Marine Biology

, Volume 26, Issue 3, pp 225–233

Benthic-slope fishes found at 900m depth along a transect in the western N. Atlantic Ocean

  • D. F. Markle
  • J. A. Musick
Article

Abstract

The species composition of the benthic-slope fish fauna of the Middle Atlantic Bight is described from trawl catches taken from a depth of about 900 m in August, 1969. Two species associations and an intermediate area are apparent. The difference between the two associations is partially attributable to differences in species composition, but primarily to a difference in species dominance. The small number of samples precludes geographic and bathymetric delineation of these associations, as well as conclusions about their temporal stability. Diversity values appear to be relatively high for the benthic fishes of the upper slope, but comparison with values for temperate estuaries and coastal fishes indicates a narrow range for all of these habitats, and considerable overlap in values from the different environments. Environmental stability may be of less importance in determining the diversity of fish faunas than of benthic invertebrate faunas because of the mobility of fishes and ontogenetic changes in their habitat preference.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Bechtel, T.J. and B.J. Copeland: Fish species diversity indices as indicators of pollution in Galveston Bay, Texas. Contr. mar. Sci. Univ. Tex. 15, 103–132 (1970)Google Scholar
  2. Bigelow, H.B. and W.C. Schroeder: Deep water elasmobranchs and chimaeroids from the Northwestern Atlantic slope. Bull. Mus. comp. Zool. Harv. 112(2), 38–87 (1954)Google Scholar
  3. Bullis, H.R., Jr. and P.J. Struhsaker: Fish fauna of the western Caribbean upper slope. Q. Jl Fla Acad. Sci. 33, 43–76 (1970)Google Scholar
  4. Burke, V.: Revision of the fishes of the family Lipridae. Bull. U.S. natn. Mus. 150, 1–204 (1930)Google Scholar
  5. Castle, P.H.J.: Deep-sea eels: Family Synaphobranchidae. Galathea Rep. 2, 29–42 (1964)Google Scholar
  6. Dahlberg, M.D. and E.P. Odum: Annual cycles of species occurrence, abundance, and diversity in Georgia estuarine fish populations. Am. Midl. Nat. 83, 382–392 (1970)Google Scholar
  7. Goode, G.B. and T.H. Bean: Oceanic ichthyology. Deep-sea and pelagic fishes of the world. Spec. Bull. U.S. natn. Mus. 2, 1–553 (1896)Google Scholar
  8. Grassle, J.F.: Influence of environmental variation on species diversity in benthic communities of the continental shelf and slope, 194 pp. Ph.D. Dissertation, Duke University, Durham 1967Google Scholar
  9. Grey, M.: The distribution of fishes found below a depth of 2000 meters. Fieldiana, Zool. 36, 73–337 (1956)Google Scholar
  10. Haedrich, R.L. and M.H. Horn: The morid fish Halargyreus johnsonii from the New York Bight. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 27, 391–393 (1970)Google Scholar
  11. Horn, H.S.: Measurement of “overlap” in comparative ecological studies. Am. Nat. 100 (No. 914), 419–424 (1966)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lloyd, M. and R.J. Ghelardi: A table for calculating the equitability component of species diversity. J. Anim. Ecol. 33, 219–225 (1964)Google Scholar
  13. —, J.H. Zar, and J.R., Karr: On the calculation of information-theoretical measures of diversity. Am. Midl. Nat. 79, 257–272 (1968)Google Scholar
  14. MacArthur, R.H.: On the relative abundance of bird species. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 43, 293–295 (1957)Google Scholar
  15. Margalef, R.: Perspectives in ecological theory, 111 pp. Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1968Google Scholar
  16. Marshall, N.B.: The organization of deep-sea fishes. Stud. trop. Oceanogr., Miami 5, 473–479 (1967)Google Scholar
  17. Mead, G.W.: A history of South Pacific fishes. In: Scientific exploration of the South Pacific, pp 236–251. Ed. by W.S. Wooster Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences 1970Google Scholar
  18. Parr, A.E.: Deep sea eels, exclusive of larval forms. Bull. Bingham oceanogr. Coll. 3(5), 1–41 (1932)Google Scholar
  19. —, The Macrouridae of the western north Atlantic and Central American Seas. Bull. Bingham oceanogr. Coll. 10(1), 1–99 (1946)Google Scholar
  20. Pielou, E.C.: The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections. J. theor. Biol. 13, 131–144 (1966)Google Scholar
  21. Powles, P.M. and A.C. Kohler: Depth distribution of various stages of witch flounder (Glyptocephalus cynoglossus) off Nova Scotia and in the Gulf of St. Lawrence. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 27, 2053–2062 (1970)Google Scholar
  22. Sanders, H.L.: Benthic studies in Buzzards Bay. III. The structure of the soft-bottom community. Limnol. Oceanogr. 5, 138–153 (1960)Google Scholar
  23. —: Marine benthic diversity: a comparative study. Am. Nat. 102(No. 925), 243–282 (1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schroeder, W.C.: Report on the results of exploratory otter-trawling along the continental shelf and slope between Nova Scotia and Virginia during the summers of 1952 and 1953. Deep Sea Res. 3 (Suppl.: Pap. mar. Biol. Oceanogr.), 358–372 (1955)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. F. Markle
    • 1
  • J. A. Musick
    • 1
  1. 1.Virginia Institute of Marine ScienceGloucester PointUSA

Personalised recommendations