Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Pre-entrepreneurial income, cash-flow growth and survival of startup businesses: Model and tests on U.K. data

  • 681 Accesses

  • 22 Citations

Abstract

A target income/human capital model of startup survival and growth is derived and tested. The objective of the entrepreneur is to produce an independent source of income for him/herself to replace income from previous employment. Target income is a function of pre-entrepreneurial income and human capital represented by age. The model predicts that higher pre-income entrepreneurs and more mature individuals will grow faster to achieve these targets and that growth is an ambiguous function of size. It also predicts that these same individuals, and businesses that start larger, will be more likely to survive. The key results of the empirical analysis are that (a) businesses run by proprietors with higher pre-entrepreneurial incomes do indeed grow faster than other startups but have no greater survival prospects, and (b) businesses run by mature proprietors possess greater longevity. We conclude that business income targets in practice constitute a significant motivation for startup growth, and that the human capital represented by age plays no additional role. However, proprietor age rather than pre-income determines survival, despite the fact that pre-income and age are positively correlated both with each other and with growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. AudretschDavid B., 1991, ‘New Firm Survival and the Technological Regime’, Review of Economics and Statistics 60(3), 441–450.

  2. Audretsch, David B. and Talat Mahmood, 1995, ‘New Firm Survival: New Results Using a Hazard Function’, Review of Economics and Statistics (forthcoming).

  3. BatesTimothy, 1990, ‘Entrepreneur Human Capital Inputs and Small Business Longevity’, Review of Economics and Statistics LXXII(4), 551–559.

  4. BaumolWilliam J., 1962, ‘On the Theory of Expansion of the Firm’, American Economic Review 52, 1078–1087

  5. Brock, W. A. and David S. Evans, 1986 The Economics of Small Businesses, Holmes and Meier.

  6. Cressy, Robert C., 1993, The Startup Tracking Exercise: Third Year Report, prepared for National Westminster Bank of Great Britain, November.

  7. Cressy, Robert C., 1995, ‘Loan Commitments and Business Starts: An Empirical Investigation on U.K. Data’, Small Business Economics (forthcoming).

  8. Dunne, P. and Alan Hughes, 1990, ‘Small Firms: Age, Growth and Survival in the 1990s’, Paper presented at the 17th EARIE conference, Lisbon, Portugal.

  9. DunneT., M. J.Roberts and L.Samuelson, 1989, ‘The Growth and Failure of U.S. Manufacturing Plants’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 104, 671–698.

  10. European Network for SME Research (ENSR), 1993, The European Observatory for SMEs, Annual Report to the European Commission, EIM, Holland.

  11. EvansDavid S, 1987a, ‘Tests of Alternative Theories of Firm Growth’, Journal of Political Economy 95(4), 657–674.

  12. EvansDavid S., 1987b, ‘The Relationship between Firm Growth, Size and Age: Estimates for 100 Manufacturing Industries’, Journal of Industrial Economics 35, 567–581.

  13. EvansDavid and BoyanJovanovic, 1989, ‘An Estimated Model of Entrepreneurial Choice Under Liquidity Constraints’, Journal of Political Economy 97(4), 808–827.

  14. Frank, Murray Z, ‘An Intertemporal Model of Industrial Exit’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 103 (May), 333–344.

  15. GangulyP., 1985, U.K. Small Business Statistics and International Comparisons, Small Business Research Trust, London: Harper Row.

  16. HallB., 1987, ‘The Relationship between Firm Size and Firm Growth in the United States Manufacturing Sector’, Journal of Industrial Economics 35(4), 583–606.

  17. HeckmanJames R., 1979, ‘Sample Selection as Specification Bias’, Econometrica 47 (January), 153–161.

  18. HudsonJohn, 1990, ‘An Information Based Model of Industrial Exit’, Economics Letters 33, 175–178.

  19. JovanovicBoyan, 1982, ‘Selection and the Evolution of Industry’, Econometrica 50(3), (May), 649–670.

  20. Maddala, G. S, 1983, Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics, Cambridge.

  21. Market Research Enterprises, 1991, Life Cycle II: Young Businesses, April Report, London, April.

  22. MataJose, 1994, ‘Firm growth during Infancy’, Small Business Economics 6, 27–39.

  23. ReidGavin C, 1991, ‘Staying in Business’, International Journal of Industrial Organisation 9, 545–556.

  24. ReidGavin C., 1993, Small Business Enterprise: An Economic Analysis, London: Routledge.

  25. ReynoldsP. and BrendaMiller, 1987, ‘1987 Minnesota New Firms Study: An Exploration of New Firms and their Economic Contributions’, Centre for the Study of Entrepreneurship, Marquette University, U.S.A.

  26. SimonH. A., 1979, ‘Rational Decision-taking in Business Organization’, American Economic Review 69, 493–513.

  27. StanworthJohn and ColinGray (eds.), 1991, Bolton 20 Years On, London: Paul Chapman.

  28. Variyam and Kraybill, 1992, ‘Empirical Evidence on Determinants of Firm Growth’, Economics Letters 38, 31–36.

  29. WatsonRobert, 1990, ‘Employment Change, Profits and Directors Renumeration in Small and Closely-held U.K. Companies’, Scottish Journal of Political Economy 37(3) (August), 259–274.

Download references

Author information

Additional information

National Westminster Bank Principal Research Fellow and Assistant Director (Research) of Warwick University SME Centre. This research is part of a wider study financed by the National Westminster Bank of Great Britain. I am indebted to the Bank for the provision of the raw data. Needless to say the views expressed here are those of the author and not necessarily those of NatWest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cressy, R. Pre-entrepreneurial income, cash-flow growth and survival of startup businesses: Model and tests on U.K. data. Small Bus Econ 8, 49–58 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00391975

Download citation

Keywords

  • Income
  • Human Capital
  • Significant Motivation
  • Additional Role
  • Mature Individual