Marine Biology

, Volume 57, Issue 2, pp 127–133 | Cite as

Larval dispersal of a deep-sea hydrothermal vent bivalve from the Galápagos Rift

  • R. A. Lutz
  • D. Jablonski
  • D. C. Rhoads
  • R. D. Turner
Article

Abstract

The prodissoconch morphology of an unclassified mytilid from a hydrothermal vent on the Galápagos Rift indicates the presence of a planktotrophic larval stage with longrange dispersal capabilities. Recorded abyssal currents are probably sufficient to transport such larvae hundreds of kilometers. It is suggested that one or more aspects of the unusual biological or physico-chemical conditions (such as high microbial densities, elevated water temperatures, and hydrogen sulfide concentrations) encountered at vents, provide a stimulus to larval settlement. Such a behavioral response, perhaps coupled with a “gregarious settling” response, would provide a means of concentrating relatively sedentary organisms in and around these restricted, geographically isolated regions.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Allen, J. A.: Evolution of the deep-sea protobranch bivalves. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. (Ser. B) 284, 387–401 (1978)Google Scholar
  2. Allen, J. A. and H. L. Sanders: Studies on deep-sea Protobranchia (Bivalvia): the families Siliculidae and Lametilidae. Bull. Mus. comp. Zool. Harv. 145, 263–310 (1973)Google Scholar
  3. Arnaud, P. M.: Contribution à la bionomie marine benthique des régions antarctiques et subantarctiques. Téthys 6, 465–656 (1974)Google Scholar
  4. Bayne, B. L.: Growth and the delay of metamorphosis of the larvae of Mytilus edulis (L.). Ophelia 2, 1–47 (1965)Google Scholar
  5. Bayne, B. L.: The gregarious behavior of the larvae of Ostrea edulis L. at settlement. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 49, 327–335 (1969)Google Scholar
  6. Bayne, B. L.: Some morphological changes that occur at the metamorphosis of the larvae of Mytilus edulis. Proc. 4th Eur. mar. Biol. Symp. 1971. 259–280 (1971) (Ed. by D. J. Crisp. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
  7. Bayne, B. L.: The biology of mussel larvae. In: Marine mussels: their ecology and physiology, pp 81–120. Ed. by B. L. Bayne. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1976Google Scholar
  8. Bernard, F.: Recherches ontogeniques et morphologiques sur la coquille des lamellibranches. I. Taxodontes et anisomyaires. Annls Sci. nat. (Sér. Zool.) 8, 1–208 (1898)Google Scholar
  9. Bouchet, P.: Mise en évidence de stades larvaires planctoniques chez des gastéropodes prosobranches de étages bathyal et abyssal. Bull. Mus. Hist. nat., Paris (Zool.) 277, 947–972 (1976)Google Scholar
  10. Carriker, M. R.: Ecological observations on the distribution of oyster larvae in New Jersey estuaries. Ecol. Monogr. 21, 19–38 (1951)Google Scholar
  11. Carriker, M. R.: Interrelation of functional morphology, behavior, and autecology in early stages of the bivalve Mercenaria mercenaria. J. Elisha Mitchell Scient. Soc. 77, 168–241 (1961)Google Scholar
  12. Carriker, M. R. and R. E. Palmer: Ultrastructural morphogenesis of prodissoconch and early dissoconch valves of the oyster Crassostrea virginica. Proc natn. Shellfish. Ass. 69, 103–128 (1979)Google Scholar
  13. Chanley, P. E.: Larval development of the hooked mussel, Brachidontes recurvus Rafinesque (Bivalvia: Mytilidae) including a literature review of larval characteristics of the Mytilidae. Proc. natn. Shellfish. Ass. 60, 86–94 (1970)Google Scholar
  14. Chanley, P. E. and J. D. Andrews: Aids for identification of bivalve larvae of Virginia. Malacologia 11, 45–119 (1971)Google Scholar
  15. Chia, F. S.: Classification and adaptive significance of developmental patterns in marine invertebrates. Thalassia jugosl. 10, 121–130 (1974)Google Scholar
  16. Cole, H. A. and E. W. Knight-Jones: The setting behavior of larvae of the European oyster, Ostrea edulis L., and its influence on methods of cultivation and spat collection. Fishery Invest., Lond. (Ser. II) 17(3), 1–39 (1949)Google Scholar
  17. Corliss, J. B. and R. D. Ballard. Oases of life in the cold abyss. Natn. geogr. Mag. 152, 441–453 (1977)Google Scholar
  18. Corliss, J. B., J. Dymond, L. I. Gordon, J. M. Edmond, R. P. von Herzen, R. D. Ballard K. Green, D. Williams, A. Bainbridge, K. Crane and T. H. van Andel: Submarine thermal springs on the Galápagos Rift. Science, N.Y. 203, 1073–1083 (1979)Google Scholar
  19. Crisp, D. J.: Factors influencing the settlement of marine invertebrate larvae. In: Chemoreception in marine organisms, pp 177–265. Ed. by. P. T. Grant and A. M. Mackie, New York: Academic Press 1974Google Scholar
  20. Crisp, D. J. and J. S. Ryland: Influence of filming and of surface texture on the settlement of marine organisms. Nature, Lond. 185, p. 119 (1960)Google Scholar
  21. De Schweinitz, E. H. and R. A. Lutz: Larval development of the northern horse mussel, Modiolus modiolus, (L.), including a comparison with the larvae of Mytilus edulis L. as an aid in planktonic identification. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole 150, 348–360 (1976)Google Scholar
  22. Giesel, J. T.: Reproductive strategies as adaptations to life in temporally heterogeneous environments. A. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 7, 57–79 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grassle, J. F.: Slow recolonisation of deep-sea sediment. Nature, Lond. 265, 618–619 (1977)Google Scholar
  24. Grassle, J. F., C. J. Berg, J. J. Childress., J. P. Grassle, R. R. Hessler, H. J. Jannasch, D. M. Karl, R. A. Lutz, T. J. Mickel, D. C. Rhoads, H. L. Sanders, K. L. Smith, G. N. Somero, R. D. Turner, J. H. Tuttle, P. J. Walsh and A. J. Williams: Galápagos '79: initial findings of a deep-sea biological quest. Oceanus 22 (2), 2–10 (1979)Google Scholar
  25. Grassle, J. F. and H. L. Sanders: Life histories and the role of disturbance. Deep-Sea Res. 20, 643–649 (1973)Google Scholar
  26. Gray, J. S.: Animal-sediment relationships. Oceanogr. mar. Biol. A. Rev. 12, 223–261 (1974)Google Scholar
  27. Gunter, G.: Temperature. Mem. geol. Soc. Am. 67, 159–184 (1957)Google Scholar
  28. Hidu, H.: Gregarious setting in the American oyster, Crassostrae virginica Gmelin. Chesapeake Sci. 10, 85–92 (1969)Google Scholar
  29. Hidu, H., W. G. Valleau and F. P. Veitch: Gregarious setting in European and American oysters — response to surface chemistry vs. waterborne pheromones. Proc. natn. Shellfish. Ass. 68, 11–16 (1978)Google Scholar
  30. Jablonski, D. and R. A. Lutz: Interpretation of larval shell morphology of fossil mollusks. A. Mtg geol. Soc. Am. Abstr. 11, p. 86 (1979)Google Scholar
  31. Jablonski, D. and R. A. Lutz: Molluscan larval shell morphology: ecological and paleontological applications. In: Skeletal growth of aquatic organisms, Ed. by D. C. Rhoads and R. A. Lutz. New York: Plenum Press (In press) 1980Google Scholar
  32. Jannasch, H. W., K. Eimhjellen, C. O. Wirsen and A. Farmanfarmaian: Microbial degradation of organic matter in the deep sea. Science, N.Y. 171, 672–675 (1971)Google Scholar
  33. Kiseleva, G. A.: Factors stimulating larval metamorphosis of the lamellibranch, Brachyodontes lineatus (Gmelin). Zool Zh. 45, 1571–1573 (1966)Google Scholar
  34. Knudsen, J.: The systematics, and biology of, abyssal and hadal Bivalvia. Galathaea Rep. 11, 1–241 (1970)Google Scholar
  35. LaBarbera, M.: Larval and post-larval development of five species of Miocene bivalves (Mollusca). J. Paleont. 48, 256–277 (1974)Google Scholar
  36. Lonsdale, P.: Clustering of suspension-feeding macrobenthos near abyssal hydrothermal vents at oceanic spreading centers. Deep-Sea Res. 24, 857–863 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Loosanoff, V. L., H. C. Davis and P. E. Chanley: Dimensions and shapes of larvae of some marine bivalve mollusks. Malacologia 4, 351–435 (1966)Google Scholar
  38. Lutz, R. A. and H. Hidu: Hinge morphogenesis in the shells of larval and early post-larval mussels (Mytilus edulis L. and Modiolus modiolus (L.)). J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 59, 111–121 (1979)Google Scholar
  39. Lutz, R. A., H. Hidu and K. G. Drobeck: Acute temperature increase as a stimulus to setting in the American oyster, Crassostrea virginica (Gmelin). Proc. natn. Shellfish. Ass. 60, 68–71 (1970)Google Scholar
  40. Lutz, R. A. and D. Jablonski: Larval bivalve shell morphometry: a new paleoclimatic tool? Science, N.Y. 202, 51–53 (1978)Google Scholar
  41. McCall, P. L.: Community patterns and adaptive strategies of the infaunal benthos of Long Island Sound. J. mar. Res. 35, 221–266 (1977)Google Scholar
  42. Meadows, P. S. and J. I. Campbell: Habitat selection by aquatic invertebrates. In: Advances in marine biology, pp 271–382. Ed. by F. S. Russell and M. Yonge. London: Academic Press (1972)Google Scholar
  43. Menge, B. A.: Effect of wave action and competition on brooding and reproductive effort in the seastar, Leptasterias, hexactis. Ecology 55, 84–93 (1974)Google Scholar
  44. Menge, B. A.: Brood or broadcast? The adaptive significance of different reproductive strategies in the two intertidal sea stars Leptasterias hexactis and Pisaster ochraceus. Mar. Biol. 31, 87–100 (1975)Google Scholar
  45. Menzies, R. J. and R. Y. George: Temperature effects on behavior and survival of marine invertebrates exposed to variations in hydrostatic pressure. Mar. Biol. 13, 155–159 (1972)Google Scholar
  46. Mileikovsky, S. A.: Types of larval development in marine bottom invertebrates, their distribution and ecological significance: a re-evaluation. Mar. Biol. 10, 193–213 (1971)Google Scholar
  47. Mileikovsky, S. A.: Types of larval development in marine bottom invertebrates: an integrated ecological scheme. Thalassia jugosl. 10, 171–179 (1974)Google Scholar
  48. Ockelmann, K. W.: Development types in marine bivalves and their distribution along the Atlantic coast of Europe. Proc. 1st Eur. malac. Congr. 1962 25–35 (1965). (Ed. by. L. R. Cox and J. F. Peake. London: Conchological Society of Great Britain and Ireland & Malacological Society of London).Google Scholar
  49. Pearse, J. S.: Slow developing demersal embryos and larvae of antarctic sea star Odontaster validus. Mar. Biol. 3, 110–116 (1969)Google Scholar
  50. Rau, G. H. and J. I. Hedges: Carbon-13 depletion in a hydrothermal vent mussel: suggestion of a chemosynthetic food source. Science, N.Y. 203, 648–649 (1979)Google Scholar
  51. Rees, C. B.: The identification and classification of lamellibranch larvae. Hull Bull. mar. Ecol. 3, 73–104 (1950)Google Scholar
  52. Sanders, H. L. and J. A. Allen: Studies on deep-sea Protobranchia (Bivalvia); prologue and Pristiglomidae. Bull. Mus. comp. Zool. Harv. 145, 237–262 (1973)Google Scholar
  53. Sanders, H. L. and J. A. Allen: Studies on the deep-sea Protobranchia: the family Tindariidae and the genus Pseudotindaria. Bull. Mus. comp. Zool. Harv. 148, 23–59 (1977)Google Scholar
  54. Sanders, H. L. and R. R. Hessler Ecology of the deep-sea benthos. Science, N.Y. 163, 1419–1424 (1969)Google Scholar
  55. Scheltema, R. S.: Metamorphosis of the veliger larvae of Nassarius obsoletus (Gastropoda) in response to bottom sediment. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole 120, 92–109 (1961)Google Scholar
  56. Scheltema, R. S.: Larval dispersal as a means of genetic exchange between geographically separated populations of shallowwater benthic marine gastropods. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole 140, 284–322 (1971)Google Scholar
  57. Scheltema, R. S.: Reproduction and dispersal of bottom dwelling deep-sea invertebrates: a speculative summary. In: Barobiology and the experimental biology of the deep sea, pp 58–66. Ed. by R. W. Brauer. Chapel Hill, North Carolina: University of North Carolina 1972Google Scholar
  58. Scheltema R. S.: Biological interactions determining larval settlement of marine invertebrates. Thalassia jugosl.. 10, 263–296 (1974)Google Scholar
  59. Scheltema, R. S.: Dispersal of marine invertebrate organisms: paleobiogeographic and biostratigraphic implications. In: Concepts and methods of biostratigraphy, pp 73–108. Ed. by E. G. Kauffman and J. E. Hazel. Strondsburg, Pennsylvania: Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross 1977Google Scholar
  60. Scheltema, R. S.: On the relationship between, dispersal of pelagic veliger larvae and the evolution of marine prosobranch gastropods. In: Marine organisms: genetics, ecology and evolution, pp 303–322. Ed. by. B. Battaglia, and J. A. Beardmore. New York: Plenum Press 1978Google Scholar
  61. Scheltema, R. S.: Mode of reproduction and inferred dispersal of prosobranch gastropods in the geologic past: consequences for biogeography and species evolution. A. Mtg geol. Soc. Am. Abstr. 11, p. 126 (1979)Google Scholar
  62. Sellmer, G. P.: Functional morphology and ecological life history of the gem clam, Gemma gemma (Eulamellibranchia Veneridae). Malacologia 5, 137–223 (1967)Google Scholar
  63. Simpson, R. D.: The reproduction of some littoral molluscs from Macquarie Island (sub-Antarctic). Mar. Biol. 44, 125–142 (1977)Google Scholar
  64. Smith, K. L., Jr. and J. M. Teal: Deep-sea benthic community respiration: an in situ study at 1850 meters. Science, N.Y. 179, 282–283 (1973)Google Scholar
  65. Thiel, H.: The size structure of the deep-sea benthos Int. Revue ges. Hydrobiol. 60, 575–606 (1975)Google Scholar
  66. Thorson, G.: Reproductive and larval ecology of marine bottom invertebrates. Biol. Rev. 25, 1–45 (1950)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Turekian, K. K., J. K. Cochran and Y. Nozaki: Growth rate of a clam from the Galápagos Rise hot spring field using natural radionuclide ratios. Nature, Lond. 280, 385–387 (1979)Google Scholar
  68. Turner, R. D.: Wood-boring bivalves, opportunistic species in the deep sea. Science N.Y. 180, 1377–1379 (1973)Google Scholar
  69. Turner, R. D.: Wood, mollusks and deep-sea food chains. Bull. Am. malac. Un. Inc. 1976, 13–17 (1977)Google Scholar
  70. Vermeij, G. J.: Biogeography and adaptation: patterns of marine life, 332 pp. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press 1978Google Scholar
  71. Waller, T. R.: Formation of a posterodorsal notch in larval oyster shells and the prodissoconch-I/II, boundary in the Bivalvia. Bull. Am. malac. Un. Inc. 1978, 55–56 (1979)Google Scholar
  72. Weiss, R. F., P. Lonsdale, J. E. Lupton, A. E. Bainbridge and H. Craig: Hydrothermal plumes in the Galápagos Rift. Nature, Lond. 267, 600–603 (1978)Google Scholar
  73. Werner, B.: Über die Entwicklung und Artunterscheidung von Muschellarven des Nordseeplanktons, unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Schalenentwicklung. Zool. Jb. (Abt. Anat. Ont. Tiere) 66, 1–54 (1939)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. A. Lutz
    • 1
  • D. Jablonski
    • 2
  • D. C. Rhoads
    • 2
  • R. D. Turner
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Oyster Culture, New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station, Cook CollegeRutgers UniversityNew BrunswickUSA
  2. 2.Department of Geology and GeophysicsYale UniversityNew HavenUSA
  3. 3.Museum of Comparative ZoologyHarvard UniversityCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations