Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 14, Issue 4, pp 317–326 | Cite as

Intrinsic rate of natural increase: The relationship with body size

  • Tom Fenchel
Article

Summary

The relationship between previously published values of “the intrinsic rate of natural increase” (r m ) and body weight is studied. When organisms covering a wide range of body weights are compared, a correlation is found which can be described by the equation r m =aW n where r m is the intrinsic rate of natural increase per day and W is the average body weight in grams; a is a constant which takes three different values for unicellular organisms and heterotherm and homoiotherm animals respectively. The constant n has a value of about-0.275 for all three groups. This result is compared to the previously found relationship between the metabolic rate per unit weight and body size. It is shown that r m can be inter-preted as the productivity of an exponentially growing population and thus must correlate with metabolic rate. The values of the constants a and n, however, show that for each of the three groups, unicellular organisms, heterotherms and homoiotherms the ratio of energy used for maintenance to that used for production increases with increasing body size and that the evolution from protozoa to metazoa and the evolution from heterotherm to homoiotherm animals in both cases resulted in not only an increased metabolic rate, as shown previously, but also in a decreased population growth efficiency. It is shown that the increase in reproductive potential of homoiotherms relative to that of heterotherms is due to a shorter prereproductive period in the former group.

Previous estimates of r m for different species and comparisons between these values in relation to their ecology are discussed in context with the found “r m -body weight” relationship. Attempts to show that such comparisons will be more meaningful when body size is included in the considerations are made. It is suggested that the found relationship may represent the maximum values r m can take rather than average values for all species, since it is likely that the species used for laboratory population-studies are biased in favor of species with high reproductive potentials.

Keywords

Body Weight Body Size Population Growth Metabolic Rate Unit Weight 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altman, P. L., Dittmer, D. S. (Eds.): Growth. Biological Handbooks. Washington, D. C.: Fed. Amer. Soc. Exper. Biol. 1962Google Scholar
  2. Birch, L. C.: The intrinsic rate of natural increase of an insect population. J. Anim. Ecol. 17, 15–26 (1948)Google Scholar
  3. Birch, L. C.: Experimental background to the study of the distribution and abundance of insects. I. The influence of temperature, moisture and food on the innate capacity for increase of three grain beetles. Ecology 34, 698–711 (1953)Google Scholar
  4. Brock, T. O.: Principles of microbial ecology, 306 pp. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall 1966Google Scholar
  5. Clarke, B.: Density-dependent selection. Amer. Naturalist 106, 1–13 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cody, M. L.: A general theory of clutch size. Evolution 20, 174–184 (1966)Google Scholar
  7. Cole, L. C.: The population consequences of life history phenomena. Quart. Rev. Biol. 29, 103–137 (1954)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. DeWitt, R. M.: The intrinsic rate of natural increase in a pond snail (Physa gyrina Say). Amer. Naturalist 88, 353–359 (1954)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Edmondson, W. T.: Reproductive rates of rotifers in natural populations. Mem. Ist. Ital. Idrobiol. 12, 21–77 (1960)Google Scholar
  10. Evans, F. C., Smith, F. E.: The intrinsic rate of natural increase for the human louse, Pediculus humanus. Amer. Naturalist 86, 299–310 (1952)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fenchel, T.: The ecology of marine microbenthos III. The reproductive potentials of ciliates. Ophelia 5, 123–136 (1968)Google Scholar
  12. Frank, P. W., Boll, C. D., Kelly, R. W.: Vital statistics of laboratory cultures of Daphnia pulex De Geer as related to density. Physiol. Zool. 30, 287–305 (1957)Google Scholar
  13. Gadgil, M., Bossert, W. H.: Life historical consequences of natural selection. Amer. Naturalist 104, 1–24 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gadgil, M., Solbrig, O. T.: The concept of r- and K-selection: evidence from wild flowers and some theoretical considerations. Amer. Naturalist 105, 14–31 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hairston, N. G., Tinkle, T. W., Wilbur, H. M.: Natural selection and the parameters of population growth. J. Wildlife Manage 34, 681–690 (1970)Google Scholar
  16. Hemmingsen, A. M.: Energy metabolism as related to body size and respiratory surfaces, and its evolution. Rep. Steno Hosp., Copenh. 9, 1–110 (1960)Google Scholar
  17. Heron, A. C.: Population ecology of a colonizing species: The pelagic tunicate Thalia democratica. I. Individual growth rate and generation time. Oecologia (Berl.) 10, 269–293 (1972a)Google Scholar
  18. Heron, A. C.: Population ecology of a colonizing species: The pelagic tunicate Thalia democratica. II. Population growth rate. Oecologia (Berl.) 10, 294–312 (1972b)Google Scholar
  19. King, C. E.: Food, age, and the dynamics of a laboratory population of rotifers. Ecology 48, 111–128 (1967)Google Scholar
  20. Leslie, P. H.: On the use of matrices in certain population mathermatics. Biometrika 33, 183–212 (1945)Google Scholar
  21. Leslie, P. H.: The intrinsic rate of increase and the overlap of successive generations in a population of guillemots. J. Anim. Ecol. 25, 291–301 (1966)Google Scholar
  22. Leslie, P. H., Park, T.: The intrinsic rate of natural increase of Tribolium castaneum Herbst. Ecology 30, 469–477 (1949)Google Scholar
  23. Leslie, P. H., Ranson, R. M.: Mortality, fertility and rate of natural increase in the vole (Microtus agrestis). J. Anim. Ecol. 32, 221–231 (1940)Google Scholar
  24. Leslie, P. H., Tener, J. S., Vizoso, M., Chitty, H.: The longevity and fertility of the Orkney vole Microtus orcadensis, as observed in the laboratory. Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. 125, 115–125 (1955)Google Scholar
  25. Lewontin, R. C.: Selection for colonizing ability. In: H. G. Baker, G. L. Stebbins, Eds., The genetics of colonizing species. New York: Academic Press 1965Google Scholar
  26. MacArthur, R. H.: Some generalized theorems of natural selection. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.) 48, 1893–1897 (1962)Google Scholar
  27. McNeill, S., Lawton, J. H.: Annual production and respiration in animal populations. Nature (Lond.) 225, 472–474 (1970)Google Scholar
  28. Mertz, D. B.: The mathermatical demography of the California condor population. Amer. Naturalist 105, 437–453 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Muus, B. J., Dahlstrøm, P.: Europas ferskvandsfisk, København: G. E. C. Gads Forlag 1967Google Scholar
  30. Oliff, W. D.: The mortality, fecundity and intrinsic rate of natural increase of the multimammate mouse, Rattus (Mastomys) natalensis (Smith) in the laboratory. J. Anim. Ecol. 22, 217–226 (1953)Google Scholar
  31. Petrusewicz, K., MacFadyen, A.: Productivity of terrestrial animals. IBP Handbook No. 13. Oxford: Blackwell 1970Google Scholar
  32. Pfadt, R. E., Smith, D. S.: Net reproductive rate and capacity for increase of the migratory grasshopper, Melanoplus sanguinipes sanguinipes (F.). Acrida 1, 149–165 (1972)Google Scholar
  33. Pianka, E.: On r and K selection. Amer. Naturalist 104, 592–597 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Root, R. B.: An estimate of the intrinsic rate of natural increase in the planarian, Dugesia tigrina. Ecology 41, 369–372 (1960)Google Scholar
  35. Roughgarden, J.: Density-dependent natural selection. Ecology 52, 453–468 (1971)Google Scholar
  36. Smith, F. E.: Quantitative aspects of population growth. In: Dynamics of growth processes, E. Boell, Ed., p. 274–294. Princeton: Princeton University Press 1954Google Scholar
  37. Smith, F. E.: Population dynamics in Daphnia magna. Ecology 44, 651–663 (1963)Google Scholar
  38. Stiven, A. E.: The effect of temperature and feeding on the intrinsic rate of increase of three species of hydra. Ecology 43, 325–328 (1962)Google Scholar
  39. Zeuthen, E.: Body size and metabolic rate in the animal kingdom. C. R. Lab. Carlsberg, Sér. chim. 26, 15–161 (1947)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tom Fenchel
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Ecology, Zoological InstituteUniversity of ÅarhusÅarhus

Personalised recommendations