–97 (1973)Google Scholar
  39. Towle, D. W. and J. S. Pearse: Production of the giant kelp Macrocystis, estimated by in situ incorporation of 14C in polyethylene bags. Limnol. Oceanogr. 18, 155–159 (1973)Google Scholar
  40. Walsh, P. and L. Legendre: Photosynthesis of natural phytoplankton under high frequency light fluctuations simulating those induced by sea surface waves. Limnol. Oceanogr. 28, 688–697 (1983)Google Scholar
  41. Wheeler, W. N.: Pigment content and photosynthetic rate of the fronds of Macrocystis pyrifera. Mar. Biol. 56, 97–102 (1980)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. A. Gerard
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Kerckhoff Marine LaboratoryCalifornia Institute of TechnologyCorona del MarUSA
  2. 2.Marine Sciences Research CenterState University of New YorkStony BrookUSA

Personalised recommendations