Advertisement

Biology and Fertility of Soils

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 301–308 | Cite as

Fumigation-extraction and substrate-induced respiration derived microbial biomass C, and respiration rate in limed soil of Scots pine sapling stands

  • Outi Priha
  • Aino Smolander
Original Paper

Abstract

The effect of liming on microbial biomass C and respiration activity was studied in four liming experiments on young pine plantations. One of the experimental sites had been limed and planted 12 years before, two 5 years before, and one a year before soil sampling. The youngest experimental site was also treated with ash fertilizer. Liming raised the pHKCl of the humus layer by 1.5 units or less. Microbial biomass was measured using the fumigation-extraction and substrate-induced respiration methods. Liming did not significantly affect microbial biomass C, except in the experiment which had been limed 11 years ago, where there was a slight biomass increase. Basal respiration, which was measured by the evolution of CO2, increased in the limed soils, except for the youngest experiment, where there was no effect. Ash fertilization raised the soil pHKCl by about 0.5 unit, but did not influence microbial biomass C or basal respiration. Fumigation-extraction and substrate-induced respiration derived microbial biomass C values were correlated positively with each other (r=0.65), but substrate-induced respiration gave approximately 1.3 times higher results. In addition, the effect of storing the soil samples at +6 and -18°C was evaluated. The effects were variable but, generally, the substrate-induced respiration derived microbial biomass C decreased, and the fumigation-extraction derived microbial biomass C and basal respiration decreased or were not affected by storage.

Key words

Basal respiration Fumigation extraction Humus layer Lime Microbial biomass Pinus sylvestris L. Storage Substrate-induced respiration 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson JPE, Domsch KH (1978) A physiological method for the quantitative measurement of microbial biomass in soils. Soil Biol Biochem 10:215–221Google Scholar
  2. Anderson T-H, Domsch KH (1993) The metabolic quotient for CO2 (qCO2) as a specific activity parameter to assess the effects of environmental conditions, such as pH, on the microbial biomass of forest soils. Soil Biol Biochem 25:393–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Badalucco L, Greco S, Dell'Orco S, Nannipieri P (1992) Effect of liming on some chemical, biochemical, and microbiological properties of acid soils under spruce (Picea abies L.). Biol Fertil Soils 14:76–83Google Scholar
  4. Brookes PC, Landman A, Pruden G, Jenkinson DS (1985) Chloroform fumigation and the release of soil nitrogen: A rapid direct extraction method to measure microbial biomass nitrogen in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 17:837–842Google Scholar
  5. Bååth E, Berg B, Lohm U, Lundgren B, Lundkvist H, Rosswall T, Söderström B, Wirén A (1980) Effects of experimental acidification and liming on soil organisms and decomposition in a Scots pine forest. Pedobiologia 20:85–100Google Scholar
  6. Cajander AK (1949) Forest types and their significance. Acta For Fenn 56:21–38Google Scholar
  7. Carter MR (1986) Microbial biomass and mineralizable nitrogen in solonetzic soils: influence of gypsum and lime amendments. Soil Biol Biochem 18:531–537Google Scholar
  8. Derome J (1990/1991) Effects of forest liming on the nutrient status of podzolic soils in Finland. Water Air Soil Pollut 54:337–350Google Scholar
  9. Derome J, Kukkola M, Mälkönen E (1986) Forest liming on mineral soils. Results of Finnish experiments. Nat Swed Env Prot Board 3084, GothenburgGoogle Scholar
  10. Fritze H (1991) Forest soil microbial response to emissions from an iron and steel works. Soil Biol Biochem 23:151–155Google Scholar
  11. Halonen O, Tulkki H, Derome J (1983) Nutrient analysis methods. Metsäntutkimuslaitoksen tiedonantoja 121:1–28Google Scholar
  12. Haynes RJ, Swift RS (1988) Effects of lime and phosphate additions on changes in enzyme activities, microbial biomass and levels of extractable nitrogen, sulphur and phosphorus in an acid soil. Biol Fertil Soils 6:153–158Google Scholar
  13. Illmer P, Schinner F (1991) Effects of lime and nutrient salts on the microbiological activities of forest soils. Biol Fertil Soils 11:261–266Google Scholar
  14. Jenkinson DS, Powlson DS (1976) The effects of biocidal treatments on metabolism in soil. V. A method for measuring soil biomass. Soil Biol Biochem 8:209–213Google Scholar
  15. Kaiser E-A, Mueller T, Joergensen RG, Insam H, Heinemeyer O (1992) Evaluation of methods to estimate the soil microbial biomass and the relationship with soil texture and organic matter. Soil Biol Biochem 24:675–683Google Scholar
  16. Kratz W, Brose A, Weigmann G (1991) The influence of lime application in damaged pine forest ecosystems in Berlin (FRG): Soil chemical and biological aspects. In: Ravera O (ed) Terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems: Perturbation and Recovery. Ellis Horwood Limited, Chichester, UK, pp 464–471Google Scholar
  17. Lohm U, Larsson K, Nömmik H (1984) Acidification and liming of coniferous forest soil: Long-term effects on turnover rates of carbon and nitrogen during an incubation experiment. Soil Biol Biochem 16:343–346Google Scholar
  18. Martikainen PJ, Palojärvi A (1990) Evaluation of the fumigation-extraction method for the determination of microbial C and N in a range of forest soils. Soil Biol Biochem 22:797–802Google Scholar
  19. Odum EP (1985) Trends expected in stressed ecosystems. Bio-Science 35:419–422Google Scholar
  20. Persson T, Lundkvist H, Wirén A, Hyvönen R, Wessén B (1989) Effects of acidification and liming on carbon and nitrogen mineralization and soil organisms in mor humus. Water Air Soil Pollut 45:77–96Google Scholar
  21. Persson T, Wirén A, Andersson S (1990/1991) Effects of liming on carbon and nitrogen mineralization in coniferous forests. Water Air Soil Pollut 54:351–364Google Scholar
  22. Ross DJ (1991) Microbial biomass in a stored soil: A comparison of different estimation procedures. Soil Biol Biochem 23: 1005–1007Google Scholar
  23. Ross DJ, Tate KR, Cairns A, Meyrick KF (1980) Influence of storage on soil microbial biomass estimated by three biochemical procedures. Soil Biol Biochem 12:369–374Google Scholar
  24. Shah Z, Adams WA, Haven CDV (1990) Composition and activity of the microbial population in an acidic upland soil and effects of liming. Soil Biol Biochem 22:257–263Google Scholar
  25. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry. WH Freeman and Company, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  26. Sparling GP, Williams BL (1986) Microbial biomass in organic soils: Estimation of biomass C, and effect of glucose or cellulose amendments on the amounts of N and P released by fumigation. Soil Biol Biochem 18:507–513Google Scholar
  27. Sparling GP, West AW (1988) A direct extraction method to estimate soil microbial C: Calibration in situ using microbial respiration and 14C labelled cells. Soil Biol Biochem 20:337–343Google Scholar
  28. Sparling GP, Feltham CW, Reynolds J, West AW, Singleton P (1990) Estimation of soil microbial C by a fumigation-extraction method: Use on soils of high organic matter content, and a reassessment of the k ec-factor. Soil Biol Biochem 22:301–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tamminen P, Starr MR (1990) A survey of forest soil properties related to soil acidification in southern Finland. In: Kauppi P, Anttila P, Kenttämies K (eds) Acidification in Finland. Springger-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York London Paris Tokyo Hong Kong Barcelona, pp 235–251Google Scholar
  30. Vance ED, Brookes PC, Jenkinson DS (1987a) Microbial biomass measurements in forest soils: Determination of k c values and tests of hypotheses to explain the failure of the chloroform fumigation-incubation method in acid soils. Soil Biol Biochem 19:689–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Vance ED, Brookes PC, Jenkinson DS (1987b) Microbial biomass measurements in forest soils: The use of the chloroform fumigation-incubation method in strongly acid soils. Soil Biol Biochem 19:697–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Vance ED, Brookes PC, Jenkinson DS (1987c) An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biol Biochem 19:703–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wardle DA (1992) A comparative assessment of factors which influence microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen levels in soil. Biol Rev 67:321–358Google Scholar
  34. West AW, Sparling GP (1986) Modifications to the substrate-induced respiration method to permit measurement of microbial biomass in soils of differing water contents. J Microbiol Methods 5:177–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. West AW, Sparling GP, Grant WD (1986) Correlation between four methods to estimate total microbial biomass in stored, air-dried and glucose-amended soils. Soil Biol Biochem 18:569–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Williams BL, Sparling GP (1984) Extractable N and P in relation to microbial biomass in UK acid organic soils. Plant and Soil 76:139–148Google Scholar
  37. Zelles L, Scheunert I, Kreutzer K (1987) Bioactivity in limed soil of a spruce forest. Biol Fertil Soils 3:211–216Google Scholar
  38. Zelles L, Stepper K, Zsolnay A (1990) The effect of lime on microbial activity in spruce (Picea abies L.) forests. Biol Fertil Soils 9:78–82Google Scholar
  39. Zelles L, Adrian P, Bai QY, Stepper K, Adrian MV, Fischer K, Maier A, Ziegler A (1991) Microbial activity measured in soils stored under different temperature and humidity conditions. Soil Biol Biochem 23:955–962CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Outi Priha
    • 1
  • Aino Smolander
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Forest EcologyFinnish Forest Research InstituteVantaaFinland

Personalised recommendations