The Valdez Principles have been formulated to guide and evaluate corporate conduct towards the environment. While at first glance the code appears to impose enormous new responsibilities on firms, a closer analysis indicates that existing regulations and business practices already require businesses to meet many of the environmental goals sought by its proponents. Likely corporate response to the code is examined against this background and with reference to the experience with other voluntary codes of conduct. It would appear that compliance with the code will yield minimal benefits and non-compliance will impose minimum costs for the environmentally-responsible firm.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Bavaria, J.: 1989, ‘Business, Clean Up Your Environmental Act!’, Newsday, September 7, p. 1.
CERES: 1990, The 1990 Ceres guide to the Valdez Principles (The Social Investment Forum, Boston, MA.).
CERES: 1991, Phone conversation with author, March 20, 1991.
‘Cleaning Up: A Survey of Industry and the Environment’ (1990, September 8), The Economist.
Cooper, A.: 1990, U.S. and Canadian Business in South Africa 1990 (Investor Responsibility Research Center, Washington, DC).
‘Costing the earth: A survey of the environment’ (1989, September 2), The Economist.
Dahlin, J. A.: 1989, ‘Oil Shock’, Business & Economic Review, July–September, pp. 3–7.
Feder, B.: 1989, ‘Who Will Subscribe to the Valdez Principles?’, The New York Times, September 10, p. F6.
Feigenbaum, B. and Lowenberg, A. D.: 1988, ‘South African Disinvestment: Causes and Effects’, Contemporary Policy Issues 6(4), pp. 105–117.
Maremont, M.: 1985, ‘Fire on Campus, Tremors in the Boardroom: Pressure Against Apartheid Builds at Colleges, and Congress Considers Sanctions’, Business Week, April 29, pp. 98–99.
Sanyal, R. N. and Neves, J. S.: 1991, ‘Complying with Voluntary Codes of Conduct: Corporate Strategies for the Valdez Principles’, International Journal of Value Based Management 4(2).
Sullivan, L.: 1982, ‘The Sullivan Statement of Principles’, Third Amplification, November 4, pp. 2–4.
Velasquez, M.: 1990, ‘A South African Investment’, in W. M. Hoffman and J. M. Moore, Eds., Business Ethics, 2nd ed., pp. 597–602 (McGraw-Hill, New York).
Viscusi, W.: 1986, ‘The Impact of Occupational Safety and Health Regulation’, Rand Journal of Economics 17 (Winter), pp. 567–580.
Weddon, D. R., Jr.: 1986, ‘The Evolution of Sullivan Principle Compliance’, Business and Society Review, Spring, pp. 56–60.
Joao S. Neves is Associate Professor of Management at Trenton State College where he teaches various courses in Management. A graduate from the University of Pennsylvania, Dr. Neves has numerous publications in academic and trade journals. His interests include corporate social responsibility and he has contributed to many conferences.
Rajib N. Sanyal teaches international management and human resource management at Trenton State College in Trenton, New Jersey. He obtained his Ph. D. from Georgia State University-Atlanta. His writings can be found in International Journal of Value-Based Management, Journal of International Business Studies, and Labor Studies Journal, among others.
About this article
Cite this article
Sanyal, R.N., Neves, J.S. The valdez principles: Implications for corporate social responsibility. J Bus Ethics 10, 883–890 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00383794
- Economic Growth
- Corporate Social Responsibility
- Social Responsibility
- Minimum Cost
- Business Practice