Advertisement

Planta

, Volume 125, Issue 1, pp 25–32 | Cite as

A photoperiodic response mediated by blue light in the brown alga Scytosiphon lomentaria

  • M. J. Dring
  • K. Lüning
Article

Summary

The crustose phase of Scytosiphon lomentaria (Lyngb.) J. Ag. persists indefinitely in 16 h of white light per day, but produces erect, cylindrical thalli vegetatively in 8-h days. The critical daylength for this short-day (SD) response is sharply defined, and, between 12 and 13 h, differences in daylength of only 15 min produce substantial differences in response. A significant response to SD can be induced by as few as 4 SD cycles, but 10–12 cycles are required to saturate the response and induce more than 90% of the plants to form thalli. The response to SD is completely inhibited by a 1-min light-break with a low irradiance of blue light, given in the middle of a 16-h dark period, but is unaffected by longer periods and higher irradiances of red or far-red light. There is good reciprocity between the irradiance and the length of a light-break with blue light, and 50% inhibition of the response to SD is induced by about 2 nE cm-2 at 449 nm. All attempts to reverse the inhibitory effects of blue light by subsequent irradiation with another wavelength have so far failed. These results indicate that phytochrome is not the photoreceptor pigment for this response, in spite of the similarity of the response in all other respects to the photoperiodic responses of flowering plants and other algae.

Keywords

Significant Response White Light Blue Light Flower Plant Brown Alga 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Abbreviations and Symbols

SD

short day

LD

long day. Horizontal above number of hours indicates dark period

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Dring, M. J.: Effects of daylength on growth and reproduction of the conchocelis-phase of Porphyra tenera. J. marine biol. Ass. 47, 501–510 (1967)Google Scholar
  2. Dring, M. J.: Photoperiodic effects in microorganisms. In: Photobiology of microorganisms, p. 345–368, Halldal, P., ed. London: Wiley 1970Google Scholar
  3. Dring, M. J.: Reproduction. In: Algal physiology and biochemistry, p. 814–837, Stewart, W. D. P., ed. Oxford: Blackwell 1974Google Scholar
  4. Dring, M. J., Lüning, K.: Induction of two-dimensional growth and hair formation by blue light in the brown alga Scytosiphon lomentaria. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 75, 107–117 (1975)Google Scholar
  5. Evans, L. T.: The induction of flowering, Melbourne: Macmillan 1970Google Scholar
  6. Fredericq, H.: Conditions determining effects of far-red and red irradiations on flowering response of Pharbitis nil. Plant Physiol. 39, 812–816 (1964)Google Scholar
  7. Hanke, J., Hartmann, K. M., Mohr, H.: Die Wirkung von “Störlicht” auf die Blütenbildung von Sinapis alba L. Planta (Berl.) 86, 235–249 (1969)Google Scholar
  8. Hartmann, K. M., Cohnen Unser, I.: Carotenoids and flavins versus phytochrome as the controlling pigment for blue-UV-mediated photoresponses. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 69, 109–124 (1973)Google Scholar
  9. Hillman, W. S.: Experimental control of flowering in Lemna. I. General methods. Photoperiodism in L. perpusilla 6746. Amer. J. Bot. 46, 466–473 (1959)Google Scholar
  10. Hillman, W. S.: Red light, blue light, and copper ion in the photoperiodic control of flowering in Lemna perpusilla 6746. Plant Cell Physiol. 6, 499–506 (1965)Google Scholar
  11. Ingold, C. T.: Effect of blue and yellow light during the later developmental stages of Sphaerobolus. Amer. J. Bot. 56, 759–766 (1969)Google Scholar
  12. Lüning, K., Dring, M. J.: The influence of light quality on the development of the brown algae Petalonia and Scytosiphon. Brit. phycol. J. 8, 333–338 (1973)Google Scholar
  13. O'Kelley, J. C., Durant, J. P., Stockdale, D. L.: Blue and green light effects, and their photoreversibility, upon zoospore production and the synchronized cycle in Protosiphon botryoides Klebs. Photochem. Photobiol. 20, 47–51 (1974)Google Scholar
  14. Parker, M. W., Hendricks, S. B., Borthwick, H. A., Scully, N. J.: Action spectrum for the photoperiodic control of floral initiation in short-day plants. Bot. Gaz. 108, 1–26 (1946)Google Scholar
  15. Rentschler, H.: Photoperiodische Induktion der Monosporenbildung bei Porphyra tenera Kjellm. (Rhodophyta-Bangiophyceae). Planta (Berl.) 76, 65–74 (1967)Google Scholar
  16. Rhodes, R. G., Connell, M. U.: The biology of brown algae on the Atlantic coast of Virginia. II. Petalonia fascia and Scytosiphon lomentaria. Chesapeake Science 14, 211–215 (1973)Google Scholar
  17. Takimoto, A.: Spectral dependence of different light reactions associated with photoperiodic response in Pharbitis nil. Bot. Mag. (Tokyo) 80, 213–220 (1967)Google Scholar
  18. Wilson, J. R., Schwabe, W. W.: Growth and dormancy in Lunularia cruciata (L.) Dum. III. The wavelengths of light effective in photoperiodic control. J. exp. Bot. 15, 368–380 (1964)Google Scholar
  19. Wynne, M. J.: Life history and systematic studies of some Pacific North American Phaeophyceae (brown algae). Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot. 50, 1–88 (1969)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. J. Dring
    • 1
  • K. Lüning
    • 2
  1. 1.Botany DepartmentThe Queen's University of BelfastBelfastU.K.
  2. 2.Biologische Anstalt HelgolandHelgolandFederal Republic of Germany

Personalised recommendations