Oecologia

, Volume 62, Issue 3, pp 344–350

On the analysis of phenological overlap

  • Theodore H. Fleming
  • Brian L. Partridge
Original Papers

Summary

We briefly review current methods for detecting nonrandom patterns in the temporal overlap of flowering and fruiting curves. We discuss the assumptions behind these methods and propose a new method of analysis using computer simulations to measure n-wise, rather than pairwise, temporal overlap. We quantify the extent to which observed n-wise overlap differs from minimum possible n-wise overlap and apply our method to several data sets to test the hypothesis that interspecific competition for animal visitors has produced flowering curves whose overlap is less than that expected by chance. Results of our analyses provide little support for this hypothesis but suggest alternate criteria by which the species may be selected.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alatalo RV (1982) Bird species distribution in the Galapagos and other archipelagoes: competition or chance? Ecology 63:881–887Google Scholar
  2. Anderson RC, Schelphont S (1980) Phenological patterns among tall grass prairie plants and their implications for pollinator competition. Amer Midl Natur 104:253–263Google Scholar
  3. Augsberger CK (1981) Reproductive synchrony of a tropical shrub: experimental studies on effects of pollinators and seed predators on Hybanthus prunifolius (Violaceae). Ecology 62:775–788Google Scholar
  4. Beattie AJ, Breedlove DE, Ehrlich PR (1973) The ecology of the pollinators and predators of Frasera speciosa. Ecology 54:81–91Google Scholar
  5. Borchert R (1980) Phenology and ecophysiology of tropical trees: Erythrina poeppigrana O.F. Cook. Ecology 61:1065–1074Google Scholar
  6. Brown JH, Kodric-Brown A (1978) Convergence, competition, and mimicry in a temperate community of hummingbird-pollinated flowers. Ecology 60:1022–1035Google Scholar
  7. Connor EF, Simberloff DS (1979) The assembly of species communities: chance or competition? Ecology 60:1132–1140Google Scholar
  8. Feinsinger P, Whelan RJ, Kiltie RA (1981) Some notes on community composition: assembly by rules or by dartboards? Bull Ecol Soc Amer 62:19–23Google Scholar
  9. Fleming TH Ecological relationships among five sympatric Piper (Piperaceae) species. Ecology (in press)Google Scholar
  10. Gleeson SK (1981) Character displacement in flowering phenologies. Oecologia (Berlin) 51:294–295Google Scholar
  11. Grant PR, Abbott I (1980) Interspecific competition island biogeography and null hypotheses. Evolution 34:332–341Google Scholar
  12. Heinrich B (1976a) Flowering phenologies: bog, woodland, and disturbed habitats. Ecology 57:890–899Google Scholar
  13. Heinrich B (1976b) Resource partitioning among some eusocial insects: bumblebees. Ecology 57:874–889Google Scholar
  14. Heithaus ER, Fleming TH, Opler PA (1975) Patterns of foraging and resource utilization in several species of bats in a seasonal tropical community. Ecology 56:841–854Google Scholar
  15. Hurlbert, SH (1970) Flower number, flowering time, and reproductive isolation among ten species of Solidago (Compositae). Bull Torrey Botan Club 97:189–195Google Scholar
  16. Janzen DH (1978) Seeding patterns of tropical trees. In: PB Tomlinson, MH Zimmermann (eds), Tropical trees as living systems. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge pp 83–128Google Scholar
  17. Mosquin T (1971) Competition for pollinators as a stimulus for the evolution of flowering time. Oikos 22:398–402Google Scholar
  18. Parrish JAD, Bazzaz FA (1979) Difference in pollination niche relationships in early and late successional plant communities. Ecology 60:597–610Google Scholar
  19. Pianka ER (1974) Niche overlap and diffuse competition. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 71:2141–2145PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Pleasants JM (1980) Competition for bumblebee pollinators in rocky Mountain plant communities. Ecology 61:1446–1459Google Scholar
  21. Poole RW, Rathcke BJ (1979) Regularity, randomness, and aggregation in flowering phenologies. Science 203:470–471Google Scholar
  22. Rabinowitz D, Rapp JK, Sork VL, Rathcke BJ, Reese GA, Weaver JC (1981) Phenological properties of wind- and insect-pollinated prairie plants. Ecology 62:49–56Google Scholar
  23. Reich PB, Borchert R (1982) Phenology and ecophysiology of the tropical tree, Tabebuia neocrysantha (Bignoniaceae). Ecology 63:294–299Google Scholar
  24. Schemske DW (1981) Floral convergence and pollinator sharing in two bee-pollinated tropical herbs. Ecology 62:946–954Google Scholar
  25. Schoener TW (1983) Size differences among sympatric, bird-eating hawks: a woldwide survey. In: D. Strong, D. Simberloff, L. Abele (eds), Ecological communities: conceptual issues and the evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  26. Simberloff DS, Boecklen W (1981) Santa Rosalia reconsidered: size ratios and competition. Evolution 35:1206–1228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Slobodchikoff CN, Schulz WC (1980) Measures of niche overlap. Ecology 61:1051–1055Google Scholar
  28. Smythe N (1970) Relationships between fruiting seasons and seed dispersal methods in a neotropical forest. Amer Natur 104:25–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Snow DW (1965) A possible selective factor in the evolution of fruiting seasons in tropical forest. Oikos 15:274–281Google Scholar
  30. Stiles FG (1975) Ecology, flowering phenology, and hummingbird pollination of some Costa Rican Heliconia species. Ecology 56:285–301Google Scholar
  31. Stiles FG (1977) Coadapted competitors: the flowering seasons of hummingbird-pollinated plants in a tropical forest. Science 198:1177–1178Google Scholar
  32. Stiles FG (1979) Reply to Poole and Rathcke. Science 203:471Google Scholar
  33. Strong DR Jr., Szyska LA, Simberloff DS (1979) Tests of community-wide character displacement against null hypotheses. Evolution 33:897–913Google Scholar
  34. Thompson JN, Willson MF (1979) Evolution of temperate fruit/bird interactions: phenological strategies. Evolution 33:973–982Google Scholar
  35. Thomson JD (1980) Skewed flowering distributions and pollinator attraction. Ecology 61:572–579Google Scholar
  36. Thomson JD (1982) Pattens of visitation by animal pollinators. Oikos 39:241–250Google Scholar
  37. Thomson JD, Rusterholz KA (1982)Overlap summary indices and the detection of community structure. Ecology 63:274–277Google Scholar
  38. Waser NM (1978) Competition for hummingbird pollination and sequential flowering in two Colorado wildflowers. Ecology 59:934–944Google Scholar
  39. Waser NM, Real LA (1979) Effective mutualism between sequentially flowering plant species. Nature 281:670–672Google Scholar
  40. Zimmerman M (1980) Reproduction in Polemonium: competition for pollinators. Ecology 61:497–501Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Theodore H. Fleming
    • 1
  • Brian L. Partridge
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of MiamiCoral GablesUSA

Personalised recommendations