Human Genetics

, Volume 36, Issue 1, pp 13–23

Dermatoglyphic differences between 45,X and other chromosomal abnormalities of Turner syndrome

  • T. Reed
  • A. Reichmann
  • C. G. Palmer
Original Investigations

Summary

The dermatoglyphic findings in 87 patients with Turner syndrome are summarized. Comparisons are made between the 50 cases with 45,X karyotypes and the remaining 37 with different chromosomal abnormalities including 19 patients with an X long arm isochromosome cell line. The results indicate differences between the 45,X patients and the other chromosomal types which are in the same direction as the changes reported between Turner syndrome and normal controls.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ciovirnache, M., Stanescu, V., Ionescu, V., Floren, I., Grigorescu, A.: Les dermatoglyphes dans le syndrome de Turner. Rev. Roum. Endocrinol. 5, 287–301 (1968)Google Scholar
  2. Cummins, H., Midlo, C.: Fingerprints, palms and soles. New York: Dover 1961Google Scholar
  3. Forbes, A. P.: Fingerprints and palm prints (dermatoglyphics) and palmar flexion creases in gonadal dysgenesis, pseudohypoparathyroidism and Klinefelter's syndrome. New Engl. J. Med. 270, 1268–1277 (1964)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Holt, S. B., Lindsten, J.: Dermatoglyphic anomalies in Turner's syndrome. Ann. Hum. Genet. 28, 87–100 (1964)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Holt, S. B.: Dermatoglyphic patterns. In: Human variation and natural selection. Symposia for the Society for the Study of Human Biology, Vol. 13, pp. 159–178. New York: Halsted Press 1975Google Scholar
  6. Kerr, J. M., Hsu, L. Y. F., Workman, P., Hirschhorn, K.: Total finger ridge count and 45,X mosaicism (with and without Y chromosomes). Clin. Genet. 5, 68–71 (1974)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Matsunga, E., Matsuda, E., Ashizawa, K.: Sexual variation in finger pattern size and pattern types. Proc. VIII Int. Cong. Anthrop. Ethnol. Sci. 1, 224–225 (1968)Google Scholar
  8. Nie, N. H., Hull, C. H., Jenkins, J. G. Steinbrenner, K., Bent, D. H.: Statistical package for the social sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill 1975Google Scholar
  9. Palmer, C. G., Reichmann, A.: Chromosomal and clinical findings in 110 females with Turner syndrome. Hum. Genet. 35, 35–50 (1976)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Penrose, L. S.: Fingerprint pattern and the sex chromosomes. Lancet 1967I, 298–300Google Scholar
  11. Penrose, L. S.: Memorandum on dermatoglyphic nomenclature. Birth Defects, Original Article Series, D. Bergsma ed. Vol. 4, No. 3, New York: The National Foundation 1968Google Scholar
  12. Penrose, L. S., Loesch, D.: Dermatoglyphic sole patterns: a new attempt at classification. Hum. Biol. 41, 427–448 (1969a)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Penrose, L. S.: Dermatoglyphics, Sci. Amer. 221, 72–84 (1969b)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Pfeiffer, R. A., Kiera, W.: Dermatoglyphen bei Turner-syndrome. Acta Genet. Med. Gemellol. 17, 507–522 (1968)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Polani, P. E., Polani, N.: Chromosome anomalies, mosaicism and dermatoglyphic asymmetry. Ann. Hum. Genet. 32, 391–402 (1969)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Siegel, S.: Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill 1956Google Scholar
  17. Wolman, S. R., Horland, A. A., David, R.: Dermatoglyphics in 45,X/46,XX gonadal dysgenesis. Clin. Genet. 9, 441–443 (1976)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Reed
    • 1
  • A. Reichmann
    • 2
  • C. G. Palmer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Medical GeneticsIndiana University School of MedicineIndianapolisUSA
  2. 2.Hospital de Pediatria Dr. Pedro de ElizaldeBuenos AiresArgentina

Personalised recommendations