Advertisement

Marine Biology

, Volume 29, Issue 3, pp 211–234 | Cite as

Ecology of Conus on eastern Indian Ocean fringing reefs: Diversity of species and resource utilization

  • A. J. Kohn
  • J. W. Nybakken
Article

Abstract

The most diverse assemblages of the genus Conus known occur on fringing coral reefs in Thailand and Indonesia. As many as 27 congeneric species of these gastropods inhabit a single reef; in all, we examined 1,350 individuals of 48 species. Several attributes of the populations we observed conform to expectations of a model of ecological characteristics of bench and reef Conus proposed by Kohn (1971a). Number of species (S) averaged 15, and species diversity (H″) averaged 2.3 in the most heterogeneous habitat type — topographically complex, subtidal reef platforms (Type III habitat). Both species richness and evenness of distribution of individuals among species contribute strongly to H″. Fewer congeners and greater numerical dominance by single species characterize more homogeneous habitats. On subtidal reef platforms with large areas of sand substrate and less coral limestone (Type I–III habitat), mean values were S=10, and H″=1.6. In the one intensively studied, truncated reef-limestone platform (Type II–III intermediate habitat), S=13 and H″=1.4. Summed population density of all Conus species in Type III and I–III habitats is similar (0.02 to 0.05 individuals /m2) and comparable to estimates from similar habitats elsewhere in the Indo-West Pacific region. Mean density (0.7/m2) and other population attributes in Type II–III habitat more closely resemble those of Type II than Type III habitats in general. We combined analysis of species diversity and other attributes of assemblages in habitats of different environmental complexity with analysis of microhabitat and food-resource utilization, in order to demonstrate the extent to which specialization on different resources occurs in assemblages differing in diversity and habitat type. In the habitats studied, co-occurring species of Conus specialized to a greater extent on different prey species than on different microhabitat patches, but degree of microhabitat specialization was greater than in similarly complex habitats with assemblages of lower diversity elsewhere in the Indo-West Pacific region. While most Conus species preyed primarily on a different species or higher taxon of polychaetes, diets are not more specialized or dissimilar than in similar habitats elsewhere. Degree of specialization on different prey is not correlated with Conus species diversity in the different types of habitats studied. The data lead to the conclusion that differential predation is as important — and differential microhabitat utilization is more important — in permitting coexistence of potentially competing congeners, compared with conditions in habitats of comparable heterogeneity that support fewer congeners farther from the center of the Indo-West Pacific region. Pairwise comparisons of congeners indicate that many species pairs have low or no overlap in both microhabitat and food utilization. Members of species pairs with high overlap in microhabitat utilization typically eat different prey organisms, and those with similar diets typically occupy different habitats or microhabitats. This applies to molluscivorous as well as vermivorous species. Information on the diets of 11 species is reported here for the first time. Of 48 Indo-West Pacific Conus species whose food is now known, 35 prey on polychaetes, 2 on enteropneusts, 6 on gastropods, and 5 on fishes. Vermivorous Conus prey on relatively few of the polychaete species present in the environments. Species eaten represent only 12% of a total estimated polychaete population density of 27,000 individuals /m2. Certain very abundant polychaetes may be protected from predation by Conus by their small size, others by their long tubes. Two new aspects of size-selective predation by Conus are reported: (1) Although comparisons of predation rate with prey standing-crop suggest that food is plentiful, selective predation on the largest prey individuals present suggests that only small proportions of prey-species populations may have large enough body size to repay foraging effort by the Conus present; (2) composition of the diet changes qualitatively with increase in body size in several vermivorous Conus species; shifting by larger individuals to larger prey species could be documented in C. ebraeus.

Keywords

Coral Reef Polychaete Conus Species Large Prey Eastern Indian Ocean 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Cernohorsky, W.O.: The Condiae of Fiji. Veliger 7, 61–94 (1964)Google Scholar
  2. Cloud, P.E., Jr.: Geology of Saipan, Mariana Islands, Part 4. Submarine topography and shoalwater ecology. Prof. Pap. U.S. geol. Surv. 280-K, 361–445 (1959)Google Scholar
  3. Day, J.H.: A monograph on the Polychaeta of Southern Africa, 2 vol., 878 pp. London: British Museum (Natural History) 1967Google Scholar
  4. Ekman, S.: Zoogeography of the sea, 417 pp. London: Sidgwick & Jackson 1953Google Scholar
  5. Horn, H.S.: Measurement of “overlap” in comparative ecological studies. Am. Nat. 100, 419–424 (1966)Google Scholar
  6. Kohn, A.J.: The ecology of Conus in Hawaii. Ecol. Monogr. 29, 47–90 (1959)Google Scholar
  7. — Environmental complexity and species diversity in the gastropod genus Conus on Indo-West Pacific reef platforms. Am. Nat. 101, 251–259 (1967)Google Scholar
  8. — Microhabitats, abundance and food of Conus on atoll reefs in the Maldive and Chagos Islands. Ecology 49, 1046–1062 (1968)Google Scholar
  9. — Diversity, utilization of resources, and adaptive radiation in shallow-water marine invertebrates of tropical oceanic islands. Limnol. Oceanogr. 16, 332–348 (1971a)Google Scholar
  10. —: Inshore marine habitats of some continental islands in the eastern Indian Ocean. Atoll Res. Bull. 140, 1–29 (1971b)Google Scholar
  11. — and M.C. Lloyd: Polychaetes of truncated reef limestone substrates on eastern Indian Ocean coral reefs: diversity, abundance, and taxonomy. Int. Revue ges. Hydrobiol. 58, 369–400 (1973)Google Scholar
  12. — and G.H. Orians: Ecological data in the classification of closely related species. Syst. Zool. 11, 119–127 (1962)Google Scholar
  13. — and V. Waters: Escape responses of three herbivorous gastropods to the predatory gastropod Conus textile. Anim. Behav. 14, 340–345 (1966)Google Scholar
  14. Levins, R.: Evolution in changing environments, 120 pp. Princeton: Princeton University Press 1968Google Scholar
  15. Lloyd, M. and R.J. Ghelardi: A table for calculating the “equitability” component of species diversity. J. Anim. Ecol. 33, 217–225 (1964)Google Scholar
  16. Loya, Y.: Community structure and species diversity of hermatypic corals at Eilat, Red Sea. Mar. Biol. 13, 100–123 (1972)Google Scholar
  17. Marsh, H.: Observations on the food and feeding of some vermivorous Conus on the Great Barrier Reef. Veliger 14, 45–53 (1971)Google Scholar
  18. Nybakken, J.W.: Correlation of radula tooth structure and food habits of three vermivorous species of Conus. Veliger 12, 316–318 (1970)Google Scholar
  19. Oostingh, C.H.: Conidae from North East Sumatra. Miscnea zool. sumatr. 28, 1–5 (1928)Google Scholar
  20. —: Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Molluskenfauna von Süd-Sumatra. Arch. Molluskenk. 63, 166–255 (1931)Google Scholar
  21. Pielou, E.C.: The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections. J. theor. Biol. 13, 131–144 (1966)Google Scholar
  22. Porter, J.W.: Patterns of species diversity in Caribbean reef corals. Ecology 53, 745–748 (1972)Google Scholar
  23. Sheldon, A.J.: Equitability indices: dependence on the species count. Ecology 50, 466–467 (1969)Google Scholar
  24. Siegel, S.: Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences, 312 pp. New York: McGraw-Hill 1956Google Scholar
  25. Suvatti, C.: Molluscs of Siam. In: Fauna of Thailand, pp 82–85. Bangkok: Bureau of Fisheries 1950Google Scholar
  26. Taylor, J.D.: Coral reef and associated invertebrate communities (mainly molluscan) around Mahe, Seychelles. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. (Ser. B.) 254, 129–206 (1968)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. J. Kohn
    • 1
  • J. W. Nybakken
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations