Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 10, Issue 11, pp 805–817 | Cite as

The social desirability response bias in ethics research

  • Donna M. Randall
  • Maria F. Fernandes
Article

Abstract

This study examines the impact of a social desirability response bias as a personality characteristic (self-deception and impression management) and as an item characteristic (perceived desirability of the behavior) on self-reported ethical conduct. Findings from a sample of college students revealed that self-reported ethical conduct is associated with both personality and item characteristics, with perceived desirability of behavior having the greatest influence on self-reported conduct. Implications for research in business ethics are drawn, and suggestions are offered for reducing the effects of a socially desirable response bias.

Keywords

Economic Growth College Student Ethic Research Business Ethic Great Influence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arnold, J. H. and Feldman, D. C.: 1981, ‘Social Desirability Response Bias in Self-Report Choice Situations’, Academy of Management Journal 24, pp. 377–385.Google Scholar
  2. Aupperle, K. E.: 1984, ‘An Empirical Measure of Corporate Social Orientation’, Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, pp. 627–654.Google Scholar
  3. Bernreuter, R. G.: 1933, ‘Validity of the Personality Inventory’, Personality Journal 11, pp. 383–386.Google Scholar
  4. Bishop, G. F., Tuchfarber, A. J., Oldendick, R. W.: 1986, ‘Opinions on Fictitious Issues: The Pressure to Answer Survey Questions’, Public Opinion Quarterly 50, pp. 240–250.Google Scholar
  5. Bradburn, N. M., Sudman, S. and Associates: 1979, Improving Interview Method and Questionnaire Design: Response Effects to Threatening Questions in Survey Research (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).Google Scholar
  6. Bradley, J. V.: 1981, ‘Overconfidence in Ignorant Experts’, Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 17, No. 2, pp. 82–84.Google Scholar
  7. Brookhouse, K., Guion, R. M. and Doherty, M.: 1986, ‘Social Desirability Response Bias as One Source of the Disrepancy Between Subjective Weights and Regression Weights’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 37, pp. 316–328.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, D. J. and King, K. B.: 1982, ‘Small Business Ethics: Influences and Perceptions’, Journal of Small Business Management 20, pp. 11–18.Google Scholar
  9. Cicourel, A. V.: 1964, Method and Measurement in Sociology (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  10. Cowen, E. and Tongas, P.: 1959, ‘The Social Desirability of Trait Descriptive Terms’, Journal of Consulting Psychology 3, pp. 361–365.Google Scholar
  11. Crandall, V.: 1966, ‘Personality Characteristics and Social Achievement Behaviors Associated with Children's Social Desirability Response Tendencies’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 4, pp. 447–486.Google Scholar
  12. Crowne, D. P.: 1979, The Experimental Study of Personality, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  13. Crowne, D. P. and Marlowe, D.: 1960, ‘A New Scale of Social Desirability Independent of Psychopathology’, Journal of Consulting Psychology 24, pp. 349–354.Google Scholar
  14. Crowne, D. P. and Marlowe, D.: 1964, The Approval Motive (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
  15. Demaio, T. J.: 1984, ‘Social Desirability and Survey Measurement: A Review’, pp. 257–282 in C. F. Turner and E. Martin (Eds.), Surveying Subjective Phenomena (Vol. 2) (Russell Sage Foundation, New York).Google Scholar
  16. Dohrenwend, B. P.: 1966, ‘Social Status and Psychiatric Disorder: An Issue of Substance and an Issue of Method’, American Sociological Review 23, pp. 361–365.Google Scholar
  17. Edwards, A.: 1953, ‘The Relationship Between the Judged Desirability of a Trait and the Probability that the Trait Will be Endorsed’, Journal of Applied Psychology 37, pp. 90–93.Google Scholar
  18. Ferrell, O. C. and Weaver, K. M.: 1978, ‘Ethical Beliefs of Marketing Managers’, Journal of Marketing 42, No. 3, pp. 69–73.Google Scholar
  19. Fisher, G.: 1967, ‘Normative and Reliability Data for the Standard and the Cross-Validated Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale’, Psychological Reports 20, p. 174.Google Scholar
  20. Friedman, N.: 1967, The Social Nature of Psychological Research (Basic, New York).Google Scholar
  21. Ganster, D. C., Hennessy, H. W., and Luthans, F.: 1983, ‘Social Desirability Response Effects: Three Alternative Models’, Academy of Management Journal 26, No. 2, pp. 321–331.Google Scholar
  22. Goodman, C. S. and Crawford, M.: 1974, ‘Young Executives: A Source of New Ethics?’, Personnel Journal 53, pp. 180–187.Google Scholar
  23. Gove, W. R. and Greeken, M. P.: 1977, ‘Response Bias in Surveys of Mental Health: An Empirical Examination’, American Journal of Sociology 82, pp. 1289–1317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Grover, S. L.: 1990, ‘The Influence of Professional Role Conflict and Moral Maturity on Professionals' Reporting Accuracy’, Paper Presented at the 1990 Academy of Management Meetings, San Francisco, CA, August 12–15.Google Scholar
  25. Groves, R. M.: 1989, Survey Errors and Survey Costs (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
  26. Humm, D. G. and Humm, K. A.: 1944, ‘Validity of the Humm-Wadsworth Temperament Scale: With Consideration of the Effects of Subjects' Response-Bias’, Journal of Psychology 18, pp. 55–64.Google Scholar
  27. Izraeli, D.: 1988, ‘Ethical Beliefs and Behavior Among Managers: A Cross-Cultural Perspective’, Journal of Business Ethics 7, pp. 263–271.Google Scholar
  28. Jacobson, L. I., Berger, S. E., and Millham, J.: 1970, ‘Individual Differences in Cheating During a Temptation Period when Confronting Failure’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 15, pp. 48–56.Google Scholar
  29. Kidwell, J. M., Stevens, R. E. and Bethke, A. L.: 1987, ‘Differences in Ethical Perceptions Between Male and Female Managers: Myth or Reality?’, Journal of Business Ethics 6, pp. 489–493.Google Scholar
  30. Krugman, D. M. and Ferrell, O. C.: 1981, ‘The Organizational Ethics of Advertising’, Journal of Advertising 10, No. 1, pp. 21–30.Google Scholar
  31. Lautenschlager, G. J. and Flaherty, V. L.: 1990, ‘Computer Administration of Questions: More Desirable or More Social Desirability?’, Journal of Applied Psychology 75, No. 3, pp. 310–314.Google Scholar
  32. Martin, C. L. and Nagao, D. H.: 1989, ‘Some Effects of Computerized Interviewing on Job Applicant Responses’, Journal of Applied Psychology 74, No. 1, pp. 72–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mazen, A. M.: 1990, ‘The Moderating Role of Social Desirability, Age, and Experience in Human Judgment: Just how Indirect is Policy Capturing?’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 45, pp. 19–40.Google Scholar
  34. Millham, J.: 1974, ‘Two Components of Need of Approval Score and their Relationship to Cheating Following Success and Failure’, Journal of Research in Personality 8, pp. 378–392.Google Scholar
  35. Nederhof, A. J.: 1985, ‘Methods of Coping with Social Desirability Bias: A Review’, European Journal of Social Psychology 15, pp. 263–280.Google Scholar
  36. Newstrom, J. W. and Ruch, W. A.: 1975, ‘The Ethics of Management and the Management of Ethics’, MSU Business Topics, Winter: 29–37.Google Scholar
  37. Newstrom, J. W. and Ruch, W. A.: 1976, ‘Managerial Values Underlying Intra-Organizational Ethics’, Atlanta Economic Review, May–June, pp. 12–15.Google Scholar
  38. Nunnally, J. C.: 1978, Psychometric Theory, 2nd Ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
  39. Paulhus, D. L.: 1984, ‘Two-Component Models of Socially Desirable Responding’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46, pp. 598–609.Google Scholar
  40. Paulhus, D. L.: 1986, ‘Self-Deception and Impression Management in Test Responses’, in A. Angleitner and J. S. Wiggins (Eds.), Personality Assessment Via Questionnaire: Current Issues in Theory and Measurement (Springer-Verlag, Berlin).Google Scholar
  41. Paulhus, D. L.: 1988, ‘Development of the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding’, Unpublished manuscript, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
  42. Paulhus, D. L.: 1989 ‘Measurement and Control of Response Bias’, in J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, and L. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of Social-Psychological Attitudes (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
  43. Phillips, D. L. and Clancy, K. J.: 1972, “Some Effects of ‘Social Desirability’ in Survey Studies”, American Journal of Sociology 77, No. 5, 921–940.Google Scholar
  44. Randall, D. M. and Gibson, A. M.: 1990, ‘Methodology in Business Ethics Research: A Review and Critical Assessment’, Journal of Business Ethics 9, No. 6, 457–472.Google Scholar
  45. Riecken, H. W.: 1962, ‘A Program for Research on Experiments in Social Psychology’, in N. F. Washburn (Ed.), Values and Groups, New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  46. Rosen, E.: 1956, ‘Self-Appraisal, Personal Desirability, and Perceived Social Desirability of Personality Traits’, Journal of Social Psychology 52, pp 151–158.Google Scholar
  47. Rosenthal, R 1966, Experimental Effects in Behavioral Research (Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York).Google Scholar
  48. Ruch, W. A. and Newstrom, J. W.: 1975, ‘How Unethical are We?’, Supervisory Management, pp. 16–21.Google Scholar
  49. Sackeim, H. A. and Gur, R.: 1978, ‘Self-Deception, Self-Confrontation and Consciousness’, in G. E. Schwartz and D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and Self-Regulation: Advances in Research (Vol. 2, pp. 139–197), Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
  50. Stem, D. E., Jr. and Steinhorst, R. K.: 1984, ‘Telephone Interview and Mail Questionnaire Applications of the Randomized Response Model’, Journal of the American Statistical Association 79, No. 387, pp. 555–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Stevens, G. E.: 1984, ‘Business Ethics and Social Responsibility: The Responses of Present and Future Managers’, Akron Business and Economic Review 15, No. 3, pp. 6–11.Google Scholar
  52. Tanaka-Matsumi, J. and Kameoka, V. A.: 1986, ‘Reliabilities and Concurrent Validities of Popular Self-Report Measures of Depression, Anxiety, and Social Desirability’, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 54, pp. 328–333.Google Scholar
  53. Trevino, L. K.: 1986, ‘Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person-Situation Interactionist Model’, Academy of Management Review 11, No. 3, pp. 601–611.Google Scholar
  54. Victor, B. and Cullen, J. B.: 1988, ‘The Organizational Bases of Ethical Work Climates’, Administrative Science Quarterly 33, pp. 101–125.Google Scholar
  55. Wiggins, J. and Rumrill, C.: 1959, ‘Social Desirability in the MMPI and Welsh's Factor Scales A and R’, Journal of Consulting Psychology 23, pp. 100–106.Google Scholar
  56. Wiseman, F.: 1972, ‘Methodological Bias in Public Opinion Surveys’, Public Opinion Quarterly 36 pp. 105–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zerbe, W. J. and Paulhus, D. L.: 1987, ‘Socially Desirable Responding in Organizational Behavior: A Reconception’, Academy of Management Journal 12, No. 2, pp. 250–264.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Donna M. Randall
    • 1
  • Maria F. Fernandes
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Management and SystemsWashington State UniversityPullmanU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations