Marine Biology

, Volume 97, Issue 1, pp 67–77

Omnivorous feeding behavior of the Antarctic krill Euphausia superba

  • H. J. Price
  • K. R. Boyd
  • C. M. Boyd


Feeding experiments were conducted at Palmer Station from December 1985 to February 1986 to examine the potential role of copepod prey as an alternative food source for Euphausia superba. Copepod concentration, copepod size, phytoplankton concentration, the duration of krill starvation and the volume of experimental vessels were altered to determine effects on ingestion and clearance rates. Krill allowed to feed on phytoplankton and copepods in 50-litre tubs showed greatly increased feeding rates relative to animals feeding in the much smaller volumes of water traditionally used for krill-feeding studies. Clearance rates on copepods remained constant over the range of concentrations offered, but clearance rates on phytoplankton increased linearly with phytoplankton concentration. Feeding rates increased when larger copepods were offered and when krill were starved for two weeks prior to experiments. Clearance rates of krill feeding on copepods were higher than, but not correlated with, their clearance rates on phytoplankton in the same vessel. E. superba may have a distinct mechanism for capturing copepods, perhaps through mechanoreception. Although our observed clearance rate of 1055 ml krill-1 h-1 indicates that krill can feed very efficiently on copepod prey, such feeding would meet less than 10% of their minimum metabolic requirements at the “typical” copepod concentrations reported for Antarctic waters. However, substantial energy could be gained if krill fed on the patches of high copepod concentrations occasionally reported during the austral summer, or if krill and copepods were concentrated beneath the sea ice during the winter or spring months. Our results, indicating efficient feeding on zooplankton and higher clearance rates on phytoplankton than previously believed, represent a step towards balancing the energy budget of E. superba in Antarctic waters.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. Adams, J. A. and J. H. Steele: Shipboard experiments on the feeding of Calanus finmarchicus (Gunnerus). In: Some contemporary studies in marine science, pp 19–35. Ed. by H. Barnes London: Allen and Unwin Ltd. 1966Google Scholar
  2. Ainley, D. G., W. R. Fraser, C. W. Sullivan, J. J. Torres, T. L. Hopkins and W. O. Smith: Antarctic mesopelagic micronekton: evidence from seabirds that pack ice affects community structure. Science, Wash. D.C. 232, 847–850 (1986)Google Scholar
  3. Antezana, T., K. Ray and C. Melo: Trophic behavior of Euphausia superba Dana in laboratory conditions. Polar Biol. 1, 77–82 (1982)Google Scholar
  4. Berkes, F.: Some aspects of feeding mechanisms of euphausiid crustaceans. Crustaceana 29, 266–270 (1975)Google Scholar
  5. Boyd, C. M.: Selection of particle sizes by filter-feeding organisms: a plea for reason. Limnol. Oceanogr. 21, 175–180 (1976)Google Scholar
  6. Boyd, C. M., M. Heyraud and C. N. Boyd: Feeding of the Antarctic krill, Euphausia superba. J. Crust. Biol. 4 (Spec. No. 1), 123–141 (1984)Google Scholar
  7. Clarke, A.: The biochemical composition of krill, Euphausia superba Dana, from South Georgia. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 43, 221–236 (1980)Google Scholar
  8. Clarke, A. and D. J. Morris: Towards an energy budget for krill: the physiology and biochemistry of Euphausia superba Dana. Polar Biol. 2, 69–86 (1983)Google Scholar
  9. Conover, R. J., A. W. Herman, S. J. Prinsenberg and L. R. Harris: Distribution and feeding by the copepod Pseudocalanus minutus under fast ice during the Arctic spring. Science Wash. D.C. 232, 1245–1247 (1986)Google Scholar
  10. El-Sayed, S. Z. and E. F. Mandelli: Primary production and standing crop of phytoplankton in the Weddell Sea and Drake Passage. In: Biology of the Antarctic Seas II. Ed. by W. L. Schmitt and G. A. Llano. Antarct. Res. Ser. 5 87–106 (1965)Google Scholar
  11. El-Sayed, S. Z. and M. A. McWinnie: Antarctic krill: protein of the last frontier. Oceanus 22, 13–20 (1979)Google Scholar
  12. El-Sayed, S. Z. and L. H. Weber: Spatial and temporal variations in phytoplankton biomass and primary productivity in the Southwest Atlantic and the Scotia Sea. Polar Biol. 1, 83–90 (1982)Google Scholar
  13. Foxton, P.: The distribution of the standing crop of zooplankton in the Southern Ocean. Discovery Rep. 28, 191–236 (1956)Google Scholar
  14. Frost, B. W.: Effects of size and concentration of food particles on the feeding behavior of the marine planktonic copepod Calanus pacificus. Limnol. Oceanogr. 17, 805–815 (1972)Google Scholar
  15. Frost, B. W.: A threshold feeding behavior in Calanus pacificus. Limnol. Oceanogr. 20, 263–266 (1975)Google Scholar
  16. Fukuchi, M., A. Tanimura and H. Ohtsuka: Zooplankton community conditions under sea ice near Syowa Station, Antarctica. Bull. mar. Sci. 37, 518–528 (1985)Google Scholar
  17. Guillard, R. R. and J. Ryther: Studies of marine planktonic diatoms. 1. Cyclotella nana (Hustedt) and Detonula confervacea (Cleve). Can. J. Microbiol. 8, 229–239 (1962)Google Scholar
  18. Hamner, W. M., P. P. Hamner, S. W. Strand and R. Gilmer: Behavior of Antarctic krill, Euphausia superba: Chemoreception, feeding, schooling and molting. Science Wash. D.C. 220, 433–435 (1983)Google Scholar
  19. Hempel, I.: Vertical distribution of larvae of Antarctic krill, Euphausia superba. In: Antarctic nutrients and food webs, pp 308–310. Ed. by W. R. Siegfied, P. R. Condry and R. M. Laws. Berlin: Springer-Verlag 1985Google Scholar
  20. Holm-Hansen, O. and M. Huntley: Feeding requirements of krill in relation to food sources. J. Crust. Biol. 4 (Spec. No. 1), 156–173 (1984)Google Scholar
  21. Hopkins, T. L.: Zooplankton standing crop in the Pacific sector of the Antarctic. Antarct. Res. Ser. 17, 347–362 (1970)Google Scholar
  22. Hopkins, T. L.: The zooplankton community of Croker Passage, Antarctic Peninsula. Polar Biol. 4, 161–170 (1985a)Google Scholar
  23. Hopkins, T. L.: Food web of an Antarctic midwater ecosystem Mar. Biol. 89, 197–212 (1985b)Google Scholar
  24. Horner, R. A. (Ed.): Sea ice biota, 215 pp. Boca Raton: CRC Press 1985Google Scholar
  25. Ikeda, T.: Development of the Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba Dana) observed in the laboratory. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 75, 107–117 (1984)Google Scholar
  26. Ikeda, T. and P. Dixon: Body shrinkage as a possible overwintering mechanism of the Antarctic krill, Euphausia superba Dana. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 62, 143–151 (1982)Google Scholar
  27. Kato, M., S. Segawa and E. Tanoue: Filtering and ingestion rates of the Antarctic krill, Euphausia superba, Dana. Trans. Tokyo Univ. Fish. 5, 167–175 (1982)Google Scholar
  28. Kleinbaum, D. G. and L. L. Kupper: Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods, 556 pp. North Scituate: Duxbury Press 1978Google Scholar
  29. Landry, M. R.: Switching between herbivory and carnivory by the planktonic marine copepod Calanus pacificus. Mar. Biol. 65, 77–82 (1981)Google Scholar
  30. Lasker, R.: Feeding, growth, respiration and carbon utilization of a euphausiid crustacean. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 23, 1291–1317 (1966)Google Scholar
  31. Marin, V., M. Huntley and B. Frost: Measuring feeding rates of pelagic herbivores: analysis of experimental design and methods. Mar. Biol. 93, 49–58 (1986)Google Scholar
  32. Marr, J. W. S.: The natural history and geography of the Antarctic krill Euphausia superba Dana. Discovery Rep. 32, 33–464 (1962)Google Scholar
  33. Mauchline, J.: The biology of mysids and euphausiids. Adv. mar. Biol. 18, 1–681 (1980)Google Scholar
  34. Mauchline, J. and L. R. Fisher: The biology of euphausiids. Adv. mar. Biol. 7, 1–454 (1969)Google Scholar
  35. Mayzaud, P., J. Farber-Lorda and M. C. Corre: Aspects of the nutritional metabolism of two Antarctic euphausiids: Euphausia superba and Thysanoessa macrura. In: Antarctic nutrient cycles and food webs, pp 330–338. Ed. by W. R. Siegfried, P. R. Condy and R. M. Laws. Berlin: Springer-Verlag 1985Google Scholar
  36. McClatchie, S. and C. M. Boyd: Morphological study of sieve efficiencies and mandibular surfaces in the Antarctic krill, Euphausia superba. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 40, 955–967 (1983)Google Scholar
  37. McClatchie, S. and M. R. Lewis: Limitations of grazing rate equations: the case for time series measurements. Mar. Biol. 92, 135–140 (1986)Google Scholar
  38. Morris, D. J.: Filtration rates of Euphausia superba Dana: under or overestimates? J. Crust. Biol. 4 (Spec. No. 1), 185–197 (1984)Google Scholar
  39. Morris, D. J., P., Ward and A. Clarke: Some aspects of feeding in the Antarctic krill, Euphausia superba. Polar Biol. 2, 21–26 (1983)Google Scholar
  40. Murano, M., S. Segawa and M. Kato: Growth, moult and filtering rate of krill in laboratory conditions. Abstracts of BIOMASS Meeting. Tokyo: National Institute of Polar Research 1982Google Scholar
  41. Nemoto, T.: Feeding patterns of euphausiids and differentiations in their body characters. Info. Bull. Planktol. Japan. Commen. Iss., 157–174 (1967)Google Scholar
  42. Ohman, M. D.: Omnivory by Euphausia pacifica: the role of copepod prey. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 19, 125–131 (1984)Google Scholar
  43. Parsons, T. R., Y. Maita and C. M. Lalli: A manual of chemical and biological methods for seawater analysis, 173 pp. New York: Pergamon Press 1984Google Scholar
  44. Pavlov, V. Y.: On the qualitative composition of the food of Euphausia superba Dana. Fish. Res. Bd Can. Transl. Ser. No. 2953, 1–19 (1974)Google Scholar
  45. Pelymsky, A. G. and Ye, G. Arashkevich: Quantitative characteristics of the feeding of euphausiids in the tropical part of the Pacific Ocean. Oceanol. 20, 199–203 (1980)Google Scholar
  46. Ponomareva, L. A.: Euphausiids of the Sea of Japan feeding on copepods. Dokl. Akad. nauk. S.S.S.R. 98, 153–154 (1954)Google Scholar
  47. Price, H. J. and G. A. Paffenhöfer: Effects of concentration on the feeding of a marine copepod in algal monocultures and mixtures. J. Plankt. Res. 8, 119–128 (1985)Google Scholar
  48. Quetin, L. B. and R. M. Ross: Feeding by Antarctic krill, Euphausia superba: does size matter? In: Antarctic nutrient cycles and food webs, pp 372–377 Ed. by W. R. Siegfried, P. R. Condy and R. M. Laws. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, (1985)Google Scholar
  49. Ross, R. M.: Energetics of Euphausia pacifica I. Effects of body carbon and nitrogen and temperature on measured and predicted production. Mar. Biol. 68, 1–13 (1982)Google Scholar
  50. Runge, J. A.: Effects of hunger and season on feeding behavior of Calanus pacificus. Limnol. Oceanogr. 25, 134–145 (1980)Google Scholar
  51. Sameoto, D. D.: Relationships between stomach contents and vertical migration in Meganyctiphanes norvegica, Thysanoessa raschii and T. inermis (Crustaceana, Euphausiacea). J. Plankt. Res. 2, 129–143 (1980)Google Scholar
  52. Schnack, S. B.: Feeding of two Antarctic copepod species (Calanus propinquus and Metridia gerlachei) on a mixture of centric diatoms. Polar Biol. 2, 63–68 (1983)Google Scholar
  53. Schnack, S. B., V. Smetacek, B. v. Bodungen and P. Stegmann: Utilization of phytoplankton by copepods in Antarctic waters during spring. In: Marine biology of polar regions and effects of stress on marine organisms, pp 65–81. Ed. by J. S. Gray and M. E. Christiansen, Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons Ltd 1985Google Scholar
  54. Shulenberger, E., J. H. Wormuth and V. J. Loeb: A large swarm of Euphausia superba: overview of patch structure and composition. J. Crust. Biol. 4 (Spec. No. 1), 75–95 (1984)Google Scholar
  55. Sokal, R. R. and F. J. Rohlf: Biometry, 776 pp. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Company 1969Google Scholar
  56. Vladimirskaya, Ye. V.: Distribution of zooplankton in the vicinity of South Georgia Island in the summer of 1975. Oceanologia 18, 340–342 (1978)Google Scholar
  57. Voronina, N. M.: Seasonal cycles of some Antarctic copepod species. In: Antarctic ecology, Vol. 1. pp 162–172. Ed. by M. W. Holdgate, New York: Academic Press 1970Google Scholar
  58. Voronina, N. M.: Vertical structure of a pelagic community in the Antarctic. Oceanologia 12, 415–420 (1972)Google Scholar
  59. Yen, J.: Effects of prey concentration, prey size, predator life stage, predator starvation and season on predation rates of the carnivorous copepod Euchaeta elongata. Mar. Biol. 75, 69–77 (1983)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. J. Price
    • 1
  • K. R. Boyd
    • 1
  • C. M. Boyd
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of OceanographyDalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada

Personalised recommendations