Planta

, Volume 171, Issue 4, pp 466–473 | Cite as

Water stress in Eucalyptus pauciflora: comparison of effects on stomatal conductance with effects on the mesophyll capacity for photosynthesis, and investigation of a possible involvement of photoinhibition

  • Miko U. F. Kirschbaum
Article

Abstract

Seedlings of Eucalyptus pauciflora Sieb. ex Spreng., grown in 4-1 pots, were stressed by withholding water while relationships between net assimilation rate (A) and intercellular partial pressure of CO2 (pi) in selected leaves were obtained repeatedly throughout the stress cycle. Water stress at first caused stomatal closure without any decline in the A(pi) relationship. As stress became more severe, the A(pi) relationship was affected as well. This always affected assimilation rate at both high and low intercellular partial pressures of CO2. It was then tested whether water-stressed leaves were more prone to photoinhibition than unstressed ones. Plants were water-stressed while at the same time subjected to strong photon flux area density (2000 μmol quanta·m-2·s-1). A possible light-induced inhibition was assessed by comparing quantum yields of photosynthesis with light directed onto one or the other surface of the leaf. A decline in quantum yield was observed, and the decline on the previously irradiated side was more pronounced than on the previously shaded side, but the effect was small and disappeared entirely within 1 d of rewatering the plants. It is concluded that photoinhibition can play a role, but not an important one, in the effect of water stress on the A(pi) relationship in leaves of E. pauciflora.

Key words

Eucalyptus Gas exchange Photoinhibition Photosynthesis and water stress Stomatal conductance Water stress 

Abbreviations and symbols

RuBP

ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate

A

net assimilation rate

pi

intercellular partial pressure of CO2

α

quantum yield of photosynthesis (net assimilation or RuBP-regeneration rate)

Δw

difference in water content between air saturated at leaf temperature and the actual vapor content of the air, expressed as mole fraction

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Björkman, O., Powles, S.B. (1984) Inhibition of photosynthetic reactions under water stress: interaction with light level. Planta 161, 490–504Google Scholar
  2. Björkman, O., Powles, S.B., Fork, D.C., Öquist, G. (1981) Interaction between high irradiance and water stress on photosynthetic reactions in Nerium oleander. Carnegie Inst. Washington Yearb. 80, 57–59Google Scholar
  3. Blackman, P.G., Davies, W.J. (1985) Root to shoot communication in maize plants of the effects of soil drying. J. Exp. Bot. 36, 39–48Google Scholar
  4. Boyer, J.S. (1976) Water deficits and photosynthesis. In: Water deficits and plant growth, vol. IV, pp. 153–190, Kozlowski, T.T., ed. Academic Press, New York San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  5. Brooks, A. (1986) Phosphorus nutrition and photosynthesis in spinach leaves: effects on ribulose-1,5-bisphosphatase carboxylase activation, quantum yield and contents of some Calvin-cycle metabolites. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 13, 221–237Google Scholar
  6. Bunce, J.A. (1986) Volume and osmotic potential changes in relation to inhibition of photosynthesis by water stress in intact leaves. Can. J. Bot. 64, 557–560Google Scholar
  7. Collatz, G.J. (1977) Influence of certain environmental factors on photosynthesis and photorespiration in Simmondsia chinensis. Planta 134, 127–132Google Scholar
  8. Collatz, G.J., Ferrar, P.J., Slatyer, R.O. (1976) Effects of water stress and differential hardening treatments on photosynthetic characteristics of a xeromorphic shrub, Eucalyptus socialis F. Muell. Oecologia 23, 95–105Google Scholar
  9. Comstock, J., Ehleringer, J. (1984) Photosynthetic responses to slowly decreasing leaf water potentials in Encelia frutescens. Oecologia 61, 241–248Google Scholar
  10. Ehleringer, J.R., Cook, C.S. (1984) Photosynthesis in Encelia farinosa Gray in response to decreasing leaf water potential. Plant Physiol. 75, 688–693Google Scholar
  11. Farquhar, G.D., Sharkey, T.D. (1982) Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 33, 317–345Google Scholar
  12. Farquhar, G.D., von Caemmerer, S. (1982) Modelling of photosynthetic response to environmental conditions. In: Encyclopedia of plant physiology, N.S., vol. 12B: Physiological plant ecology II: Water relations and carbon assimilation, pp. 549–588, Lange, O.L., Nobel, P.S., Osmond, C.B., Ziegler, H., eds. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  13. Farquhar, G.D., von Caemmerer, S., Berry, J.A. (1980) A biochemical model for photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta 149, 78–90Google Scholar
  14. Gollan, T., Passioura, J.B., Munns, R. (1986) Soil water status effects the stomatal conductance of fully turgid wheat and sunflower leaves. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 13, 459–464Google Scholar
  15. Gollan, T., Turner, N.C., Schulze, E.-D. (1985) The response of stomata and leaf gas exchange to vapour pressure deficits and soil water content. III. In the selerophyllous woody species Nerium oleander. Oecologia 65, 356–362Google Scholar
  16. Jones, H.G. (1973) Moderate-term water stresses and associated changes in some photosynthetic parameters in cotton. New Phytol. 72, 1095–1105Google Scholar
  17. Kaiser, W.M. (1982) Correlation between changes in photosynthetic activity and changes in total protoplast volume in leaf tissue from hygro-, meso- and xerophytes under ostomic stress. Planta 154, 538–545Google Scholar
  18. Kirschbaum, M.U.F. (1987) A model of photosynthesis for isobilateral leaves incorporating biochemical constraints and the light gradient within the leaf. In: Progress in photosynthesis research, vol. IV (5), pp. 261–264, Biggins, J., ed., Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  19. Kirschbaum, M.U.F., Farquhar, G.D. (1984) Temperature dependence of whole-leaf photosynthesis in Eucalyptus pauciflora Sieb. ex Spreng. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 11, 519–538Google Scholar
  20. Kirschbaum, M.U.F., Farquhar, G.D. (1987) Investigation of the CO2 dependence of quantum yield and respiration in Eucalyptus pauciflora. Plant Physiol. 83, 1032–1036Google Scholar
  21. Ludlow, M.M., Björkman, O. (1984) Paraheliotropic leaf movement in Siratro as a protective mechanism against droughtinduced damage to primary photosynthetic reactions: damage by excessive light and heat. Planta 161, 505–518Google Scholar
  22. Mohanty, P., Boyer, J.S. (1976) Chloroplast response to low leaf water potentials. IV. Quantum yield is reduced. Plant Physiol 57, 704–709Google Scholar
  23. Moldau, H. (1973) Effects of various water regimens on stomatal and mesophyll conductances of bean leaves. Photosynthetica 7, 1–7Google Scholar
  24. Mooney, H.A., Björkman, O., Collatz, G.J. (1977) Photosynthetic acclimation to temperature and water stress in the desert shrub Larrea divaricata. Carnegie Jnst. Washington Yearb. 76, 328–335Google Scholar
  25. Ögren, E., Öquist, G. (1985) Effects of drought on photosynthesis, chlorophyll fluorescence and photoinhibition susceptibility in intact willow leaves. Planta 166, 380–388Google Scholar
  26. O'Toole, J.C., Crookston, R.K., Treharne, K.J., Ozbun, J.L. (1976) Mesophyll resistance and carboxylase activity. A comparison under water stress conditions. Plant Physiol. 57, 465–468Google Scholar
  27. Powles, S.B. (1984) Photoinhibition of photosynthesis induced by visible light. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 35, 15–44Google Scholar
  28. Powles, S.B., Björkman, O. (1982) Photoinhibition of photosynthesis: effect on chlorophyll fluorescence at 77 K in intact leaves and in chloroplast membranes of Nerium oleander. Planta 156, 97–107Google Scholar
  29. Radin, J.W., Ackerson, R.C. (1981) Water relations of cotton plants under nitrogen deficiency. III. Stomatal conductance, photosynthesis, and abscisic acid accumulation during drought. Plant Physiol. 67, 115–119Google Scholar
  30. Sharkey, T.D., Badger, M.R. (1982) Effects of water stress on photosynthetic electron transport, photophosphorylation, and metabolite levels of Xanthium strumarium mesophyll cells. Planta 156, 199–206Google Scholar
  31. Sharp, R.E., Boyer, J.S. (1986) Photosynthesis at low water potentials in sunflower: lack of photoinhibitory effects. Plant Physiol. 82, 90–95Google Scholar
  32. Troughton, J.H., Slatyer, R.O. (1969) Plant water status, leaf temperature, and the calculated mesophyll resistance to carbon dioxide of cotton leaves. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 22, 815–827Google Scholar
  33. Turner, N.C., Schulze, E.-D., Gollan, T. (1984) The response of stomata and leaf gas exchange to vapur pressure deficits and soil water content. II. In the mesophytic herbaceous species Helianthus annuus. Oecologia 65, 348–355Google Scholar
  34. von Caemmerer, S., Farquhar, G.D. (1984) Effects of partial defoliation, changes of irradiance during growth, short-term water stress and growth at enhanced p(CO2( on the photosynthetic capacity of leaves of Phaseolus vulgaris L. Planta 160, 320–329Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Miko U. F. Kirschbaum
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Environmental Biology, Research School of Biological SciencesAustralian National UniversityCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations