Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 93–103 | Cite as

Justifying moral initiative by business, with rejoinders to Bill Shaw and Richard Nunan

  • Thomas M. Mulligan
Article

Abstract

In this paper I respond to separate criticisms by Bill Shaw (JBE, July 1988) and Richard Nunan (JBE, December 1988) of my paper “A Critique of Milton Friedman's Essay ‘The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits’” (JBE, August 1986). Professors Shaw and Nunan identify several points where my argument could benefit from clarification and improvement. They also make valuable contributions to the discussion of the broad issue area of whether and to what extent business should exercise moral initiative.

My objectives are (1) to show, with the aid of examples (inspired by Shaw) and the addition of one point of correction (inspired by Nunan), that my disapproving critique of Friedman's famous argument remains sound, (2) to show that Professor Shaw's argument contains serious problems, and (3) to build on the base laid by my critics by developing important reasons why business should exercise moral initiative.

Keywords

Economic Growth Social Responsibility Clarification Milton Valuable Contribution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ackerman, R. W. and R. A. Bauer: 1976, Corporate Social Responsiveness: The Modern Dilemna [sic] (Reston Publishing, Reston, VA).Google Scholar
  2. Buchholz, Rogene A., W. D. Evans, and R. A. Wagley: 1985, Management Response to Public Issues: Concepts and Cases in Strategy Formulation (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
  3. Buchholz, Rogene A., W. D. Evans, and R. A. Wagley: 1989, Management Response to Public Issues: Concepts and Cases in Strategy Formulation, 2nd ed. (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
  4. DeGeorge, Richard T.: 1986, Business Ethics, 2nd ed. (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
  5. Donaldson, Thomas: 1982, Corporations and Morality (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
  6. Evan, William M. and R. Edward Freeman: 1988, ‘A Stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation: Kantian Capitalism’, In Tom Beauchamp and Norman Bowie (eds.), Ethical Theory and Business, 3rd ed. (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ), pp. 97–106.Google Scholar
  7. Frederick, William C.: 1986, ‘Toward CSR3: Why Ethical Analysis is Indispensible and Unavoidable in Corporate Affairs’, California Management Review 28, 126–141.Google Scholar
  8. Freeman, R. Edward: 1984, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (Pitman, Boston).Google Scholar
  9. Freeman, R. Edward and Daniel R. Gilbert: 1988, Corporate Strategy and the Search for Ethics (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
  10. French, Peter A.: 1979, ‘The Corporation as a Moral Person’, American Philosophical Quarterly 16, 297–317.Google Scholar
  11. Friedman, Milton: 1962, Capitalism and Freedom (U. of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  12. Friedman, Milton: 1970, ‘A Friedman Doctrine — The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits’, The New York Times Magazine, 13 Sept. 1970, 32 ff.Google Scholar
  13. Friedman, Milton: 1975, There's No Such Thing as a Free Lunch (Open Court, La Salle, IL). Also published as An Economist's Protest, 2nd ed. (1975, Thomas Horton, Glen Ridge NJ). The passage quoted was originally published in an interview of Friedman by John McClaughry in Business and Society Review, Spring, 1972.Google Scholar
  14. Friedman, Milton and Rose Friedman: 1980, Free to Choose: A Personal Statement (Avon, New York).Google Scholar
  15. Goodpaster, Kenneth and J. Matthews: 1982, ‘Can a Corporation Have a Conscience?’ Harvard Business Review 60, 132–141.Google Scholar
  16. Gordon, Michael R. with Stephen Engelberg: 1989, ‘Poison Gas Fears Lead U.S. to Plan New Export Curbs’, The New York Times, 26 March 1989, 1.Google Scholar
  17. Hosmer, LaRue Tone: 1984, ‘Managerial Ethics and Microeconomic Theory’, Journal of Business Ethics 3, 315–325. Reprinted in Hosmer, LaRue Tone: 1987, The Ethics of Management (Irwin, Homewood IL).Google Scholar
  18. Langton, J. F. and A. Y. Lewin: 1982, ‘Dinosaurs Did Not Survive’, Enterprise 1, 14–19.Google Scholar
  19. Levitt, Theodore: 1958, ‘The Dangers of Social Responsibility’, Harvard Business Review, September–October, 41–50.Google Scholar
  20. Mulligan, Thomas: 1986, ‘A Critique of Milton Friedman's Essay “The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits”’, Journal of Business Ethics 5, 265–269.Google Scholar
  21. Nunan, Richard: 1988, ‘The Libertarian Conception of Corporate Property: A Critique of Milton Friedman's Views on the Social Responsibility of Business’, Journal of Business Ethics 7, 891–906.Google Scholar
  22. Peters, Thomas J. and Robert H. Waterman Jr.: 1982, In Search of Excellence (Warner, New York).Google Scholar
  23. Preston, L. E. and J. E. Post: 1975, Private Management and Public Policy (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ). In 1988 the abiding influence of this book was recognized when its authors were given the Howard Chase Book Award by the Social Issues in Management division of the Academy of Management.Google Scholar
  24. Sethi, S Prakash, Nobuaki Namiki, and Carl L. Swanson: 1984, The False Promise of the Japanese Miracle: Illusions and Realities of the Japanese Management System (Pitman, Boston).Google Scholar
  25. Shaw, Bill: 1988, ‘A Reply to Thomas Mulligan's Critique of Milton Friedman's Essay “The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits”, Journal of Business Ethics, 7, 537–543.Google Scholar
  26. Stone, Christopher: 1975, Where the Law Ends: The Social Control of Corporate Behavior (Harper and Row, Evanston IL).Google Scholar
  27. Velasquez, Manuel G: 1983, ‘Why Corporations Are Not Responsible for Anything They Do’, Business and Professional Ethics Journal 2, 1–17.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas M. Mulligan
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Business AdministrationBrock UniversitySt. CatharinesCanada

Personalised recommendations