Marine Biology

, Volume 92, Issue 4, pp 557–562 | Cite as

A new method for detecting pollution effects on marine macrobenthic communities

  • R. M. Warwick


A method is described by which the pollution status of a marine macrobenthic community may be assessed without reference to a temporal or spatial series of control samples. Theoretical considerations suggest that the distribution of numbers of individuals among species should behave differently from the distribution of biomass among species when influenced by pollution-induced disturbance. Combined k-dominance plots for species biomass and numbers take three possible forms representing unpolluted, moderately polluted and grossly polluted conditions, one curve acting as an “internal control” against which the other can be compared. Field data from unpolluted communities and from a well documented temporal pollution gradient support the model, but further empirical testing is required.


Biomass Control Sample Internal Control Field Data Theoretical Consideration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. Buchanan, J. B. and R. M. Warwick: An estimate of benthic macrofauna production in the offshore mud of the Northumberland coast. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 54, 197–222 (1974)Google Scholar
  2. Connell, J. H.: Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Science, N.Y. 199, 1302–1310 (1978)Google Scholar
  3. Gee, J. M., R. M. Warwick, M. Schaanning, J. A. Berge and W. G. Ambrose: Effects of organic enrichment on meiofaunal abundance and community structure in sublittoral soft sediments. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 91, 247–262 (1985)Google Scholar
  4. Gray, J. S.: Pollution-induced changes in populations. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. (Ser. B) 286, 545–561 (1979)Google Scholar
  5. Gray, J. S.: Detecting pollution induced changes in communities using the log-normal distribution of individuals among species. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 12, 173–176 (1981)Google Scholar
  6. Gray, J. S. and F. B. Mirza: A possible method for detecting pollution induced disturbance on marine benthic communities. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 10, 142–146 (1979)Google Scholar
  7. Hughes, R. G.: A hypothesis concerning the influence of competition and stress on the structure of marine benthic communities. Proc. 19th Eur. mar. Biol. Symp. 391–400 (1985). (Ed. by P. E. Gibbs. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
  8. Huston, M.: A general hypothesis of species diversity. Am. Nat. 113, 81–101 (1979)Google Scholar
  9. Lambshead, P. J. D. The nematode/copepod ratio. Some anomalous results from the Firth of Clyde. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 15, 256–259 (1984)Google Scholar
  10. Lambshead, P. J. D. and H. M. Platt: Structural patterns of marine benthic assemblages and their relationship with empirical statistical models. Proc. 19th Eur. mar. Biol. Symp. 371–380 (1985). (Ed. by P. E. Gibbs. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
  11. Lambshead, P. J. D., H. M. Platt and K. M. Shaw: The detection of differences among assemblages of marine benthic species based on an assessment of dominance and diversity. J. nat. Hist. 17, 859–874 (1983)Google Scholar
  12. McIntyre, A. D.: What happened to biological effects monitoring? Mar. Pollut. Bull. 15, 391–392 (1984)Google Scholar
  13. Pearson, T. H.: The effect of industrial effluent from pulp and paper mills on the marine benthic environment. Proc. R. Soc. (Ser. B) 180, 469–485 (1972)Google Scholar
  14. Pearson, T. H.: The benthic ecology of Loch Linnhe and Loch Eil, a sea-loch system on the west coast of Scotland. IV. Changes in the benthic fauna attributable to organic enrichment. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 20, 1–41 (1975)Google Scholar
  15. Pianka, E. R.: On r- and K-selection. Am. Nat. 104, 592–597 (1970)Google Scholar
  16. Raffaelli, D. G. and C. F. Mason: Pollution monitoring with meiofauna, using the ratio of nematodes to copepods. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 12, 158–163 (1981)Google Scholar
  17. Sanders, H. L.: Marine benthic diversity: a comparative study. Am. Nat. 102, 243–282 (1968)Google Scholar
  18. Warwick, R. M., C. L. George and J. R. Davies: Annual macrofauma production in a Venus community. Estuar. cstl mar. Sci. 7, 215–241 (1978)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. M. Warwick
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Marine Environmental ResearchNatural Environment Research CouncilPlymounthEngland

Personalised recommendations