Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 59, Issue 1, pp 27–39 | Cite as

Community development following removal of urchins, Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis, from the rocky subtidal zone of the St. Lawrence Estuary, Eastern Canada

  • John H. Himmelman
  • André Cardinal
  • Edwin Bourget
Original Papers

Summary

The role of sea urchins, Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis, in structuring the rocky subtidal community was examined at Anse aux Basques on the north shore of the St. Lawrence Estuary, Québec. In an experimental area, measuring 20x20 m and extending from 0 to 10 m in depth, we greatly reduced the intensity of urchin grazing by eliminating all urchins larger than 10 mm in test diameter. This area was observed for two years and compared to an adjacent control area. In the upper portion of the experimental area during the first month after urchin removal, mid-July to mid-August 1978, a dense diatom cover developed, and during the second month the diatoms were overgrown by Ulvaria obscura. After four months (November) an Alaria esculenta overstory was present from near low water level to 3 m deep. Community development was much slower at greater depths and it took a year for the Alaria zone to extend to 4–5 m deep, and two years to extend to 6 m deep. The low light penetration at this estuarine location was probably the main factor for the slow algal development at 6–10 m deep. At the end of the experiment Agarum cribrosum was second in importance after Alaria and was most common at 3 to 6 m in depth. Laminaria spp. was found in low numbers in the first year and did not show an increase during the second year. There was a dramatic increase in the number of species and abundance of algae in the experimental area. Also, there was a marked increase in many animal species, particularly Acmaea testudinalis, Mytilus edulis and Margarites helicinus, and a decrease in Metridium senile. By contrast, in the control area, the number of algal and invertebrate species remained low. In the experimental area a sharp increase in the growth rate of a cohort of very small urchins, which was not eliminated by our removal effort, demonstrated that there is strong intraspecific competition amongst urchins when the food supply is limited. In the St. Lawrence Estuary, there are few predators of urchins and the urchin dominated community appears to be a stable situation.

Keywords

Control Area Hydroid Lawrence Estuary Strongylocentrotus Droebachiensis Urchin Grazing 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson MR, Cardinal A, Larochelle J (1981) An alternate growth pattern for Laminaria longicruris. J Phycol 17:405–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Black R (1977) Population regulation in the intertidal limpet Patelloida alticostata (Angas, 1865) Oecologia (Berl) 30:9–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Breen PA, Mann KH (1976a) Destructive grazing of kelp by sea urchins in eastern Canada. J Fish Res Bd Can 33:1278–1283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Breen PA, Mann KH (1976b) Changing lobster abundance and the destruction of kelp beds by sea urchins. Mar Biol 34:137–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Breen PA, Carson TA, Foster JB, Stewart EA (1982) Changes in subtidal community structure associated with British Columbia sea otter transplants. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 7:13–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chapman ARO (1981) Stability of sea urchin dominated barren grounds following destructive grazing of kelp in St. Margaret's Bay, eastern Canada. Mar Biol 62:307–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Duggins DO (1980) Kelp beds and sea otters: an experimental approach. Ecology 61:447–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Estes JA, Smith NS, Palmisano JF (1978) Sea otter predation and community organization in the western Aleutian Islands, Alaska. Ecology 59:822–833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fletcher GL, Haggerty LC (1975) A survey of the inshore marine resources of St. Lewis Bay, Alexis Bay, St. Michaels Bay and Sandwich Bay, Labrador, with particular reference to Iceland scallops, mussels, clams, cockles, sea urchins and seaweed. Marine Sciences Research Laboratory, Tech Rep No 15, Memorial Univ Newfoundland, St. John's, Canada, 109 ppGoogle Scholar
  10. Fletcher GL, Pepper VA, Kean JC (1974a) A study of the biology of the Newfoundland sea urchin with emphasis on aspects important to the development of a fishery. Marine Sciences Research Laboratory, Tech Rep No 11, Memorial Univ Newfoundland, St John's, Canada, 41 ppGoogle Scholar
  11. Fletcher GL, Scaplen RP, Buggeln RC, Idler DR (1974b) A survey of the inshore marine resources of Forteau Bay, l'Anse au Loup Bay, Pinware Bay and Red Bay, Labrador, with particular emphasis on shellfish, sea urchins and seaweeds. Marine Sciences Research Laboratory, Tech Rep No 9, Memorial Univ Newfoundland, St John's, Canada, 33 ppGoogle Scholar
  12. Fowler BM, Fletcher GL (1975) A survey of the marine inshore resources of Bonavista Bay and Belle Bay, Fortune Bay, with particular reference to giant scallops, mussels, clams, sea urchins and seaweed. Marine Sciences Research Laboratory, Tech Rep No 17, Memorial Univ Newfoundland, St John's, Canada, 131 ppGoogle Scholar
  13. Hay ME (1981) Hervibory, algal distribution, and the maintenance of between-habitat diversity on a tropical fringing reef. Am Nat 118:520–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Himmelman JH (1969) Some aspects of the ecology of Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis in eastern Newfoundland. MSc thesis. Memorial Univ Newfoundland, St John's, Canada, 159 ppGoogle Scholar
  15. Himmelman JH (1980) The role of the green sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis, in the rocky subtidal region of New-foundland. In: Pringle JD, Sharp GJ, Caddy JF (eds) Proceedings of the workshop on the relationship between sea urchin grazing and commercial plant/animal harvesting. Can Tech Rep Fish Aquat Sci No 954, pp 92–119Google Scholar
  16. Himmelman JH, Steele DH (1971) Foods and predators of the green sea urchin Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis in New-foundland waters. Mar Biol 9:315–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Himmelman J, Axelsen F, Lavergne Y (1979) Étude des populations et du cycle sexuel de l'Oursin vert au Québec. Ministère de l'Industrie, du Commerce et du Tourisme, Québec, Direction générale des pêches maritimes, Cahiers d'Information No 93, 38 ppGoogle Scholar
  18. Himmelman JH, Lavergne Y, Axelsen F, Cardinal A, Bourget E (1983a) Sea urchins in the Saint Lawrence Estuary: their abundance, site-structure, and suitability for commercial exploitation. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 40:476–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Himmelman JH, Lavergne Y, Axelsen F (1983b) L'abondance et la structure des populations d'Oursin vert, Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis, dans l'estuaire du Sant-Laurent. Ministère de l'Agriculture, des Pêcheries et de l'Alimentation, Québec, Direction générale des pêches maritimes, Cahiers d'Information (in press)Google Scholar
  20. Hooper R (1980) Observations on algal-grazer interactions in Newfoundland and Labrador. In: Pringle JD, Sharp GJ, Caddy JF (eds) Proceedings of the workshop on the relationship between sea urchin grazing and commercial plant/animal harvesting. Can Tech Rept Fish Aquat Sci No 954, 120–124Google Scholar
  21. John DM, Pople W (1973) The fish grazing of rocky shore algae in the Gulf of Guinea. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 11:81–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jones NS, Kain JM (1967) Subtidal algal colonization following the removal of Echinus. Helgo wiss Meeresunters 15:460–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kitching JA, Ebling FJ (1961) The ecology of Lough Ine. XI. The control of algae by Paracentrotus lividus (Echinoidea). J Anim Ecol 30:373–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Larson BR, Vadas RL, Keser M (1980) Feeding and nutritional ecology of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis in Maine, USA. Mar Biol 59:49–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lee RKS (1966) Development of marine benthic algal communities on Vancouver Island, British Columbia. In: Taylor RL, Ludwig RA (eds) The evolution of Canada's flora, Univ Toronto Press, Toronto, Canada, pp 100–120Google Scholar
  26. Lubehenco J (1978) Plant species diversity in a marine intertidal community: importance of herbivore food preference and algal competitive abilities. Am Nat 112:23–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lubchenco J, Gaines SD (1981) A unified approach to marine plant-herbivore interactions. I. Populations and communities. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 12:405–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. MacKay AA (1976) The sea urchin roe industry on New Brunswick's Bay of Fundy coast. Marine Research Associates report to the New Brunswick Department of Fisheries, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada 92 ppGoogle Scholar
  29. Mann KH (1972) Ecological energetics of the sea-weed zone in a marine bay on the Atlantic coast of Canada. II. Productivity of the seaweeds. Mar Biol 14:199–209Google Scholar
  30. Mann KH (1973) Seaweeds: their productivity and strategy for growth. Science 182:975–981PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mann KH (1977) Destruction of kelp-beds by sea urchins: A cyclical phenomenon or irreversible degradation? Helgo wiss Meeresunters 30:455–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McLean JH (1962) Sublittoral ecology of kelp beds of the open coast near Carmel, California. Biol Bull 122:95–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Miller RJ, Colodey AG (1983) Widespread mass mortality of the green sea urchin in Nova Scotia, Canada. Mar Biol 73:263–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Neish IC (1973) The distribution of sea urchins in Charlotte County, New Brunswick. Report to the New Brunswick Department of Fisheries and Environment, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada, 22 ppGoogle Scholar
  35. Niell FX (1979) Structure and succession in rocky algal communities of a temperate intertidal system. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 36:185–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Paine RT (1966) Food web complexity and species diversity. Am Natur 100:65–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Paine RT, Vadas RL (1969) The effects of grazing by sea urchins, Strongylocentrotus spp., on benthic algal populations. Limnol Oceanogr 14:710–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pringle JD, Sharp GJ, Caddy JF (eds). (1980) Proceedings of the workshop on the relationship between sea urchin grazing and commercial plant/animal harvesting. Can Tech Rept Fish Aquat Sci No 954, 273 ppGoogle Scholar
  39. Randall JE (1961) Overgrazing of algae by herbivorous marine fishes. Ecology 42:812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sammarco PW, Levinton JS, Ogden JC (1974) Grazing and control of coral reef community structure by Diadema antillarum Philippi (Echinodermata: Echinoidea): a preliminary study. J Mar Res 32:47–53Google Scholar
  41. Sandnes OK, Gulliksen B (1980) Monitoring and manipulation of a sublittoral hard bottom biocoenosis in Balsfjord, northern Norway. Helgo Meeresunters 33:467–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Simenstad CA, Estes JA, Kenyon KW (1978) Aleuts, sea otters, and alternate stable-state communities. Science 200:403–411PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sinclair MM (1977) Phytoplankton distributions in the Lower St. Lawrence Estuary. PhD thesis, Univ Ca San Diego, 200 ppGoogle Scholar
  44. Templeman W (1936) The influence of temperature, salinity, light and food conditions on the survival and growth of the larvae of the lobster (Homarus americanus). J Biol Bd Can 2:485–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Vadas RL (1968) The ecology of Agarum and the kelp bed community. PhD thesis, Univ Wash, Seattle, 280 ppGoogle Scholar
  46. Vadas RL (1977) Preterential feeding: an optimization strategy in sea urchins. Ecol Monogr 47:337–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vance RR (1979) Effects of grazing by the sea urchin, Centrostephanus coronatus, on prey community composition. Ecology 60:537–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Velimirov B, Field JG, Griffiths CL, Zoutendyk P (1977) The ecology of kelp bed communities in the Benguela upwelling system. Helgo wiss Meeresunters 30:495–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wharton WG, Mann KH (1981) Relationship between destructive grazing by the sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis, and the abundance of American lobster, Homarus americanus, on the Atlantic coast of Nova Scotia. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 38:1339–1349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wilson OT (1925) Some experimental observations on marine algal successions. Ecology 6:303–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • John H. Himmelman
    • 1
    • 2
  • André Cardinal
    • 1
  • Edwin Bourget
    • 1
  1. 1.Département de biologie and GIROQ (Groupe interuniversitaire de Recherches océanographiques du Québec)Université LavalQuébecCanada
  2. 2.Recherche sur la pêcheEcosystème marin, Pêches et Océans CanadaCanada

Personalised recommendations