Roux's archives of developmental biology

, Volume 198, Issue 6, pp 322–329 | Cite as

Expression of exogenously introduced bacterial chloramphenicol acetyltransferase genes in Xenopus laevis embryos before the midblastula transition

  • Koichiro Shiokawa
  • K. Yamana
  • Yuchang Fu
  • Yasuo Atsuchi
  • Keiichi Hosokawa
Article
Received:
Accepted:

Summary

Previous papers have reported that DNAs exogenously injected into Xenopus laevis fertilized eggs are expressed only at and after the midblastula transition (MBT). We have injected fertilized eggs of Xenopus laevis with circular plasmids that contained bacterial chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) genes connected to the promoter of viral genes (pSV2CAT and pAd12.E1aCAT) or the Xenopus cardiac actin gene (actin-CAT fusion gene), and examined whether these DNAs are expressed during the stage before the MBT. We found that expression of CAT enzyme can be detected before the MBT when CAT genes connected to viral promoters were injected. The activity was low during the cleavage stage on a per-embryo basis; however, the time course of the accumulation of the CAT enzyme activity roughly paralleled the increase in cell number. Therefore, CAT enzyme activity per cell was constant during cleavage and did not change dramatically before and after the MBT stage. CAT mRNA level, detected by CAT antisense RNA, was roughly proportional to the levels of CAT enzyme. Therefore, we assume that the observed enzyme activity reflects the transcriptional activity of injected CAT genes before and after the MBT. When the actin-CAT fusion gene was injected, however, no enzyme activity was detected until embryos had reached the neurula stage, a stage when endogenous actin genes are first activated. On the basis of these results, we conclude that the concept of an initial transcriptional activation of exogenous genes at amphibian MBT has to be changed. We propose that the expression of polymerase-II-transcribed genes is regulated by the nature of the promoters connected to the genes rather than by changes associated with MBT.

Key words

Xenopus embryos Midblastula transition DNA injection CAT enzyme expression Actin-CAT fusion gene 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Atsuchi Y, Tashiro K, Yamana K, Shiokawa K (1986) Level of histone H4 mRNA in Xenopus laevis embryonic cells cultured in the absence of cell adhesion. J Embryol Exp Morphol 98:175–185PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bakken A, Morgan G, Sollner-Webb B, Roan J, Busby S, Reeder RH (1982) Mapping of transcription initiation and termination signals on Xenopus laevis ribosomal DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 79:56–60Google Scholar
  3. Boterenbrood EC, Narraway JM (1986) The direction of cleavage waves and the regional variation in the duration of cleavage cycles on the dorsal side of the Xenopus laevis blastula. Wilhelm Roux's Arch 195:487–488Google Scholar
  4. Boterenbrood EC, Narraway JM, Hara K (1983) Duration of cleavage cycles and asymmetry in the direction of cleavage waves prior to gastrulation in Xenopus laevis. Roux's Arch Dev Biol 192:216–221Google Scholar
  5. Chulitskaia EV (1970) Desynchronization of cell divisions in the course of egg cleavage and an attempt at experimental shift of its onset. J Embryol Exp Morphol 23:359–374Google Scholar
  6. Colman A (1975) Transcription of DNAs of known sequence after injection into the eggs and oocytes of Xenopus laevis. Eur J Biochem 57:85–96Google Scholar
  7. Edgar BA, Schubiger G (1986) Parameters controlling transcriptional activation during early Drosophila development. Cell 44:871–877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Etkin LD, Balcells S (1985) Transformed Xenopus embryos as a transient expression system to analyze gene expression at the midblastula transition. Dev Biol 108:173–178Google Scholar
  9. Etkin LD, Pearman B (1987) Distribution, expression and germ line transmission of exogenous DNA sequences following microinjection into Xenopus laevis eggs. Development 99:15–23Google Scholar
  10. Etkin LD, Pearman B, Roberts M, Bektesh SL (1984) Replication, integration and expression of exogenous DNA injected into fertilized eggs of Xenopus laevis. Differentiation 26:194–202Google Scholar
  11. Forbes DJ, Kornberg TB, Kirschner MW (1983) Small nuclear RNA transcription and ribonucleoprotein assembly in early Xenopus development. J Cell Biol 97:62–72Google Scholar
  12. Fu Y, Hosokawa K, Shiokawa K (1989a) Expression of circular and linearized bacterial chloramphenicol acetyltransferase genes with or without viral promoters after injection into fertilized eggs, unfertilized eggs and oocytes of Xenopus laevis. Roux's Arch Dev Biol 198:148–156Google Scholar
  13. Fu Y, Sato K, Hosokawa K, Shiokawa K (1990b) Expression of circular plasmids which contain bacterial chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene connected to the promoter of polypeptide IX gene of human adenovirus type 12 in oocytes, eggs and embryos of Xenopus laevis. Zool Sci (in press)Google Scholar
  14. Gorman CM, Moffat LF, Howard BH (1982) Recombinant genomes which express chloramphenicol acetyltransferase in mammalian cells. Mol Cell Biol 2:1044–1051Google Scholar
  15. Griffith JK, Griffith BB, Humphreys T (1981) Regulation of ribosomal RNA synthesis in sea urchin embryos and oocytes. Dev Biol 87:220–228Google Scholar
  16. Hara K (1977) The cleavage pattern of the Axolotl egg studied by cinematography and cell counting. Roux's Arch Dev Biol 181:73–87Google Scholar
  17. Kimelman D, Kirschner M, Scherson T (1987) The events of the midblastula transition in Xenopus are regulated by changes in the cell cycle. Cell 48:399–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Krieg PA, Melton DA (1985) Developmental regulation of a gastrula-specific gene injected into fertilized Xenopus eggs. EMBO J 4:3463–3471PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kruczek I, Doerfler W (1983) Expression of the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene in mammalian cells under the control of adenovirus type 12 promoters: effect of promoter methylation on gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 80:7586–7590Google Scholar
  20. Marini NJ, Etkin LD, Benbow RM (1988) Persistence and replication of plasmid DNA microinjected into early embryos of Xenopus laevis. Dev Biol 127:421–434Google Scholar
  21. Melton DA, Krieg PA, Rebagliati MR, Maniatis T, Zinn K, Green MR (1984) Efficient in vitro synthesis of biologically active RNA and RNA hybridization probes from plasmids containing a bacteriophage SP6 promoter. Nucl Acids Res 12:7035–7056Google Scholar
  22. Mohun TJ, Garrett N, Gurdon JB (1986) Upstream sequences required for tissue-specific activation of the cardiac actin gene in Xenopus laevis embryos. EMBO J 5:3185–3193Google Scholar
  23. Nakakura N, Miura T, Yamana K, Ito A, Shiokawa K (1987) Synthesis of heterogeneous mRNA-like RNA and low-molecular-weight RNA before the midblastula transition in embryos of Xenopus laevis. Dev Biol 123:421–429Google Scholar
  24. Newport J, Kirschner M (1982a) A major developmental transition in early Xenopus embryos. I. Characterization and timing of cellular changes at the midblastula stage. Cell 30:675–686Google Scholar
  25. Newport J, Kirschner M (1982b) A major developmental transition in early Xenopus embryos. II. Control of the onset of transcription. Cell 30:687–696Google Scholar
  26. Nieuwkoop PD, Faber J (1956) Normal Table of Xenopus laevis Daudin. North-Holland Publ Co, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  27. Satoh N (1977) Metachronous cleavage and initiation of gastrulation in amphibian embryo. Dev Growth Differ 19:111–118Google Scholar
  28. Shiokawa K, Yamana K (1967) Pattern of RNA synthesis in isolated cells of Xenopus laevis embryos. Dev Biol 16:368–388Google Scholar
  29. Shiokawa K, Yamana K (1979) Differential initiation of rRNA gene activity in progenies of different blastomeres of early Xenopus embryos: evidence for regulated synthesis of rRNA. Dev Growth Differ 21:501–507Google Scholar
  30. Shiokawa K, Misumi Y, Yamana K (1981a) Demonstration of rRNA synthesis in pre-gastrular embryos of Xenopus laevis. Dev Growth Differ 23:579–587Google Scholar
  31. Shiokawa K, Tashiro K, Misumi Y, Yamana K (1981b) Non-coordinated synthesis of RNAs in pregastrular embryos of Xenopus laevis. Dev Growth Differ 23:589–597Google Scholar
  32. Shiokawa K, Sameshima M, Tashiro K, Miura T, Nakakura N, Yamana K (1986) Formation of nucleus-like structure in the cytoplasm of λ-DNA-injected fertilized eggs and its partition into blastomeres during early embryogenesis in Xenopus laevis. Dev Biol 116:539–542Google Scholar
  33. Shiokawa K, Tashiro K, Yamana K, Sameshima M (1987) Electron microscopic studies of giant nucleus-like structure formed by lambda DNA introduced into the cytoplasm of Xenopus laevis fertilized eggs and embryos. Cell Differ 20:253–261Google Scholar
  34. Shiokawa K, Fu Y, Nakakura N, Tashiro K, Sameshima M, Hosokawa K (1989a) Effects of the injection of exogenous DNAs on gene expression in early embryos and coenocytic egg cells of Xenopus laevis Roux's Arch Dev Biol 198:78–84Google Scholar
  35. Shiokawa K, Misumi Y, Tashiro K, Nakakura N, Yamana K, Oh-uchida M (1990b) Changes in the patterns of RNA synthesis in early embryogenesis of Xenopus laevis. Cell Differ Dev 28:17–26Google Scholar
  36. Shiokawa K, Yamazaki T, Fu Y, Tashiro K, Tsurugi K, Motizuki M, Ikegami Y, Araki E, Andoh T, Hosokawa K (1989c) Persistence and expression of circular DNAs encoding Drosophila amylase, bacterial chloramphenicol acetyltransferase, and others in Xenopus laevis embryos. Cell Struct Funct 14:261–269Google Scholar
  37. Signoret J (1977) La cinetique cellulaire au cours de la segmentation du germe d'Axolotl: proposition d'un modele statistique. J Embryol Exp Morphol 42:5–14Google Scholar
  38. Signoret J, Lefresne J (1971) Contribution a l'etude de la segmentation de l'oeuf d'axolotl: I definition de la transition blastuleenne. Ann Embryol Morphol 4:113–123Google Scholar
  39. Signoret J, David J-C (1986) Control of expression of genes for DNA ligase in eukaryotes. Int Rev Cytol 103:249–279Google Scholar
  40. Slater DW, Spiegelman S (1970) Transcriptive expression during sea urchin embryogenesis. Biochim Biophys Acta 213:194–207Google Scholar
  41. Tashiro K, Misumi Y, Shiokawa K, Yamana K (1983) Determination of the rate of rRNA synthesis in Xenopus laevis triploid embryos produced by low-temperature treatment. J Exp Zool 225:489–495Google Scholar
  42. Tashiro K, Inoue M, Sakaki Y, Shiokawa K (1986a) Preservation of Xenopus laevis rDNA-containing plasmid, pX1r101A, injected into the fertilized egg of Xenopus laevis. Cell Struct Funct 11:109–114Google Scholar
  43. Tashiro K, Shiokawa K, Yamana K, Sakaki Y (1986b) Structural analysis of ribosomal DNA homologues in nucleolus-less mutant of Xenopus laevis. Gene 44:299–306Google Scholar
  44. Wasylyk B (1988) Enhancers and transcription factors in the control of gene expression. Biochim Biophys Acta 951:17–35Google Scholar
  45. Wilson C, Cross GS, Woodland HR (1986) Tissue-specific expression of actin genes injected into Xenopus embryos. Cell 47:589- 599Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Koichiro Shiokawa
    • 1
  • K. Yamana
    • 1
  • Yuchang Fu
    • 1
  • Yasuo Atsuchi
    • 1
  • Keiichi Hosokawa
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Biology, Faculty of Science 33Kyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan
  2. 2.Department of BiochemistryKawasaki Medical CollegeKurashikiJapan

Personalised recommendations