, Volume 65, Issue 1, pp 145–152

Mammalian predation on termites: tests with the burrowing mouse (Oxymycterus roberti) and its prey

  • Kent H. Redford
Original Papers


A laboratory study of mammalian predation on termites was conducted using the burrowing mouse (Oxymycterus roberti) and eight species of central Brazilian termites. The results of preference trials demonstrate that Oxymycterus discriminate between termite species and that the eight prey species fall into three groups: least preferred, most-preferred and a group of intermediate preference.

Preferences of Oxymycterus are not explained by the size or the nutritional quality of the termite species. However, three measures of termite soldier-based defense do correlate highly with preference. Termite species with soldiers exhibiting a mechanical or mixed defense are greatly preferred by Oxymycterus over species with soldiers exhibiting a chemical based defense. This chemical defense by termites is effective in severely limiting predation by small mammals.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Baker R, Walmsley S (1982) Soldier defense secretions of the South American termites Cortaritermes silvestri, Nasutitermes sp. nD. and Nasutitermes kemneri. Tetrahedron 38:1899–1910Google Scholar
  2. Blum MW, Jones TH, Howard DF, Overal WL (1982) Biochemistry of termite defenses: Coptotermes, Rhinotermes and Cornitermes species. Comp Biochem Physiol 71B:731–733Google Scholar
  3. Bodot P (1969) Composition des colonies de termites: ses fluctuations au cours du temps. Ins Soc 16:39–54Google Scholar
  4. Borchert M, Hansen RL (1983) Effects of flooding and fire on valley side wet campo rodents. Rev Brasil Biol 43:229–240Google Scholar
  5. Coles HR (1980) Defensive strategies in the ecology of neotropical termites. Ph.D. dissertation, Southampton UniversityGoogle Scholar
  6. Coles de Negret HR, Redford KH (1982) The biology of nine termite species (Termitidae: Isoptera) from the cerrado of central Brazil. Psyche 89:81–106Google Scholar
  7. Cornelius D, Dandrifosse G, Jeniaux C (1976) Chitinolytic enzymes of the gastric mucosa of Perodicticus potto (Primate Prosimian): purification and enzyme specificity. Int J Biochem 7:445–448Google Scholar
  8. Curio E (1976) The ethology of predation. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. DeFoliart GR (1975) Insects as a source of protein. Bull Entomol Soc Am 21:161–163Google Scholar
  10. Deligne J (1965) Morphologie et functionnement des mandibules chez les soldats des termites. Biol Gab 1:179–186Google Scholar
  11. Deligne J, Quennedey A, Blum MS (1981) The enemies and defense mechanisms of termites. In: Hermann HR (ed) Social insects, vol 2. Academic Press, New York, pp 2–76Google Scholar
  12. Glander KE (1981) Feeding patterns in mantled howling monkeys. In: Kamil AC, Sargent TD (eds) Foraging behavior. Garland Press, New York, pp 231–257Google Scholar
  13. Himmelman JH, Carefoot TH (1975) Seasonal changes in caloric value of Pacific coast seaweeds, and their significance to some marine invertebrate herbivores. J Exp Mar Ecol 18:139–151Google Scholar
  14. Jaeger RG, Barnard DE (1981) Foraging tactics of a terrestrial salamander: choice of diet in structurally simple environments. Am Nat 117:639–664Google Scholar
  15. Lewis AR (1982) Selection of nuts by gray squirrels and optimal foraging theory. Am Midl Nat 107:250–257Google Scholar
  16. Lubin YD, Montgomery GG (1981) Defenses of Nasutitermes termites (Isoptera, Termitidae) against tamandua anteaters (Edentata, Myrmecophagidae). Biotropica 13:66–76Google Scholar
  17. Mathews AGA (1977) Studies on termites from the Mato Grosso State, Brazil. Acad Bras Cien Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
  18. Mill AE (1982) Foraging and defensive behaviour in neotropical termites. Ph.D. dissertation. University of SouthamptonGoogle Scholar
  19. Mill AE (1983) Behavioural and toxic effects of termite defensive secretions on ants. Physiol Entomol 8:413–418Google Scholar
  20. Milton K (1979) Factors influencing leaf choice by howler monkeys: a test of some hypotheses of food selection by generalist herbivores. Am Nat 114:362–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Owen-Smith N, Nouvelle P (1982) What a clever ungulate should eat. Am Nat 119:151–178Google Scholar
  22. Prestwich GD (1979a) Chemical defense by termite soldiers. J Chem Ecol 5:459–480Google Scholar
  23. Prestwich GD (1979b) Interspecific variation in the defense secretions of Nasutitermes soldiers. Biochem Syst Ecol 7:211–221Google Scholar
  24. Redford KH (1983) Mammalian myrmecophagy: feeding, foraging and food preference. Ph.D. dissertation. Harvard UniversityGoogle Scholar
  25. Redford KH (in press a) Ants and termites as food: patterns of mammalian myrmecophagy. Ann Rev Ecol SystGoogle Scholar
  26. Redford KH (in press b) The termitaria of Cornitermes cumulans: their role in determining a potential keystone species. BiotropicaGoogle Scholar
  27. Redford KH, Dorea J (in press) The nutritional value of invertebrates with emphasis on ants and termites as food for mammals. J Zool (London)Google Scholar
  28. Reichman OJ (1977) Optimization of diets through food preference by heteromyid rodents. Ecology 58:454–457Google Scholar
  29. Rissing SW (1981) Prey preferences in the desert horned lizard: influence of prey foraging method and aggressive behavior. Ecology 63:1031–1040Google Scholar
  30. Sands WA (1965) Mound population movements and fluctuations in Trinervitermes ebenerianus Sjostedt (Isoptera, Termitidae, Nasutitermitinae). Ins Soc 12:49–58Google Scholar
  31. Smith CC, Follmer D (1972) Food preference of squirrels. Ecology 53:82–91Google Scholar
  32. Sokal RR, Rolf FJ (1969) Biometry. W.H. Freeman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  33. Sokal RR, Sneath PHA (1963) Principles of numerical taxonomy. W.H. Freeman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  34. Stuart AM (1969) Social behavior and communication. In: Krishna K, Weesner FM (eds) Biology of termites, vol 1. Academic Press, New York, pp 193–232Google Scholar
  35. Thorne BL (in press) Inter- and intraspecific analyses of caste ratios in colonies of Nasutitermes corniger and N. ephratae in Panama (Isoptera; Termitidae; Nasutitermitinae). J Anim EcolGoogle Scholar
  36. Wheelwright NT (1982) Fruit characteristics and the foraging behavior of tropical fruit-eating birds. Ph.D. dissertation. Univ WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  37. Willson MF, Harmeson JC (1973) Seed preference and digestible efficiency of cardinals and song sparrows. Condor 75:225–233Google Scholar
  38. Wilson EO (1971) The insect societies. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  39. Zach R, Falls JB (1978) Prey selection by captive ovenbirds. J Anim Ecol 47:929–943Google Scholar
  40. Zaret TM (1980) Predation and freshwater communities. Yale University Press, New Haven, ConnecticutGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kent H. Redford
    • 1
  1. 1.Museum of Comparative ZoologyHarvard UniversityCambridgeUSA
  2. 2.Florida State MuseumUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations