From failure to success: Changing the experience of adult learners of mathematics
- 91 Downloads
- 8 Citations
Abstract
For the last few years, the author has been part of a team developing a mathematics course for students most of whom are women, many of whom are black and all of whom are attempting to gain entry to a teacher-training course by successfully completing a one year re-entry course. It is a requirement that teacher-training students should have attained a suitable standard in mathematics. Further Education colleges where re-entry courses are sited have a sad history of student failure in mathematics. The theoretical environment in which the development of this course took place is described in order to place the course in context. In particular, attention is drawn to the re-definition of mathematics which encourages student enquiry and experimentation in order to establish a basis for understanding the subject, and to the teaching/learning model which creates an environment of respect and confidence. The roles of students and staff in a learning environment of this kind are discussed. Particular attention is paid to the attitudes and feelings of the students and the effects on their expectations.
Keywords
Learning Environment Education College Adult Learner Student Enquiry Suitable StandardPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Brown, S. I. and M. I. Walter: 1983, The Art of Problem Posing, Franklin Institute Press.Google Scholar
- Buerk D.: 1982, ‘An experience with some able women who avoid mathematics’, For the Learning of Mathematics 3(2), 19–24.Google Scholar
- Burton, L.: 1984, Thinking Things Through, Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Burton, L. and R. Townsend: 1985, ‘Girl-friendly mathematics’, Mathematics Teaching, 111.Google Scholar
- Buxton, L.: 1981, Do You Panic about Mathematics?, Heinemann Education.Google Scholar
- The Cockcroft Committee: 1982, Mathematics Counts, H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
- French J. and P. French: 1984, ‘Gender imbalances in the primary classroom: An interactional account’, Educational Research 26, 2.Google Scholar
- Gordon M.: 1978, ‘Conflict and liberation: Personal aspects of the mathematics experience’, Curriculum Inquiry 8, 3, John Wiley for the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.Google Scholar
- Graham, A. and A. Roberts: 1982, Sums for Mums (priv. pub.).Google Scholar
- H.M.I.: 1985, Mathematics from 5–16, H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
- Kelly, G. A.: 1970, ‘A brief introduction to personal construct theory’, in D. Bannister (ed.), Perspectives in Personal Construct Theory, Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Mason, J., L. Burton, and K. Stacey: 1982, Thinking Mathematically, Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
- Papert, S.: 1980, Mindstorms, Children, Computers and Powerful Ideas, Harvester.Google Scholar
- Perry, G.: 1968, Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years, Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
- Plunkett S.: 1981, ‘Fundamental questions for teachers’, For the Learning of Mathematics 2, 2.Google Scholar
- Polyani, M.: 1974, Personal Knowledge, Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
- Rowland, S.: 1984, The Enquiring Classroom, Falmer Press.Google Scholar
- Spender, D.: 1982, Invisible Women: The Schooling Scandal, Writers and Readers Publishing Co-operative Society.Google Scholar
- The Swann Committee: 1985, Education for All, H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
- Thom, R.: 1973, ‘Modern mathematics: Does it exist?’, in A. G. Howson, Developments in Mathematics Education, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar