Advertisement

Planta

, Volume 81, Issue 3, pp 287–302 | Cite as

Action spectra for photogrowth and phototropism in protonemata of the moss Physcomitrium turbinatum

  • Bernard J. Nebel
Article

Summary

Protonemata of Physcomitrium were grown in a sucrose-mineral nutrient, liquid medium. Even in this medium containing organic nutrient, the growth rate of lateral branch, chloronemal filaments showed a light dependence which was linear with log intensity. Intensities necessary to give a constant growth rate (45 μ/1.75 hrs.) were determined at selected wavelengths. The resulting action spectrum paralleled the in-vivo absorption spectrum of a single filament in the red region, showing a major peak at 680 nm. Growth rate and absorption approached zero in the far-red (730 nm). However, significant growth activity occurred at 365–400 nm where absorption was low, and negligible growth was found at 440–500 nm where absorption was high.

The action spectrum for the positive, directional photo-orientation of growth was determined by the null-point method in which the effectiveness of each selected wavelength was compared to a 665-nm standard in simultaneous, bilateral irradiation. In contrast to growth, the major peak of phototropic activity was found at 730 nm with significant activity extending to 800 nm. A minor peak was at 680 nm. There was some activity in near ultraviolet but not at longer blue wavelengths.

It is concluded that the blue-absorbing system responsible for phototropism in virtually all other groups of plants is inactive or absent in Physcomitrium. Instead growth and orientation seem to be dependent upon an interaction between the photosynthetic and phytochrome systems. Further, the data suggest that the physiological activity of phytochrome in photo-orientation of growth does not derive from a certain amount of Pfr or Pfr/Pr ratio but rather it derives from the simultaneous excitation and consequent cycling of Pr and Pfr.

Keywords

Major Peak Action Spectrum Organic Nutrient Lateral Branch Minor Peak 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arnon, D. I.: The chloroplast as a functional unit in photosynthesis. Handbuch der Pflanzenphysiologie (W. Ruhland, ed.), vol. V, p. 773–829. Berlin-Göttingen-Heidelberg: Springer 1960.Google Scholar
  2. — H. Y. Tsujimoto, and B. D. McSwain: Ferredoxin and photosynthetic phosphorylation. Nature (Lond.) 214, 562–566 (1967).Google Scholar
  3. Bopp, M.: Morphogenese der Laubmoose. Biol. Revs. 36, 237–280 (1961).Google Scholar
  4. Briggs W. R. and D. C. Fork: Studies on phytochrome transformation in vitro. Carnegie Inst. Yearbook No. 64, p. 406–412 (1965).Google Scholar
  5. Delbrück, M., and W. Shropshire: Action and transmission spectra of Phycomyces. Plant Physiol. 35, 194–204 (1960).Google Scholar
  6. Etzold, H.: Der Polarotropismus und Phototropismus der Chloronemen von Dryopteris filix-mas (L.) Schott. Planta (Berl.) 64, 254–280 (1965).Google Scholar
  7. Freeland, R. O.: Plastid pigments of gametophytes and sporophytes of Musci. Plant Physiol. 32, 64–66 (1957).Google Scholar
  8. Hartmann, K. M.: A general hypothesis to interpret “high energy phenomena” of photomorphogenesis on the basis of phytochrome. Photochem. Photobiol. 5, 349–366 (1966).Google Scholar
  9. Hartmann, K. M.: Photoreceptor problems in photomorphogenic responses under high-energy-conditions (UV-blue-far-red). In: Photochemistry and photobiology in plant physiology, Europ. Photobiol. Symp., Abstr. p. 29–32. Hvar, Yugoslavia (1967).Google Scholar
  10. Hendricks, S. B., and H. A. Borthwick: Photocontrol of plant development by the simultaneous excitation of two interconvertible pigments. II. Theory and control of anthocyanin synthesis. Bot. Gaz. 120, 187–193 (1959).Google Scholar
  11. Hillman, W. S.: The physiology of phytochrome. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 18, 301–324 (1967).Google Scholar
  12. Jaffe, L., and H. Etzold: Tropic responses of Funaria spores to red light. Biophys. J. 5, 715–742 (1965).Google Scholar
  13. Jahn, H.: Die Wirkung von Blaulicht und Kinetin auf die Protonemaentwicklung und Knospenbildung von Funaria hygrometrica Sibth. Flora (Jena) 155, 10–29 (1964).Google Scholar
  14. Kofler, L.: Contribution a l'étude biologique des mousses cultivées in vitro; Germination des spores, croissance et développement du protonéma chez Funaria hygrometrica. Rev. bryol. lichénol. 28, 1–202 (1959).Google Scholar
  15. Lane, H. C., H. M. Cathey, and L. T. Evans: The dependence of flowering in several long-day plants on the spectral composition of light extending the photoperiod. Amer. J. Bot. 52, 1006–1014 (1965).Google Scholar
  16. Linschitz, H., V. Kasche, W. Butler, and W. H. Siegelman: The kinetics of phytochrome conversion. J. Biol. Chem. 241, 3395–3403 (1966).Google Scholar
  17. Miller, J. H., and P. M. Miller: Action spectra for light-induced elongation in fern protonemata. Physiol. Plantarum (Cph.) 20, 128–138 (1967).Google Scholar
  18. Mitra, G. C., A. Allsopp, and P. F. Wareing: The effects of light of various qualities on the development of the protonema and bud formation in Pohlia nutans (Hedw.) Lindb. Phytomorphology 9, 47–55 (1959).Google Scholar
  19. Mohr, H.: Die Abhängigkeit des Protonemawachstums und der Protonemapolarität bei Farnen von Licht. Planta (berl.) 47, 127–158 (1956).Google Scholar
  20. Nebel, B. J., and A. W. Naylor: Initiation and development of shoot-buds from protonemata in the moss Physcomitrium turbinatum. Amer. J. Bot. 55, 33–37 (1968).Google Scholar
  21. Page, R. M., and G. M. Curry: Studies on phototropism of young sporangiophores of Pilobolus kleinii. Photochem. Photobiol. 5, 31–40 (1966).Google Scholar
  22. Pratt, L. H., and W. R. Briggs: Photochemical and nonphotochemical reactions of phytochrome in vivo. Plant Physiol. 41, 467–474 (1966).Google Scholar
  23. Pringsheim, E., u. O. Pringsheim: Physiologische Studien an Moosen. III. Die Züchtung von Laubmoosprotonemen im Dunkeln. Jb. wiss. Bot. 82, 311–332 (1935).Google Scholar
  24. Shropshire, W.: The lens effect and phototropism of Phycomyces. J. Gen. Physiol. 45, 949–958 (1962).Google Scholar
  25. Siegelman, H. W., and W. L. Butler: Properties of phytochrome. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 16, 383–392 (1965).Google Scholar
  26. Taylor, A. O., and B. A. Bonner: Isolation of phytochrome from the alga Mesotaenium and liverwort Sphaerocarpus. Plant Physiol. 42, 762–766 (1967).Google Scholar
  27. Valanne, N.: The germination phases of moss spores and their control by light. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 3, 1–60 (1966).Google Scholar
  28. Withbow, R. B., W. H. Klein, and V. Elstad: Action spectra of photomorphogenic induction and its photoinactivation. Plant Physiol. 32, 453–462 (1957).Google Scholar
  29. —, and A. P. Withrow: Generation, control and measurement of visible and near visible radiation. Radiation biology, vol. III (A. Hollaender, ed.), p. 125–258. New York: McGraw-Hill 1956.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1968

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bernard J. Nebel
    • 1
  1. 1.Radiation Biology LaboratorySmithsonian InstitutionWashington, D. C.

Personalised recommendations