Oecologia

, Volume 53, Issue 3, pp 406–411 | Cite as

The effect of predation of western widow spiders (Araneae: Theridiidae) on harvester ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

  • William P. MacKay
Article

Summary

Spiders have been shown to be important predators on ant populations, although ant mortality may be low. Western widow spider (Latrodectus hesperus) predation on Pogonomyrmex rugosus ant nests is slight, less than 0.2% of the nest population per day. Yet, the ants respond by halting foraging temporarily and may even close the nest entrace with pebbles. If spiders are removed from such nests, the ants become active within 24 h and within five days foraging activity reaches higher levels than at any previous time of the year.

Ants have at least four responses to spiders predation: 1) Moving the nest entrace; 2) posting of “guards”; 3) attacking the spiders; 4) halting foraging. Pogonomyrmex rugosus practices the fourth response, although it results in losses of food intake into the nest. This is apparently the only option available. If the ants continue to forage, the spider density may increase, resulting in heavy mortality of the ants.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abalos JW (1980) Las arañas del género Latrodectus en la Argentina. Obra del Centenario del Museo de La Plata. 6:29–51Google Scholar
  2. Buren WF (1968) A review of the species of Crematogaster, sensu stricto, in North America (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) Part II, descriptions of new species. J Georgia Entomol Soc 3:91–121Google Scholar
  3. Carico J E (1978) Predatory behavior in Euryopis funebris (Hentz) (Aranea: Theridiidae) and the evolutinoary significance of web reduction. Symp Zool Soc Lond 42:51–58Google Scholar
  4. Clark WH, Comanor PL (1975) Removal of annual plants from the desert ecosystem by western harvester ants, Pogonomyrmex occidentalis. Environ Entomol 4:52–56Google Scholar
  5. Edwards GB, Carroll JF, Whitcomb WH (1974) Stoidis aurata (Araneae: Salticidae), a spider predator of ants. Florida Entomol 57:337–346Google Scholar
  6. Gentry JB (1974) Response to predation by colonies of the Florida harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex badius. Ecology 55:1328–1338Google Scholar
  7. Givens RP (1978) Dimorphic foraging strategies of a salticid spider (Phidippus audax). Ecology 59:309–321Google Scholar
  8. Glatz L (1967) Zur Biologie und Morphologie von Oecobius annulipes Lucas (Araneae, Oecobiidae). Z Morphol der Tiere. 61:185–214Google Scholar
  9. Heller G, (1976) Zum Beutefangverhalten der ameisenfressenden Spinne Callilepis nocturna (Arachnida: Araneae: Drassodidae). Entomol Germanica 3:100–103Google Scholar
  10. Hölldobler B (1970) Steatoda fulva (Theridiidae), a spider that feeds on harvester ants. Psyche 77:202–208Google Scholar
  11. Hölldobler B (1976) The behavioral ecology of mating in harvester ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Pogonomyrmex) Behav Ecol Sociobiol 1:405–423Google Scholar
  12. Kaston BJ (1970) Comparative biology of American black widow spiders. Trans San Diego Soc Nat Hist 16:33–82Google Scholar
  13. Levi HW (1957) The spider genera Crustulina and Steatoda in North America, Central America, and the West Indies (Araneae, Theridiidae). Bull Mus Comp Zool 177:367–424Google Scholar
  14. Levi HW (1977) The orb-weaver genera Metepeira, Kaira and Aculepeira in America north of Mexico (Araneae: Araneidae). Bull Mus Comp Zool 148:185–238Google Scholar
  15. Levieux J (1979) La nutrition des fourmis granivores III. Cycle d'activité et régime alimentaire en saison des pluies de Brachyponera senaarensis (Hym Formicidae Ponerinae) Fluctuations saisonnières. Insect Soc 26:232–239Google Scholar
  16. MacKay WP (1981) A comparison of the ecological energetics of three species of Pogonomyrmex harvester ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Dissertation, University of California at RiversideGoogle Scholar
  17. McCook HC (1880) The natural history of the agricultural ant of Texas. A monograph of the habits, architecture and structure of Pogonomyrmex barbatus. Lippincott and Co., Philadelphia 311 ppGoogle Scholar
  18. Menhinick EF (1967) Structure, stability, and energy flow in plants and arthropods in a Serica lespedeza stand. Ecol Monogr 37:255–272Google Scholar
  19. Moggridge JT (1873) Harvesting ants and trapdoor spiders with notes and observations on their habits and dwellings. London xi + 156 ppGoogle Scholar
  20. Palmgren P (1973) Contributions to the knowledge of the spider fauna of the eastern Alps. Commentat Biol Soc Sci Fenn 71:1–52Google Scholar
  21. Petal J, Breymeyer A (1969) Reduction of wandering spiders by ants in a Stellario-Deschampseitum meadow. Bull Acad Pol Sci Ser Sci Biol 17:239–244Google Scholar
  22. Petal J, Andrzejewska L, Breymeyer A, Olechowicz E (1971) Productivity investigation of two types of meadows in the Vistula Valley: X. The role of ants as predators in a habitat. Ekol Pol 19:213–222Google Scholar
  23. Schneider P (1971) Ameisenjagende Spinnen (Zodariidae) an Cataglyphis-Nestern in Afghanistan. Zool Anz Leipzig 187:199–201Google Scholar
  24. Shepard M, Gibson F (1972) Spider-ant symbiosis: Cotinusa spp. (Araneida: Salticidae) and Tapinoma melanocephalum (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Canad Entomol 104:1951–1954Google Scholar
  25. Shulov A (1940) On the biology of two Latrodectus spiders in Palestine. Proc Linnean Soc London 152:309–328Google Scholar
  26. Shulov A (1966) Biology and ecology of venomous animals in Isracl. Mem Inst Butantan Simp Internac 33:93–99Google Scholar
  27. Shulov A, Weissman A (1939) Notes on the life habitats and potency of the venom of the three Latrodectus spider species in Israel. Ecology 40:515–518Google Scholar
  28. Van Hook RI (1971) Energy and nutrient dynamics of spider and orthopteran populations in a grassland ecosystem. Ecol Monogr 41:1–26Google Scholar
  29. Weber NA (1957) Fungus-growing ants and their fungi: Cyphomyrmex costatus. Ecology 38:480–494Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • William P. MacKay
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of CaliforniaRiverside

Personalised recommendations