, Volume 59, Issue 1, pp 58–61

Selection and migration in two distinct phenotypes of Littorina saxatilis in Sweden

  • Kerstin Janson
Original Papers


Two distinct phenotypes of the marine snail L. saxatilis, the ‘E morph’ from exposed rocky habitats, and the ‘S morph’ from nearby sheltered boulder shores, were released and survivors recaptured at 3-monthly intervals. Survival rate of E morphs was significantly higher than that of S morphs in the exposed habitat, whilst the revers was true for the sheltered site. When released in an environment intermediate between the exposed and sheltered habitats, both morphs survived equally well. However, snails native of this area, ‘I morphs’, survived better than both E and S morphs here. Recapture rates were highest in spring. Large snails of both phenotypes were selected against in the exposed habitat. In the sheltered environment, small E morph snails survived better than large ones, and both sizes of S morphs survived equally well. E morph individuals transplanted to a different exposed locality than their native one, had lower survival rates compared to native individuals. This effect was not found among transplanted S morph snails.

Distances migrated since time of release were on average greater in the sheltered than in the exposed habitat, and within the range of 1–4 m per 3 months, for both habitats. In a laboratory experiment, both morphs showed a shelter-seeking behaviour, most pronounced in the E morph.

It is proposed that the strong selection differences between the morphs within the two different habitats, the absence of a planktonic larval stage, and a restricted migration among juvenile and adult snails, maintain a genetic polymorphism within the species, responsibel for considerable parts of the large phenotypic differences observed between the two morphs E and S.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Behrens S (1972) The role of wave impact and desiccation in the distribution of Littorina sitkana Philippi, 1845. Veliger 15:129–132Google Scholar
  2. Endler JA (1977) Geographic variation, speciation, and clines. Princeton Univ Press, Princeton NJGoogle Scholar
  3. Feare CJ (1966) The winter feeding of the purple sandpiper. British Birds 59:165–179Google Scholar
  4. Gibb J (1956) Food, feeding habits and territory of the rock pipit (Anthus spinoletta). Ibis 98:506–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hamilton PV (1978) Intertidal distribution and long term movement of Littorina irrorata (Mollusca: Gatropoda). Mar Biol 46:49–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Janson K (1982) Genetic and environmental effects on the growth rate of Littorina saxatilis. Mar Biol 69:73–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Janson K (In press) Phenotypic differentiation in Littorina saxatilis Olivi (Mollusca, Prosobranchia) in a small area on the Swedish west coast. J moll StudGoogle Scholar
  8. Janson K, Sundberg P (in press). Multivariate morphometric analysis of two varieties of Littorina saxatilis Olivi from the Swedish west coast. Mar BiolGoogle Scholar
  9. Levene H (1953) Genetic equilibrium when more than one ecological niche is available. Am Nat 87:331–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Maynard-Smith J (1966) Sympatric speciation. Am Nat 100:637–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Naylor R, Begon M (1982) Variation within and between populations of Littorina nigrolineata Gray on Holy Island, Anglesey. J Conch 31:17–30Google Scholar
  12. Raffaelli DG (1979) The taxonomy of the Littorina saxatilis species-complex, with particular reference to the systematic status of Littorina patula Jeffereys. Zool J Linn Soc 65:219–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rollo DC, Wellington WG (1981) environmental orientation by terrestrial Mollusca with particular reference to homing behaviour. Can J Zool 59:225–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kerstin Janson
    • 1
  1. 1.Tjärnö Marine Biological LaboratoryStrömstadSweden

Personalised recommendations