Advertisement

Marine Biology

, Volume 50, Issue 1, pp 73–79 | Cite as

Studies on the reproductive cycles of the calcareous sponges Clathrina coriacea and C. blanca

  • M. F. Johnson
Article

Abstract

The reproductive cycles of two closely related calcareous sponges, Clathrina coriacea (Montagu, 1818) and C. blanca (Miklucho-Maclay, 1868), were studied to determine whether they were reproductively isolated. Populations of both species were sampled at Santa Catalina Island, California, USA, for 2.5 years. The reproductive period is from July to October in C. coriacea, and from April to August in C. blanca. Seawater temperature and habitat influence reproduction in both species. Fragmentation occurs in C. coriacea in the summer, while asexual reproduction by means of budding is seen in C. blanca throughout the year. The results of the study confirm that the two sponges are separate species.

Keywords

Calcareous Sponge Reproductive Cycle Asexual Reproduction Seawater Temperature 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Andronikov, V.B.: Heat resistance of gametes of marine invertebrates in relation to temperature conditions under which species exist. Mar. Biol. 30, 1–11 (1975)Google Scholar
  2. Bergquist, P., M. Sinclair and J. Hogg: Adaptation to intertidal existence: reproductive cycles and larval behavior in Demospongiae. Symp. zool. Soc. Lond. 25, 247–271 (1970)Google Scholar
  3. Burton, M.: Observations on littoral sponges, including supposed swarming of larvae, movement and coalescence in mature individuals, longevity and death. Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. 118, 893–915 (1949a)Google Scholar
  4. —: The non-sexual reproduction in sponges, with special reference to a collection of young Geodia. Proc. Linn. Soc. Lond. 160, 163–178 (1949b)Google Scholar
  5. Connes, R.: Contribution à l'étude de la proliferation par voie asexuée chez le Sycon. Bull. Soc. zool. Fr. 89, 188–195 (1968)Google Scholar
  6. —, G. Nègre et J. Paris: Etude morphologique, cytologique et sérologique de deux formes de Suberites massa de l'étang de Thau. Vie Milieu (Sér. A) 24, 213–224 (1974)Google Scholar
  7. Diaz, J.P.: Cycle sexuel de deux demosponges de l'étang de Thau: Suberites massa Nardo et Hymeniacidon caruncula Bowerbank. Bull. Soc. zool. Fr. 98, 145–156 (1973)Google Scholar
  8. Fell, P.E.: The reproduction of Haliclona loosanoffi and its apparent relationship to water temperature. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole 151, 108–125 (1976)Google Scholar
  9. Giese, A.C.: Comparative physiology: annual reproductive cycles of marine invertebrates. A. Rev. Physiol. 21, 547–576 (1959)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. — and J.S. Pearse: Introduction: general principles. In: Reproduction of marine invertebrates. Vol. I. Acoelomate and pseudocoelomate metazoans, pp 1–49. Ed. by A.C. Giese and J.S. Perse. New York: Academic Press 1974Google Scholar
  11. Gilbert, J.J.: Field experiments on sexuality in the freshwater sponge Spongilla lacustris. The control of oocyte production and the fate of unfertilized oocytes. J. exp. Zool. 188, 165–178 (1974)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hartman, W.D.: Natural history of the marine sponges of southern New England. Bull. Peabody Mus. nat. Hist. 12, 1–155 (1958)Google Scholar
  13. Hurst, W.C.: An ecological survey of Cave D, Big Fishermans Cove, Santa Catalina Island, 55 pp. University of Southern California 1969. (Unpublished m/s)Google Scholar
  14. Johnson, M.F.: Conspecificity in calcareous sponges: Clathrina coriacea (Montagu, 1818) and Clathrina blanca (Miklucho-Maclay, 1868), 442 pp. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Southern California 1976Google Scholar
  15. Kinne, O.: The effects of temperature and salinity on marine and brackish water animals. II. Salinity and temperature salinity combinations. Oceanogr. mar. Biol. A. Rev. 2, 281–339 (1964)Google Scholar
  16. Lévi, C.: Étude des Halisarca de Roscoff; embryologie et systématique des demosponges. Archs Zool. exp. gén. 93, 1–184 (1956)Google Scholar
  17. Lo Bianco, S.: Notizie biologiche reguardanti specialment il periodo de maturità sessuale degli animale del Golfo di Napoli. Mitt. zool. Stn Neapel 19, 513–761 (1909)Google Scholar
  18. Miklucho-Maclay, N.: Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Spongien. I. Über Guancha blanca, einen neuen Kalkschwamm. Jena. Z. Naturw. 4, 221–240 (1868)Google Scholar
  19. Minchin, E.A.: Note on the larva and post-larval development of Leucosolenia variabilis n. sp., with remarks on the development of other Asconidae. Proc. R. Soc. 60, 42–52 (1896)Google Scholar
  20. —: Eponges calcaires. La Clathrine coriace. In: Zoologie descriptive des invertébrés, Vol. I. pp 107–147. Ed. by L.M. Boutan. Paris: O. Doin 1900aGoogle Scholar
  21. —: Porifera. In: A treatise on zoology. Part II. The Porifera and Coelenterata, pp 1–178. Ed. by E.R. Lankester. London: Black 1900bGoogle Scholar
  22. Orton, J.H.: Preliminary account of a contribution to an evaluation of the sea. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 10, 312–326 (1914)Google Scholar
  23. —: Sea temperature, breeding and distribution in marine animals. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 12, 339–366 (1920)Google Scholar
  24. Sarà, M.: La nutrizione dell'ovocita in Calcispongie Omoceli. Annuar. Ist. Mus. Zool. Univ. Napoli 7, 1–30 (1955)Google Scholar
  25. —: Studio sui Poriferi di una grotta di marea del Golfo di Napoli. Archo zool. ital. 43, 203–280 (1958)Google Scholar
  26. —: Sulla coesistenza di specie strettamente affini di Poriferi in biotopi litorali. Boll. Zool. 26, 89–96 (1959)Google Scholar
  27. —: Aspetti e problemi di una ricerca sinecologica sui Poriferi del Golfo di Napoli. Boll. Zool. 27, 51–65 (1960)Google Scholar
  28. Siribelli, L.: Differenze nel ciclo sessuale di popolazioni conviventi di Axinella damicornis (Esper) ed Axinella verrucosa O.S. (Demospongiae). Annuar. Ist. Mus. Zool. Univ. Napoli 14, 1–8 (1962)Google Scholar
  29. Storr, J.F.: Ecology of Gulf of Mexico commercial spontes and its relation to the fishery. Spec. scient. Rep. U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv. (Fish.) 466, 1–73 (1964)Google Scholar
  30. Topsent, E.: Contribution à l'étude des Clionides. Archs Zool. exp. gén. (Sér. 2) 5, 1–166 (1887)Google Scholar
  31. Vasseur, G.: Reproduction asexuelle de la Leucosolenia botryoides (Ascandra variabilis). Archs Zool. exp. gén. 8, 59–66 (1879)Google Scholar
  32. Wells, H.W., M.J. Wells and I.E. Gray: Ecology of sponges in Hatteras Harbor, North Carolina. Ecology 45, 752–767 (1964)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. F. Johnson
    • 1
  1. 1.Environmental Research AssociatesLGL LimitedBryanUSA

Personalised recommendations