Marine Biology

, Volume 49, Issue 2, pp 161–167 | Cite as

Microbial associations in sponges. I. Ecology, physiology and microbial populations of coral reef sponges

  • C. R. Wilkinson


Illumination, current strength and physical turbulence influence the distribution of 4 tropical sponges. Three sponges with cyanobacteria in exposed tissues grow only in poen shallow habitats: Pericharax heteroraphis in moderate-current, lowturbulence regions on the reef slope; Jaspis stellifera in low-current, moderate-turbulence regions of the outer reef flat; and Neofibularia irata in moderate-current, high-turbulence areas below the reef crest. Ircinia wistarii contains no cyanobacteria and occurs in deeper, strong-current, high-turbulence regions. N. irata agressively overgrows neighbouring corals and its growth form is influenced by the current strength. The sponges efficiently filter bacteria from the water. The efficiency is related to the aquiferous structure, particularly the size of choanocyte chambers, and is unrelated to the existing bacterial populations in sponge tissue. The numbers of bacteria associated with the sponges are proportional to the sponge mesohyl density, with the dense sponges J. stellifera and I. wistarii containing many bacteria whereas P. heteroraphis is not dense and has few bacteria.


Sponge Coral Reef Reef Flat Reef Slope Current Strength 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Bryan, P.G.: Growth rate, toxicity, and distribution of the encrusting sponge Terpios sp. (Hadromerida: Suberitidae) in Guam, Mariana Islands. Micronesica 9, 237–242 (1973)Google Scholar
  2. Buss, L.W.: Better living through chemistry: the relationship between allelochemical interactions and competitive networks. In: Aspects of sponge biology, pp 315–327. Ed. by F.W. Harrison and R.W. Cowden. New York: Academic Press 1976Google Scholar
  3. Dayton, P.K., G.A. Robilliard, R.T. Paine and L.B. Dayton: Biological accommodation in the benthic community at McMurdo Sound, Antarctica. Ecol. Monogr. 44, 105–128 (1974)Google Scholar
  4. Goodbody, I.: Inhibition of the development of a marine sessile community. Nature, Lond. 190, 282–283 (1961)Google Scholar
  5. Grassle, J.F.: Variety in coral reef communities. In: Biology and geology of coral reefs. Vol. II. Biology I, pp 247–270. Ed. by O.A. Jones and R. Endean. New York: Academic Press 1973Google Scholar
  6. Jackson, J.B.C. and L.W. Buss: Allelopathy and spatial competition among coral reef invertebrates. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 72, 5160–5163 (1975)Google Scholar
  7. Jannasch, H.W. and G.E. Jones: Bacterial populations in sea water as determined by different methods of enumeration. Limnol. Oceanogr. 4, 128–139 (1959)Google Scholar
  8. Jeffrey, S.W.: Quantitative thin-layer chromatography of chlorophylls and carotenoids from marine algae. Biochim. biophys. Acta 162, 271–285 (1968)Google Scholar
  9. — and G.F. Humphrey: New spectrophotometric equations for determining chlorophylls a, b, c 1 and c 2 in higher plants, algae and natural phytoplankton. Biochem. Physiol. Pfl. 167, 191–194 (1975)Google Scholar
  10. Lang, J.: Interspecific aggression by scleractinian corals. 1. The rediscovery of Scolymia cubensis (Milne, Edwards & Haime). Bull. mar. Sci. 21, 952–959 (1971)Google Scholar
  11. Pianka, E.R.: On r- and K-selection. Am. Nat. 104, 592–597 (1970)Google Scholar
  12. Reiswig, H.M.: Particle feeding in natural populations of three marine demosponges. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole 141, 568–591 (1971a)Google Scholar
  13. In situ pumping activities of tropical Demospongiae. Mar. Biol. 9, 38–50 (1971b)Google Scholar
  14. — Population dynamics of three Jamaican Demospongiae. Bull. mar. Sci. 23, 191–226 (1973)Google Scholar
  15. — Water transport, respiration and energetics of three tropical marine sponges. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 14, 231–249 (1974)Google Scholar
  16. — Bacteria as food for temperate-water sponges. Can. J. Zool. 53, 582–589 (1975)Google Scholar
  17. Sarà, M.: Ultrastructural aspects of the symbiosis between two species of the genus Aphanocapsa (Cyanophyceae) and Ircinia variabilis (Demospongiae). Mar. Biol. 11, 214–221 (1971)Google Scholar
  18. Sieburth, J. McN.: Seasonal selection of estuarine bacteria by water temperature. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 1, 98–121 (1967)Google Scholar
  19. Sorokin, Y.I.: Microbiological aspects of the productivity of coral reefs. In: Biology and geology of coral reefs. Vol. II. Biology I, pp 17–45. Ed. by O.A. Jones and R. Endean. New York: Academic Press 1973Google Scholar
  20. Stewart, W.D.P. and M.J. Daft: Microbial pathogens of cyanophycean blooms. In: Advances in aquatic microbiology, Vol. 1. pp 177–218. Ed. by M.R. Droop and H.W. Jannasch. London: Academic Press 1977Google Scholar
  21. Vacelet, J.: Etude en microscopie électronique de l'association entre une cyanophycée chroococcale et une éponge du genre Verongia. J. Microscopie 12, 363–380 (1971)Google Scholar
  22. — Etude en microscopie électronique de l'association entre bactéries et spongiaires du genre Verongia (Dictyoceratida). J. Microscopie Biol. cell. 23, 271–288 (1975)Google Scholar
  23. Vogel, S.: Current-induced flow through the sponge Halichondria. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole 147, 443–456 (1974)Google Scholar
  24. Wilkinson, C.R.: Description of two Demospongiae, one being toxic, from the Great Barrier Reef. Téthys 8 (In press). (1978a)Google Scholar
  25. —: Microbial associations in sponges. II. Numerical analysis of sponge and water bacterial populations. Mar. Biol. 49, 169–176 (1978b)Google Scholar
  26. —: Microbial associations in sponges. III. Ultrastructure of the in situ associations in coral reef sponges. Mar. Biol. 49, 177–185 (1978c)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. R. Wilkinson
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyUniversity of QueenslandSt. LuciaAustralia
  2. 2.Department of BotanyUniversity of BristolBristolEngland

Personalised recommendations