Spatial organization of a desert rodent community: food addition and species removal
- 74 Downloads
- 30 Citations
Summary
From 1977 through 1983 we conducted experiments on a desert rodent community where supplemental seeds were added or certain rodent species and ants were removed from 0.25-ha fenced plots in a Chihuahuan Desert site in southeastern Arizona, USA. In this paper we examine the patterns of microhabitat use relative to vegetative cover by 11 rodent species. The results show that: i) removal of the largest seed-eating species, Dipodomys spectabilis, produced the most pervasive and dramatic shifts in microhabitat use by the remaining rodent species; ii) adding seeds or removing ants had little effect on the spatial use of microhabitats by rodents in this community; and iii) non-granivores were just as likely as granivores to shift microhabitat use when other granivores were removed. We believe these results indicate that both food and foraging microsites are limited but the relegation of subdominant species to lesspreferred microhabitats by the large Dipodomys spectabilis is the major factor underlying the spatial organization of this community. Results also demonstrate that strong interactions among species increase the probability that pathways of indirect interactions through intermediary species are important; these complex linkages may include species that overlap little in food preferences.
Key words
Desert Rodent community Food additionPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Blaustein AR, Riser AC (1974) Dominance relationships of the dark kangaroo mouse (Microdipodops megacephalus) and the little pocket mouse (Perognathus longimembris) in captivity. Great Basin Natur 34:312–314Google Scholar
- Bowers MA (1986) Geographic comparison of microhabitats used by three heteromyids in response to rarefaction. J Mamm 67:46–52Google Scholar
- Bowers MA, Brown JH (1981) Coexistence of desert rodents: chance or community structure. Ecology 63:391–400Google Scholar
- Brown JH (1975) Geographical ecology of desert rodents. In: Cody ML, Diamond JM (eds) Ecology and evolution of communities. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
- Brown JH, Lieberman GA (1973) Resource utilization and coexistence of seed-eating rodents in sand-dune habitats. Ecology 54:788–797PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brown JH, Munger JC (1985) Experimental manipulation of a desert rodent community: food addition and species removal. Ecology 66:1545–1563Google Scholar
- Brown JH, Davidson DW, Munger JC, Inouye RS (1986) Experimental community ecology the desert granivore system. In: Diamond JM, Case TJ (eds) Community ecology. Harper and Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Brown JH, Davidson DW, Reichman OJ (1979) Granivory in desert ecosystems. Ann Rev Ecol System 10:201–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Congdon J (1974) Effect of habitat quality on distributions of three sympatric species of desert rodents. J Mamm 55:659–662Google Scholar
- Frye RJ (1983) Experimental field evidence of interspecific aggression between two species of kangaroo rats (Dipodomys) Oecologia (Berlin) 59:74–78Google Scholar
- Harris JH (1984) An experimental analysis of desert rodent foraging ecology. Ecology 65:1579–1584Google Scholar
- Hoover KD, Whitford WG, Flavill P (1977) Factors influencing the distribution of two species of Perognathus. Ecology 58:877–884Google Scholar
- Lemen CA, Freeman PW (1976) Interference competition in a heteromyid community in the Great Basin of Nevada, USA. Oikos 46:390–396Google Scholar
- Lemen C, Rosenzweig ML (1978) Microhabitat selection in two species of heteromyid rodents. Oecologia (Berlin) 33:127–135Google Scholar
- MacArthur RH, Pianka EC (1966) On optimal use of a patchy environment. Amer Natur 100:603–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- M'Closkey RT (1978) Nich seperation and assembly in four species of Sonoran Desert rodents. Amer Natur 112:683–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Munger JC, Brown JH (1981) Competition in desert rodents: an experiment with semipermeable membranes. Science 211:510–512Google Scholar
- Price MV (1978) The role of microhabitat in structuring desert rodent communities. Ecology 59:910–921Google Scholar
- Price MV (1984) Microhabitat use in rodent communities: predator avoidance or food partitioning. Netherlands J Zool 34:63–80Google Scholar
- Price MV, Brown JH (1983) Patterns of morphology and resource use in North American desert rodent communities. Great Basin Natur Memiors 7:117–134Google Scholar
- Price MV, Waser NM (1985) Microhabitat use by heteromyid rodents: effects of artificial seed patches. Ecology 66:211–219Google Scholar
- Price MV, Waser NM, Bass TA (1984) Effects of moonlight on microhabitat use by desert rodents. J Mamm 65:353–356Google Scholar
- Rebar C, Conley W (1983) Interactions in microhabitat use between Dipodomys ordii and Onychomys leucogaster. Ecology 64:894–899Google Scholar
- Reichman OJ (1980) Factors influencing foraging in desert rodents. In: Kamil A, Sargent (eds) Foraging behavior: ecological, ethological, and physiological approaches. Garland STM Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Rosenzweig ML (1973) Habitat selection experiments with a pair of coexisting heteromyid species, Ecology 54:111–117Google Scholar
- Rosenzweig ML, Winakur J (1969) Population ecology of desert rodent communities: habitats and environmental complexity. Ecology 50:558–572Google Scholar
- Schoener TW (1971) The theory of foraging strategies. Ann Rev Ecol System 2:369–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Siegel S (1956) Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Wondolleck JT (1978) Forage-area seperation and overlap in heteromyid rodents. J Mamm 59:510–518Google Scholar