Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 55, Issue 2, pp 178–184 | Cite as

The pollination biology of Calypso bulbosa var. Americana (Orchidaceae): Initial deception of bumblebee visitors

  • Thomas C. Boyden
Original Papers

Summary

The orchid Calypso bulbosa var. americana has deceptive flowers that provide no rewards for visitors. Near Banff, Alberta, the flowering period of this species is synchronized with the emergence of its pollinators, large bumblebee queens, in late spring. Calypso flowers appear to rely on the initial attraction and deception of newly-emerged naive bumblebees for pollination. Indirect evidence suggests that individual bees subsequently learn to avoid these flowers and that avoidance is learned quite rapidly. Avoidance behavior by pollinators is obviously detrimental to sexual reproduction in Calypso. This negative effect appears to be offset by the large number of seeds produced in plants which are effectively pollinated. A test of the hypothesis that Calypso flowers mimic flowers of the shooting star, Dodecatheon radicatum (Primulaceae) failed to provide evidence for mimicry.

Keywords

Indirect Evidence Sexual Reproduction Avoidance Behavior Late Spring Flowering Period 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ackerman JD (1975) Reproductive biology of Goodyera oblongifolia (Orchidaceae). Madroño 23:191–198Google Scholar
  2. Ackerman JD (1981) Pollination biology of Calypso bulbosa var. occidentalis (Orchidaceae): A food-deception system. Madroño 28:101–110Google Scholar
  3. Baker H (1975) Sugar concentrations in nectars from hummingbird flowers. Biotropica 7:37–41Google Scholar
  4. Boyden TC (1976) Butterfly palatability and mimicry: Experiments with Ameiva lizards. Evolution 30:73–81Google Scholar
  5. Dafni A, Ivri Y (1979) Pollination ecology, of, and hybridization between Orchis coriophora L. and O. collina Sol ex Russ (Orchidaceae) in Israel. New Phytol 83:181–187Google Scholar
  6. von Frisch K (1971) Bees, their vision, chemical senses and language, 2nd edn. Cornell Univ Press, Ithaca, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Gumprecht R (1977) Seltsame Bestäubungsvorgänge bei Orchideen. Die Orchidee, Beilage zu Heft 28:5–23Google Scholar
  8. Heinrich B (1979) Bumblebee economics. Harvard Univ Press, Cambridge MAGoogle Scholar
  9. Kullenberg B, Bergstrom G (1976) The pollination of Ophrys orchids. Bot Not 129:11–20Google Scholar
  10. Menzel R, Erber J (1978) Learning and memory in bees. Sci Am 239:102–110Google Scholar
  11. Meeuse BJD (1961) The story of pollination. Ronald Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Mosquin T (1970) The reproductive biology of Calypso bulbosa (Orchidaceae). Can Field Nat 84:291–296Google Scholar
  13. Mosquin T (1971) Competition for pollinators as a stimulus for the evolution of flowering time. Oikos 22:398–402Google Scholar
  14. Stoutamire WP (1971) Pollination in temperate American orchids. In: Corrigan MJ (ed) Proc Sixth World Orchid Conf. Sydney, Australia, pp 233–243Google Scholar
  15. Thien L, Marcks B (1972) The floral biology of Arethusa bulbosa, Calopogon tuberosus, and Pogonia ophioglossoides (Orchidaceae). Can J Bot 50:2319–2325Google Scholar
  16. Vogel S (1978) Evolutionary shifts from reward to deception in pollen flowers. In Richards AJ (ed) The pollination of flowers by insects. Academic Press, New York, pp 89–96Google Scholar
  17. Wollin H (1975) Kring nornans biologi. Fauna och Flora 70:89–98Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas C. Boyden
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BotanyUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations