Marine Biology

, Volume 24, Issue 3, pp 189–201 | Cite as

The sulfur cycle of a marine sediment model system

  • B. B. Jørgensen
  • T. Fenchel
Article

Abstract

In a laboratory sediment model consisting of sand and chopped Zostera marina leaves, the sulfur cycle and the succession and zonation patterns of sulfur bacteria were studied for a period of 7 months. The pool size of different forms of sulfur was quantified, and the rate of sulfate reduction was measured with an in situ radio-tracer technique at regular intervals. From these data, transfer rates of the sulfur cycle in the system could be calculated for different periods. The rate of sulfate reduction was initially 80 nMS·cm3·day-1; this decreased to 25 nMS·cm3·day-1 towards the end of the experiment as the system started to become oxidized. There was a transient accumulation of elemental sulfur in the bacterial plate at the sediment surface. More than 50% of the total mineralization of the organic material was due to sulfate reduction. Comparison with the net oxygen uptake showed that, during the first 2 to 3 months (when the sediment closely resembled a natural, reduced shallow water sediment), SO4- was equally as important as O2 for transporting oxidacion equivalents from the water to the sediment.

Keywords

Shallow Water Transfer Rate Sediment Surface Oxygen Uptake Marine Sediment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Baas Becking, L. G. M. and E. J. F. Wood: Biological processes in the estuarine environment. I+II Ecology of the sulphur cycle. Proc. K. ned. Akad. Wet. (Sect. B) 58, 160–181 (1955).Google Scholar
  2. Berner, R. A.: An idealized model of dissolved sulfate distribution in recent sediments. Geochim. cosmochim. Acta 28, 1497–1503 (1964).Google Scholar
  3. Butlin, K. R.: The bacterial sulphur cycle. Research, Lond. 6, 184–191 (1953).Google Scholar
  4. Fenchel, T.: The ecology of marine microbenthos. IV. Structure and function of the benthic ecosystem, its chemical and physical factors and the microfauna communities, with special reference to the ciliated protozoa. Ophelia 6, 1–182 (1969).Google Scholar
  5. — and R. J. Riedl: The sulfide system: a new biotic community underneath the oxidized layer of marine sand bottoms. Mar. Biol. 7, 255–268 (1970).Google Scholar
  6. Gemerden, H. van: On the bacterial sulphur cycle of inland waters, 110 pp. Thesis, Leiden 1967.Google Scholar
  7. Golterman, H. L. (Ed.): Methods for chemical analysis of fresh waters, 188 pp. IBP Handbook No. 8. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications 1971.Google Scholar
  8. Hallberg, R. O.: Some factors of significance in the formation of sedimentary metal sulphides. Stockh. Contr. Geol. 15, 39–66 (1968).Google Scholar
  9. Hartmann, M. und H. Nielsen: δS-Werte in rezenten Meeressedimenten und ihre Deutung am Beispiel einiger Sedimentprofile aus der westlichen Ostsee. Geol. Rdsch. 58, 621–655 (1969).Google Scholar
  10. Ivanov, M. V.: Microbiological processes in the formation of sulfur deposits, 298 pp. Jerusalem: Israel Program for Scientific Translations 1968.Google Scholar
  11. Kaplan, I. R., K. O. Emery and S. C. Rittenberg: The distribution and isotopic abundance of sulfur in recent marine sediments of southern California. Geochim. cosmochim. Acta 27, 297–331 (1963).Google Scholar
  12. Nedwell, D. B. and G. D. Floodgate: Temperature-induced changes in the formation of sulphide in a marine sediment. Mar. Biol. 14, 18–24 (1972).Google Scholar
  13. Pamatmat, M. M.: Ecology and metabolism of a benthic community on an intertidal sandflat. Int. Rev. ges. Hydrobiol. 53, 211–298 (1968).Google Scholar
  14. Postgate, J.: Sulphate reduction by bacteria. A. Rev. Microbiol. 13, 505–520 (1959).Google Scholar
  15. Sorokin, Yu. I.: Experimental investigation of bacterial sulfate reduction in the Black Sea using 35S. Mikrobioloigya 31, 402–410 (1962). [Transl. Microbiology 31, 329–335 (1962)].Google Scholar
  16. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 13th ed. 874 pp. Washington: American Public Health Association 1971.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. B. Jørgensen
    • 1
  • T. Fenchel
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory B, Ecology, Zoological InstituteUniversity of AarhusAarhus CDenmark

Personalised recommendations