Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 7, Issue 8, pp 575–584 | Cite as

Confucian ethics and Japanese management practices

  • Marc J. Dollinger

Abstract

This paper proposes that an important method for understanding the ethics of Japanese management is the systematic study of its Confucian traditions and the writings of Confucius. Inconsistencies and dysfunction in Japanese ethical and managerial behavior can be attributed to contradictions in Confucius' writings and inconsistencies between the Confucian code and modern realities. Attention needs to be directed to modern Confucian philosophy since, historically Confucian thought has been an early warning system for impending change.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abegglen, J. C. and Stalk, G.: 1985, Kaisha, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  2. Abegglen, J. C. and Stalk, G.: 1986, ‘The Japanese corporation as competitor’, California Management Review 28, 9–27.Google Scholar
  3. Adler, N. J., Doktor, R., and Redding, S. G.: 1986, ‘From the Atlantic to the Pacific Century: Cross-cultural management reviewed’, Journal of Management 12, 295–318.Google Scholar
  4. Borton, H.: 1970, Japan's Modern Century, New York: Roland Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bresler, L.: 1986, ‘You won't find a bargain in Tokyo’, Wall Street Journal, October 20, p. 21.Google Scholar
  6. Browning, E. S.: 1986, ‘Job-hopping in Japan’, Wall Street Journal, September 9, p. 1.Google Scholar
  7. Buckley, P. J. and Mirza, H.: 1985, ‘The wit and wisdom of Japanese management: An iconoclastic analysis’, Management International Review 25, 16–29.Google Scholar
  8. Chan, W. T.: 1963, Source Book in Chinese Philosophy, Princeton, N.J.: University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Chan, W. T. (ed.): 1986, Chu Hsi and Neo-Confucianism, Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  10. de Bary, W. T.: 1958, Sources of Japanese Tradition: Volume 1, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Dillon, L. S.: 1983, ‘Adapting Japanese management: Some cultural stumbling blocks’, Personnel, July–August, 73–77.Google Scholar
  12. Dore, R. P.: 1965, ‘The legacy of Tokugawa education’, in M. Jansen (ed.), Changing Japanese Attitudes toward Modernization, pp. 99–133, Princeton, N.J.: University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Dunphy, D.: 1987, ‘Convergence/divergence: A temporal review of the Japanese enterprise and its management’, Academy of Management Review 12, 445–459.Google Scholar
  14. Fairbank, J. K., Reischauer, E. O., and Craig, A.: 1965, East Asia: The Great Tradition, Volume 2, Boston: Houghton, Mifflin.Google Scholar
  15. Hall, J. W.: 1970, Japan: From Pre-History to Modern Times, New York: Dell.Google Scholar
  16. Hamada, T.: 1985, ‘Corporation, culture and environment: The Japanese model’, Asian Survey 25, 1215–1228.Google Scholar
  17. Hayes, R. H.: 1981, ‘Why Japanese factories work’, Harvard Business Review, July–August, 56–66.Google Scholar
  18. Hofstede, G.: 1983, ‘The cultural relativity of organizational practices and theories’, Journal of International Business Studies, Fall, 75–90.Google Scholar
  19. Irish, J. S.: 1986, ‘A Yankee learns to bow’, New York Times Magazine Part II, June 8, p. 38.Google Scholar
  20. Jaeger, A. M. and Baliga, B. R.: 1985, ‘Control systems and strategic adaptation: Lessons from the Japanese experience’, Strategic Management Journal 6, 115–134.Google Scholar
  21. Jansen, M. B.: 1965, ‘Changing Japanese attitudes toward modernization’, in M. B. Jansen (ed.), Changing Japanese Attitudes toward Modernization, pp. 43–97, Princeton N.J.: University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Jansen, M. B.: 1965a, ‘Tokugawa and modern Japan’, in J. W. Hall and M. B. Jansen (eds.), Studies in the Institutional History of Early Modern Japan, pp. 317–330, Princeton, N.J.: University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Kagono, T., Nonaka, I., Sakakibara, K., and Okumura, A.: 1985, Strategic versus Evolutionary Management: A U.S.-Japan Comparison of Strategy and Organization, Amsterdam Holland: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  24. Kaplan, A.: 1964, The Conduct of Inquiry, New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  25. Keys, J. B. and Miller, J. R.: 1984, ‘The Japanese management theory jungle’, Academy of Management Review 9, 342–353.Google Scholar
  26. MacFarquhar, R.: 1980, ‘The post-Confucian challenge’, The Economist, February 9, p. 74.Google Scholar
  27. Maruyama, M.: 1965, ‘Patterns of individuation and the case of Japan’, in M. B. Jansen (ed.), Changing Japanese Attitudes toward Modernization, pp. 489–532, Princeton, N.J.: University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Morey, N. C. and Luthans, F.: 1984, ‘An emic perspective and ethnoscience methods for organizational research’, Academy of Management Review 9, 27–36.Google Scholar
  29. Morgan, J. P.: 1985, ‘The facts about just-in-time, Japan, and Japanese business’, Purchasing, December 19, pp. 43–50.Google Scholar
  30. Munchus, G.: 1983, ‘Employer-employee based quality circles in Japan: Human resource policy implications for American firms’, Academy of Management Review 8, 255–261.Google Scholar
  31. Nonaka, I. and Johansson, J. K.: 1985, ‘Japanese management: What about the hard skills?’, Academy of Management Review 10, 181–191.Google Scholar
  32. Ouchi, W. G.: 1981, Theory Z, Reading Mass: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  33. Pascale, R. T.: 1978, ‘Zen and the art of management’, Harvard Business Review, April–May, 153–162.Google Scholar
  34. Passin, H.: 1965, ‘Modernization and the Japanese intellectual: Some comparative observations’, in M. B. Jansen (ed.), Changing Japanese Attitudes towards Modernization, pp. 447–487, Princeton, N.J.: University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Popper, T., Janow, M. E. and Wheeler, J. W.: 1985, The Competition, New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  36. Reischauer, E. O. and Fairbank, J. K.: 1960, East Asia: The Great Tradition, Boston: Houghton, Mifflin.Google Scholar
  37. Selltiz, C., Wrightsman, L., and Cook, S.: 1976, Research Methods in Social Relations, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  38. Sethi, S. P., Namiki, N., and Swanson, C. L.: 1984, The False Promise of the Japanese Miracle, Boston: Pittman Press.Google Scholar
  39. Steffy, B. D. and Grimes, A. J.: 1986, ‘A critical theory of organization science’, Academy of Management Review 11, 322–336.Google Scholar
  40. Sullivan, J. J.: 1983, ‘A critique of Theory Z’, Academy of Management Review 8, 132–142.Google Scholar
  41. Tsurumi, Y.: 1978, ‘The best of times and the worst of times: Japanese management in America’, Columbia Journal of World Business 13, 56–61.Google Scholar
  42. Wall Street Journal, 1987, March 27, p. 15.Google Scholar
  43. Weber, M.: 1951, The Religion of China: Confucianism and Taoism, H. H. Gerth (tr. and ed.), New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marc J. Dollinger
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ManagementIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations