Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Common law union as a differentiating factor in the failure of marriage in Canada, 1984

Abstract

Using the 1984 Canadian Family History Survey, the authors attempt to ascertain the effect of common-law unions on the subsequent failure of marriage, operationalized as those ending in divorce or separation. Techniques employed include crosstabulations and hazards-model analysis. It is concluded that marriages preceded by a common-law union have a greater chance of dissolution. The paper and the results of the analysis clarify some of the contradictions presented in previous research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Adams, B. N.: 1986, The Family: A Sociological Interpretation. (fourth edition) (Harcourt Bruce Jovanovich Inc., New-York).

  2. Arafat, I. and Yorburg, B.: 1973, ‘On living together without marriage’, Journal of Sex Research 9, 97–106.

  3. Balakrishnan, T. R., Rao, K. V., Lapierre-Adamcyk, E., and Krotki, K. J.: 1987, ‘A hazards-model analysis of the covariates of marriage dissolution in Canada’, Demography 24(3), 395–406.

  4. Balakrishnan, T. R.: 1986, ‘Changing nuptiality patterns and its fertility implications in Canada’, (paper presented at the ‘Family in Crisis’ conference, University of Ottawa) November.

  5. Becker, G., Landes, E. M., and Micheal, R.: 1977, ‘An economic analysis of marital instability’, Journal of Political Economy 85, 1141–87.

  6. Bennett, N. G., Blanc, A. K., and Bloom, D. E.: 1988, ‘Commitment and modern union: assessing the link between premarital cohabitation and subsequent marital stability’, American Sociological Review 53, 127–38.

  7. Brown, A. and Kierman, K.: 1981, ‘Cohabitation in Great Britain: evidence from the general household survey’, Population Trends 25, 4–10.

  8. Burch, T. K. and Madan, A. K.: 1986, Union Formation and Dissolution: Results from the 1984 Family History Survey. Housing, Family and Social Statistical Division, Catalogue 99-936 (Ottawa, Statistics Canada).

  9. Cox, D. R.: 1972, ‘Regression models and life tables (with discussion)’, Journal of Royal Statistical Society Series B34, 184–220.

  10. Family History Survey: 1985, Public Use Micro-data Documentation. Housing, Family and Social Division, Statistics Canada.

  11. Glick, P. C. and Spanier, G. B.: 1980, ‘Married and unmarried cohabitation in the United States’, Journal of Marriage and the Family 42, 19–30.

  12. Gwartney-Gibbs, P. A.: 1983, ‘The institutionalization of premarital cohabitation: estimates from marriage license applications, 1970 and 1980’, Journal of Marriage and the Family 48, 423–34.

  13. Hanna, S. L. and Knaub, P. K.: 1981, ‘Cohabitation before remarriage: Its relationship to family strength’, Alternative Lifestyles 4, 507–22.

  14. Jacques, J. M. and Chason, K. J.: 1979, ‘Cohabitation: Its impact on marital success’, Family Coordinator 28, 35–39.

  15. Lyness, J. F.: 1978, ‘Happily ever after? Followup of living-together couples’, Alternative Lifestyles 1, 55–70.

  16. Macklin, E. D.: 1978, ‘Non-marital heterosexual cohabitation: a review of research’ Marriage and Family Review 1, 1–12.

  17. Macklin, E. D.: 1983, ‘Non-marital heterosexual cohabitation: an overview’, in Macklin, E. D., Rubin, R. H., (eds.), Contemporary Families and Alternative Lifestyles, Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

  18. Menken, J., Trussell, J., Stempel, D., and Babakol, O.: 1981, ‘Proportional hazards life tables models: an illustrative analysis of marriage dissolution in the United States’, Demography 18(2), 181–200.

  19. Newcomb, M. D. and Bentler, P. M.: 1980, ‘Cohabitation before marriage: a comparison of married couples who did and did not cohabit’, Alternative Lifestyles 3, 65–85.

  20. Ramu, G. N.: 1983, ‘Courtship and marriage’, In Ishwaran, K. (ed.), The Canadian Family (Gage Publications Ltd. Toronto).

  21. Rank, M. R.: 1981, ‘The transition to marriage: a comparison of cohabiting and dating relationships ending in marriage or divorce’, Alternative Lifestyles 4, 487–506.

  22. Rao K. and Balakrishnan T. R.: 1986, ‘Childlessness as a factor of fertility decline in Canada’, Research report for the Committee on the Review of Demography and its Implications for Economic and Social Policy, Health and Welfare Canade.

  23. Risman, B. J., Hill, C. T., Rubin, Z., and Peplau, L. A.: 1981, ‘Living together in college: implications for courtship’, Journal of Marriage and the Family 43, 77–83.

  24. Shin Y. E.: 1987, ‘Common law marriage in Canada: An alternative or a trial marriage’, (paper presented at the ‘Canadian Population Society Annual Meetings’) June.

  25. Stafford, R., Backman, E. and Dibana, P.: 1977, ‘The division of labour among cohabitors and married couples’, Journal of Marriage and the Family 39, 43–57.

  26. Teachman, J.: 1982, ‘Methodological issues in the analysis of family formation and dissolution’, Journal of Marriage and the Family 44, 1037–53.

  27. Trussell J. and Rao K. V.: 1988, ‘Premarital cohabitation and marital stability: A reassessment of the Canadian Evidence’, Unpublished Manuscript, 1988.

  28. Watson, R. E. L.: 1983, ‘Premarital cohabitation versus traditional courtship: their effects on subsequent marital adjustment’, Family Relations 32, 139–47.

  29. White, J. M.: 1987, ‘Premarital Cohabitation and Marital Stability in Canada’, Journal of Marriage and the Family 49, 641–47.

Download references

Author information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Halli, S.S., Zimmer, Z. Common law union as a differentiating factor in the failure of marriage in Canada, 1984. Soc Indic Res 24, 329–345 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00383733

Download citation

Keywords

  • Family History
  • Great Chance
  • History Survey
  • Subsequent Failure
  • Differentiate Factor