Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 309–314 | Cite as

Corporate social investments: Do they pay?

  • G. Steven McMillan
Article

Abstract

The stock market reaction to two very different corporate social investments (the 1977 Sullivan Principles adoption announcement and the 1990 McDonald's Corporation environmental statement) is explored. A market model event study methodology is employed using daily stock returns. The results are that the stock market appears to have ignored the 1977 announcement, but rewarded the 1990 event. Future research and possible managerial implications are discussed.

Keywords

Economic Growth Stock Market Stock Return Event Study Market Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander, G. and R. Bucholtz: 1978, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Stock Market Performance’, Academy of Management Journal 21, 479–486.Google Scholar
  2. Bowen, H. R.: 1953, Social Responsibilities of the Businessman (Harper, New York).Google Scholar
  3. Brown, S. J. and J. B. Warner: 1980, ‘Measuring Security Price Performance’, Journal of Financial Economics 8, 205–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clarkson, M. B. E.: 1990, ‘Defining and evaluating corporate social performance: The stakeholder management model’, paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  5. Coffey, B. S. and G. E. Fryxell: 1991, ‘Institutional Ownership of Stock and Dimensions of Corporate Social Performance: An Empirical Examination’, Journal of Business Ethics 10, 437–444.Google Scholar
  6. Council on Economic Priorities: 1987, Rating America's Social Conscience (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
  7. Freedman, M. and B. Jaggi: 1986, ‘An Analysis of the Impact of Corporate Pollution Disclosures Included in Annual Financial Statements on Investments Decisions’, Advances in Public Interest Accounting, 193–212.Google Scholar
  8. Jensen, M. C. and R. Ruback: 1983, ‘The Market for Corporate Control: The Scientific Evidence’, Journal of Financial Economics 11 3–50.Google Scholar
  9. Kleiner, A.: 1991, ‘What Does It Mean to be Green?’, Harvard Business Review (July–August), 38–47.Google Scholar
  10. Lodge, G. C. and J. F. Rayport: 1991, ‘Knee-deep and Rising: America's Recycling Crisis’, Harvard Business Review (Sept–Oct).Google Scholar
  11. McGuire, J. B., A. Sundgren and T. Schneeweis: 1988, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance’, Academy of Management Journal 31, 854–872.Google Scholar
  12. Miles, R. A.: 1987, Managing the Corporate Social Environment (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs).Google Scholar
  13. Montgomery, C. A. and A. R. Thomas: 1988, ‘Divestment: Motives and Gains’, Strategic Management Journal 9, 93–97.Google Scholar
  14. Patten, D. M.: 1990, ‘The Market Reaction to Social Responsibilities Disclosures: The Case of the Sullivan Principles Signings’, Accounting, Organizations, and Society 15, 575–587.Google Scholar
  15. Paul, K.: 1989, ‘Corporate Social Monitoring in South Africa: A Decade of Achievement, an Uncertain Future’, Journal of Business Ethics 8, 463–469.Google Scholar
  16. Shane, P. B. and B. H. Spicer: 1983, ‘Market Response to Environmental Information Produced Outside the Firm’, The Accounting Review (July), 521–538.Google Scholar
  17. Singh, H. and C. A. Montgomery: 1987, ‘Corporate Acquisition Strategies and Economic Performance’, Strategic Management Journal 8, 377–386.Google Scholar
  18. Torabzadeh, K. M., D. Davidson and H. Assar: 1989, ‘The Effect of the Recent Insider-Trading Scandal on Stock Prices of Securities Firms’, Journal of Business Ethics 8, 299–303.Google Scholar
  19. Wayne, L.: 1993, ‘Doing Good But Not So Well’, The New York Times, Dec. 18.Google Scholar
  20. Wood, D. J.: 1991a, ‘Social Issues in Management: Theory and Research in Corporate Social Performance’, Journal of Management 17, 383–406.Google Scholar
  21. Wood, D. J.: 1991b, ‘Corporate Social Performance Revisited’, Academy of Management Review 16, 691–718.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Steven McMillan
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of General & Strategic Management, School of Business and ManagementTemple UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations