, Volume 177, Issue 2, pp 185–197 | Cite as

Gravitropism in a starchless mutant of Arabidopsis

Implications for the starch-statolith theory of gravity sensing
  • Timothy Caspar
  • Barbara G. Pickard


The starch-statolith theory of gravity reception has been tested with a mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. which, lacking plastid phosphoglucomutase (EC activity, does not synthesize starch. The hypocotyls and seedling roots of the mutant were examined by light and electron microscopy to confirm that they did not contain starch. In upright wild-type (WT) seedlings, starch-filled plastids in the starch sheath of the hypocotyl and in three of the five columellar layers of the root cap were piled on the cell floors, and sedimented to the ceilings when the plants were inverted. However, starchless plastids of the mutant were not significantly sedimented in these cells in either upright or inverted seedlings. Gravitropism of light-grown seedling roots was vigorous: e.g., 10o curvature developed in mutants rotated on a clinostat following a 5 min induction at 1 · g, compared with 14o in the WT. Curvatures induced during intervals from 2.5 to 30 min were 70% as great in the mutant as the WT. Thus under these conditions the presence of starch and the sedimentation of plastids are unnecessary for reception of gravity by Arabidopsis roots. Gravitropism by hypocotyls of light-grown seedlings was less vigorous than that by roots, but the mutant hypocotyls exhibited an average of 70–80% as much curvature as the WT. Roots and hypocotyls of etiolated seedlings and flower stalks of mature plants were also gravitropic, although in these cases the mutant was generally less closely comparable to the WT. Thus, starch is also unnecessary for gravity reception in these tissues.

Key words

Amyloplast Arabidopsis Gravitropism Mutant (gravitropism) Phosphoglucomutase Starch Statolith 



photosynthetically active radiation


periodic acid-Schiff's reagent






Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Audus, L.J. (1962) The mechanism of the perception of gravity by plants. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol. 16, 197–226Google Scholar
  2. Audus, L.J. (1975) Geotropism in roots. In: Development and function of roots, pp. 327–363, Torrey, J.G., Clarkson, D.T., eds. Academic Press, London New York San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  3. Barlow, P.B. (1974) Recovery of geotropism after removal of the root cap. J. Exp. Bot. 25, 1137–1146Google Scholar
  4. Caspar, T., Huber, S.C., Somerville, C.R. (1985a) Alterations in growth, photosynthesis, and respiration in a starchless mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) deficient in chloroplast phosphoglucomutase activity. Plant Physiol. 79, 11–17Google Scholar
  5. Caspar, T., Somerville, C.R., Pickard, B.G. (1985b) Geotropic roots and shoots of a starch-free mutant of Arabidopsis. (Abstr.) Plant Physiol. 77, Suppl., 105Google Scholar
  6. Clifford, P.E. (1979) Amyloplast movement and the geotropic response. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 91, 69–74Google Scholar
  7. Clifford, P.E., Barclay, G.F. (1980) The sedimentation of amyloplasts in living statocytes of the dandelion flower stalk. Plant Cell Environ. 3, 381–386Google Scholar
  8. Dolk, H.E. (1936) Geotropism and the growth substance. Rec. Trav. Bot. Néerl. 33, 509–585Google Scholar
  9. Feder, N., O'Brien, T.P. (1968) Plant microtechnique: some principles and new methods. Am. J. Bot. 55, 123–142Google Scholar
  10. Feldman, L.J. (1985) Root gravitropism. Physiol. Plant. 65, 341–344Google Scholar
  11. Filner, B., Hertel, R., Steele, C., Fan, V. (1970) Some aspects of geotropism in coleoptiles. Planta 94, 333–354Google Scholar
  12. Grenville, D.J., Peterson, R.L. (1981) Structure of aerial and subterranean roots of Selaginella kraussiana A. Br. Bot. Gaz. 142, 73–81Google Scholar
  13. Haughn, G.W., Somerville, C.R. (1986) Sulfonylurea-resistant mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Gen. Genet. 204, 430–434Google Scholar
  14. Hertel, R., Dela Fuente, R.K., Leopold, A.C. (1969) Geotropism and the lateral transport of auxin in the corn mutant amylomaize. Planta 88, 204–214Google Scholar
  15. Hillman, S.K., Wilkins, M.B. (1982) Gravity perception in decapped roots of Zea mays. Planta 155, 267–271Google Scholar
  16. Iversen, T.-H. (1969) Elimination of geotropic responsiveness in roots of cress (Lepidium sativum) by removal of statolith starch. Physiol. Plant. 22, 1251–1262Google Scholar
  17. Iversen, T.-H., Larsen, P. (1973) Movement of amyloplasts in the statocytes of geotropically stimulated roots. The preinversion effect. Physiol. Plant. 28, 172–181Google Scholar
  18. Jackson, M.B., Barlow, P.W. (1981) Root geotropism and the role of growth regulators from the cap: a re-examination. Plant Cell Environ. 4, 107–123Google Scholar
  19. Johnsson, A., Pickard, B.G. (1979) The threshold stimulus for geotropism. Plant. Physiol. 45, 315–319Google Scholar
  20. Juniper, B.E. (1976) Geotropism. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 27, 385–406Google Scholar
  21. Kiss, J.Z., Hertel, R., Sack, F.D. (1989) Amyloplasts are necessary for full gravitropic sensitivity in roots of Arabidopsis thaliana. Planta 177, 198–206Google Scholar
  22. Klomparens, K.L., Flegler, S.L., Hooper, G.R. (1986) Procedures for transmission and scanning electron microscopy for biological and medical science. A laboratory manual, 2nd edn. Ladd Research Industries, Burlington, Vt., USAGoogle Scholar
  23. Langhaar, H.L. (1951) Dimensional analysis and theory of models. John Wiley and Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Larsen, P. (1957) The development of geotropic and spontaneous curvatures in roots. Physiol. Plant. 10, 127–163Google Scholar
  25. Larsen, P. (1971) The susception of gravity by higher plants. In: Gravity and the organism, pp. 73–87, Gordon, S.A., Cohen, M.J., eds. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  26. Lin, T.P., Caspar, T., Somerville, C.R., Preiss, J. (1988) Isolation and characterization of a starchless mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. lacking ADPglucose pyrophosphorylase activity. Physiol. Plant. 86, 1131–1135Google Scholar
  27. Mackinney, G. (1941) Absorption of light by chlorophyll solutions. J. Biol. Chem. 140, 315–322Google Scholar
  28. Miles, D. (1981) The relationship of geotropic response and statolith in a nuclear mutant of maize. (Abstr.) Physiol. Plant. 67, Suppl., 100Google Scholar
  29. Mirza, J.L., Olsen, G.M., Iversen, T.-H., Maher, E.P. (1984) The growth and gravitropic responses of wild-type and auxin-resistant mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana. Physiol. Plant. 60, 516–522Google Scholar
  30. Moore, R. (1987) Root gravitropism in a cultivar of Zea mays whose columella cells contain starch-deficient amyloplasts. Ann. Bot. 59, 661–666Google Scholar
  31. Moore, R., Evans, M.L. (1986) How roots perceive and respond to gravity. Am. J. Bot. 73, 574–587Google Scholar
  32. Olsen, G.M., Mirza, J.I., Maher, P., Iversen, T.-H. (1984) Ultrastructure and movements of cell organelles in the root cap of agravitropic mutants and normal seedlings of Arabidopsis thaliana. Physiol. Plant. 60, 523–531Google Scholar
  33. Perbal, G., Rivière, S. (1976) Relation entre réaction géotropique et évolution du statenchyme dans la racine d'Asperge. Physiol. Plant. 38, 39–47Google Scholar
  34. Pickard, B.G. (1971) The susception of gravity by higher plants: analysis of geotonic data for theories of georeception. In: Gravity and the organism, pp. 89–96, Gordon, S.A., Cohen, M.J., eds. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  35. Pickard, B.G. (1973) Geotropic response patterns of the Avena coleoptile. I. Dependence on angle and duration of stimulation. Can. J. Bot. 51, 1003–1021Google Scholar
  36. Pickard, B.G., Thimann, K.V. (1966) Geotropic response of wheat coleoptiles in absence of amyloplast starch. J. Gen. Physiol. 49, 1065–1086Google Scholar
  37. Pierce, J.W., McCurry, S.D., Mulligan, R.M., Tolbert, N.E. (1982) Activation and assay of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase. Methods Enzymol. 89, 47–55Google Scholar
  38. Quail, P.H. (1979) Plant cell fractionation. Annu. Rev. Plant. Physiol. 30, 425–484Google Scholar
  39. Reynolds, E.S. (1963) The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electron opaque stain in electron microscopy. J. Cell. Biol. 17, 208–212Google Scholar
  40. Roberts, J.A. (1984) Tropic responses of hypocotyls from normal tomato plants and the agravitropic mutant Lazy-1. Plant Cell Environ. 7, 515–520Google Scholar
  41. Sack, F.D., Suyemoto, M.M., Leopold, A.C. (1984) Kinetics of amyloplast sedimentation in gravistimulated maize coleoptiles. Planta 161, 459–464Google Scholar
  42. Shen-Miller, J., Hinchman, R.R. (1974) Gravity sensing in plants: a critique of the statolith theory. BioScience 24, 643–651Google Scholar
  43. Somerville, C.R., Somerville, S.C., Ogren, W.L. (1981) Isolation of photosynthetically active protoplasts and chloroplasts from A. thaliana. Plant Sci. Lett. 21, 89–96Google Scholar
  44. Stitt, M., Bulpin, P.V., ap Rees, T. (1978) Pathway of starch breakdown in photosynthetic tissues of Pisum sativum. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 544, 200–214Google Scholar
  45. Volkmann, D., Sievers, A. (1979) Graviperception in multicellular organisms. In: Encyclopedia of plant physiology, N.S., vol. 7: Physiology of movements, pp. 573–600, Haupt, W., Feinleib, M.E., eds. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  46. Wendt, M., Sievers, A. (1986) Restitution of polarity in statocytes from centrifuged roots. Plant Cell Environ. 9, 17–23Google Scholar
  47. Weibel, W.R., Bolender, R.P. (1972) Stereological techniques for electron microscopic morphometry. In: Principles and techniques of electron microscopy: biological applications, vol. 3, pp. 239–296, Hayat, M.A., ed. van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  48. Westing, A.H. (1971) A case against statoliths. In: Gravity and the organism, pp. 97–104, Gordon, S.A., Cohen, M.J., eds., University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  49. Wilkins, M.B. (1984) Gravitropism. In: Advanced plant physiology, pp. 163–185, Wilkins, M.B., ed., Pitman, LondonGoogle Scholar
  50. Wright, M. (1986) The acquisition of gravisensitivity during the development of nodes of Avena fatua. J. Plant Growth Regul. 5, 37–47Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Timothy Caspar
    • 1
  • Barbara G. Pickard
    • 2
  1. 1.MSU-DOE Plant Research LaboratoryMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA
  2. 2.Biology DepartmentWashington UniversitySt. LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations