Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 321–357 | Cite as

The association between corporate social-responsibility and financial performance: The paradox of social cost

  • Moses L. Pava
  • Joshua Krausz


It is generally assumed that common stock investors are exclusively interested in earning the highest level of future cash-flow for a given amount of risk. This view suggests that investors select a well-diversified portfolio of securities to achieve this goal. Accordingly, it is often assumed that investors are unwilling to pay a premium for corporate behavior which can be described as “socially-responsible”.

Recently, this view has been under increasing attack. According to the Social Investment Forum, at least 538 institutional investors now allocate funds using social screens or criteria. In addition, Alice Tepper Marlin, president of the New York-based Council on Economic Priorities has recently estimated that about $600 billion of invested funds are socially-screened (1992).


Economic Growth Financial Performance Social Cost Institutional Investor Common Stock 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alexander, G. J. and R. A. Buchholz: 1978, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Stock Market Performance’, Academy of Management Journal 21, 479–486.Google Scholar
  2. Altman, E.: 1968, ‘Financial Ratios, Discriminant Analysis, and the Prediction of Corporate Bankruptcy’, Journal of Finance (Sept.), 589–609.Google Scholar
  3. The American Heritage Dictionary: Second College Edition: 1985 (Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston).Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, J. C. and A. W. Frankle: 1980, ‘Voluntary Social Reporting: An Iso-beta Portfolio Analysis’, The Accounting Review 55(3), 467–479.Google Scholar
  5. Arlow, P. and M. Gannon: 1982. ‘Social Responsiveness, Corporate Structure, and Economic Performance’, Academy of Management Review 7, 235–241.Google Scholar
  6. Aupperle, K. E., A. B. Carroll and J. D. Hatfield: ‘An Empirical Examination of the Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Profitability’, Academy of Management Journal 28(2), 446–463.Google Scholar
  7. Baldwin, S. A., J. W. Tower, L. Litvak, J. F. Karpen, with H. F. Jackson and B. McTigue: 1986, Pension Funds and Ethical Investment (Council on Economic Priorities, New York).Google Scholar
  8. Belkaoui, A.: 1976, ‘The Impact of the Disclosure of the Environmental Effects of Organizational Behavior on the Market’, Financial Management 5(4), 26–31.Google Scholar
  9. Bowles, S. and H. Gintis: 1987, Democracy & Capitalism: Property, Community annd the Contraditions of Modern Social Thought (Basic Books).Google Scholar
  10. Bowman, E. H. and M. A. Haire: 1975, ‘A Strategic Posture Toward Corporate Social Responsibility’, California Management Review 18(2), 49–58.Google Scholar
  11. Boycott Report: Developments and Trends Affecting the Arab Boycott and Arab Influence in the USA (New York: American Jewish Congress, Vol. 16, No. 8, October 1992).Google Scholar
  12. Bragdon, J. H. and J. A. T. Marlin: 1972, ‘Is Pollution Profitable?’, Risk Management 19(4), 9–18.Google Scholar
  13. Bruyn, Severyn T.: 1987, The Field of Social Investment (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).Google Scholar
  14. Chen, K. H. and R. W. Metcalf: 1984, ‘The Relationship Between Pollution Control Record and Financial Indicators Revisited’, The Accounting Review 55(1), 168–177.Google Scholar
  15. Chugh, L., M. Haneman and S. Mahapatra: 1978, ‘Impact of Pollution Control Regulations on the Market Risk of Securities in the U. S.’, Journal of Economic Studies 5(1), 64–70.Google Scholar
  16. Cochran, P. L. and R. A. Wood: 1984, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance’, Academy of Management Journal 27(1), 42–56.Google Scholar
  17. Coffey, B. S. and G. Fryxell: 1991, ‘Institutional Ownership of Stock and Dimensions of Corporate Social Performance: An Empirical Examination’, Journal of Business Ethics 10, 437–444.Google Scholar
  18. Cornell, B. and A. C. Shapiro: 1987, ‘Corporate Stakeholders and Corporate Finance’, Financial Management 16, 5–14.Google Scholar
  19. Cotrill, M. T.: 1990, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and the Marketplace’, Journal of Business Ethics 9, 723–729.Google Scholar
  20. Council on Economic Priorities and M. Alperson, A. Tepper Marlin, J. Schorsch and R. Will: 1991, The Better World Investment Guide (Prentice Hall Press, New York).Google Scholar
  21. Drucker, P. F.: 1992, ‘The New Society of Organizations’, Harvard Business Review, Sept.–Oct. 95–104.Google Scholar
  22. Drucker, P. F.: 1989, The New Realities: In Government and Politics/In Economics and Business/In Society and World View (Harper and Row, Publishers, New York).Google Scholar
  23. Epstein, M. J. and M. L. Pava: 1992, ‘Corporations and the Environment: Shareholders Demand Accountability’, USA Today Magazine 121(2570), 32–33.Google Scholar
  24. Fogler, H. R. and R. Nutt: 1975, ‘A Note on Social Responsibility and Stock Valuation’, Academy of Management Journal 18(1), 155–160.Google Scholar
  25. Freedman, M. and B. Jaggi: 1986, ‘An Analysis of the Impact of Corporate Pollution disclosures Included in Annual Financial Statements on Investors' Decisions’, Advances in Public Interst Accounting 1, 193–212.Google Scholar
  26. Freedman, M. and B. Jaggi: 1982, ‘Pollution Disclosures, Pollution Performance and Economic Performance’, The International Journal of Management Science 10(2), 167–176.Google Scholar
  27. Friedman, B. M. (ed.): 1978, New Challenges to the Role of Profit (Lexinton Books, Lexington, MA).Google Scholar
  28. Friedman, M.: 1970, ‘A Friedman Doctrine — The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits’, The New York Times Magazine, Sept. 13, 32–33, and 123–125.Google Scholar
  29. Friedman, M.: 1962, Capitalism and Freedom (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  30. Friedman, M. and R. Friedman: 1980, Free to Choose (Avon Books, New York).Google Scholar
  31. Gilder, G.: 1984, The Spirit of Enterprise (Simon and Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
  32. Kahneman, D., J. L. Knetsch and R. H. Thaler: 1986, ‘Fairness and Assumptions of Economics’, Journal of Business 59(4), 285–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kedia, B. L. and E. C. Kuntz: 1981, ‘The Context of Social Performance: An Empirical Study of Texas Banks’, in L. E. Preston (ed), Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy (Vol. 3) (Greenwich, JAI Press, CT), pp. 133–154.Google Scholar
  34. Kristol, I: 1978, Two Cheers For Capitalism (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
  35. Lorsch, J.: 1989, Pawns or Potentates: The Reality of America's Corporate Boards (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  36. Marlin, A. T.: 1992, ‘Shopping for a Better World’, Business and Society Review 20(81), 32–33.Google Scholar
  37. McGuire, J., A. Sundgren and T. Schneeweis: 1988, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance’, Academy of Management Journal. 31(4), 854–872.Google Scholar
  38. Moskowitz, M. R.: 1972, ‘Choosing Socially Responsible Stocks’, Business and Society Review 1, 71–75.Google Scholar
  39. Mulligan, T.: 1986, ‘A Critique of Milton Friedman's Essay ‘The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits’’, Journal of Business Ethics 5, 265–269.Google Scholar
  40. New York Times (February 11, 1993).Google Scholar
  41. Newton, L.: 1989, Ethics in America: A Source Reader (Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall, NJ).Google Scholar
  42. Novak, M.: 1984, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism (American Enterprise Institute and Simon and Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
  43. Nozick, R.: 1981, Philosophical Explanations (The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  44. Okun, A.: 1975, Equality and Efficiency: The Big Tradeoff (The Brookings Institution, Washington DC).Google Scholar
  45. Patten, D. M.: 1990, ‘The Market Reaction to Social Responsibility Disclosures: The Case of the Sullivan Principles Signings’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 15(6), 575–587.Google Scholar
  46. Parket, I. R. and H. Eilbirt,: 1975, ‘Social Responsibility: The Underlying Factors’, Business Horizons 18(4), 5–10.Google Scholar
  47. Roberts, R. W.: 1992, ‘Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: An Application of Stakeholder Theory’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 17(6), 595–612.Google Scholar
  48. Rockness, J., P. Schlachter and H. Rockness: 1986, ‘Hazardous Waste Disposal, Corporate Disclosure, and Financial Performance in the Chemical Industry’, Advances in Public Interest Accounting 1, 167–191.Google Scholar
  49. Rockness, J. and P. F. Williams: 1988, ‘A Descriptive Study of Social Responsibility Mutual Funds’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 13(4), 397–411.Google Scholar
  50. Sanyal, R. N. and J. S. Neves: 1991, ‘The Valdez Principles: Implications for Corporate Social Responsibility’, Journal of Business Ethics 10, 883–890.Google Scholar
  51. Shane, P. and B. Spicer: 1983, ‘Market Response to Environmental Information Produced Outside the Firm’, The Accounting Review 58(3), 521–538.Google Scholar
  52. Social Investment Forum: 1991, Socially Responsible Mutual Funds (August, Minneapolis, MN).Google Scholar
  53. Spicer, B. H.: 1978, ‘Investors, Corporate Social Performance and Information Disclosure: An Emprical Study’, Accounting Review 55, 94–111.Google Scholar
  54. Spicer, B. H.: 1978, ‘Market Risk, Accounting Data and Companies' Pollution Control Records’, Journal of Business, Finance and Accounting 5, 67–83.Google Scholar
  55. Spicer, B. H.: 1980, ‘The Relationship Between Pollution Control Record and Financial Indicators Revisited: Futher Comment’, The Accounting Review 55(1), 178–185.Google Scholar
  56. Stickney, C. P.: 1990, Financial Statement Analysis: A Strategic Perspective (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc., Orlando, FL).Google Scholar
  57. Sturdivant, F. D. and J. L. Ginter: 1977, ‘Corporate Social Responsiveness’, California Management Review 19(3), 30–39.Google Scholar
  58. Trotman, K. and G. Bradley: 1981, ‘Association Between Social Responsibility Disclosure and Characteristics of Companies’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 355–362.Google Scholar
  59. Ullmann, A. A.: 1985, ‘Data in Search of a Theory: A Critical Examination of the Relationships Among Social Performance, Social Disclosure, and Economic Performance of U. S. Firms’, Academy of Management Review 10(3), 540–557.Google Scholar
  60. Vance, S. C.: 1975, ‘Are Socially Responsible Corporations Good Investment Risks?’, Management Review 64(8), 18–24.Google Scholar
  61. Walton, C.: 1992, Corporate Encounters: Ethics, Law & Business Environment (The Dryden Press, Fort Worth TX).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Moses L. Pava
    • 1
  • Joshua Krausz
    • 1
  1. 1.Syms School of BusinessYeshiva UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations