Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

On the antecedents of corporate severance agreements: An empirical assessment

Abstract

This study of major corporations (n=481) provides an empirical assessment of the effects of several corporate governance variables (CEO duality, boards of director composition, officers and directors common stock holdings, institutional common stock holdings, number of majority owners) on the adoption of so-called severance agreements. A discriminant analysis indicates a significant multivariate function. Wilks lambda univariate analyses suggest that the percentage of common stock held by owners and directors and number of majority stock holders are the more robust discriminators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Alibrandi, J. F.: 1985, ‘A CEO's dream board’, in E. Mattar and M. Ball (eds.), Handbook for Corporate Directors (pp. 23.1–23.5), New York: McGraw-Hill.

  2. Anderson, C. A. and Anthony, R. N.: 1986, The New Corporate Directors, New York: John Wiley & Sons.

  3. Bacon, J. and Brown, J. K.: 1984, The Board of Directors: Perspectives and Practices in Nine Countries, New York: The Conference Board, Inc.

  4. Berg, S. V. and Smith, S. K.: 1978, ‘CEO and board chairman: A quantitative study of dual vs. unitary board leadership’, Directors and Boards 3, 34–39.

  5. Bleicher, K. and Paul, H.: 1985, ‘Corporate governance systems in a multinational environment: Who knows what's best?’, in L. L. Waters (ed.), A Time for New Strategies, Bloomington, In. International Business Forum, 70–87.

  6. Business Week: 1984, An assault on golden parachutes and ‘greenmail’, August 13: 58.

  7. Business Week: 1986, Let's stow those golden chutes, May 5: 132.

  8. Chaganti, R. S., Mahajan, V., and Sharma, S.: 1985, ‘Corporate board size, composition and corporate failures in retailing industry’, Journal of Management Studies 22, 400–417.

  9. Cochran, R. L. and Wartick, S. L.: 1984, ‘“Golden parachutes”: A closer look’, California Management Review 26, 111–125.

  10. Cochran, R. L., Wood, R. A., and Jones, T. B.: 1985, ‘The composition of boards of directors and incidence of golden parachutes’, Academy of Management Journal 28, 664–671.

  11. Dalton, D. R. and Kesner, I. F.: 1987, ‘Composition and CEO duality in boards of directors: An international perspective’, Journal of International Business Studies 28, 33–42.

  12. Dalton, D. R., Kesner, I. F., and Rechner, P. L.: In press, ‘Corporate governance & boards of directors: An international, comparative perspective’, in R. Farmer (ed.), Advances in International Comparative Management, Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.

  13. Dayton, K. N.: 1984, ‘Corporate governance: The other side of the coin’, Harvard Business Review 62(1), 34–37.

  14. Feure, M.: 1965, Handbook for Corporate Directors, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.

  15. Geneen, H.: 1984a, Managing, Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Co., Inc.

  16. Geneen, H. S.: 1984b, ‘Why directors can't protect the stockholders’, Fortune, September 17: 28–32.

  17. Herman, E. S.: 1981, Corporate Control, Corporate Power, London: Cambridge University Press.

  18. Kesner, I. F., Victor, B., and Lamont, B. T.: 1986, ‘Board composition and the commission of illegal acts: An investigation of Fortune 500 companies’, Academy of Management Journal 29, 789–799.

  19. Lauenstein, M.: 1980, ‘Organizing to develop strategic strategy’, Journal of Business Strategy 1, 70–73.

  20. Levy, L.: 1981, ‘Reforming board reform’, Harvard Business Review 59(1), pp. 166–172.

  21. Louden, J. K.: 1985, ‘The board chair: Models, changing roll, and external communication officer function’, in E. Mattar and M. Ball (eds.), Handbook for Corporate Directors (pp. 4.1–4.5), New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.

  22. McLaughlin, D. J.: 1982, ‘On golden parachutes’, Directors & Boards, Summer: 22–25.

  23. Mills, G.: 1981, On the Board, Hampshire: Gower Publishing Company Ltd.

  24. Mintzberg, H.: 1983, Power In and Around Organizations, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.

  25. Mueller, R. K.: 1978, New Directions for Directors, Lexington, Mass.: D. C. Heath & Co.

  26. O'Connell, J. J.: 1984, ‘Corporate governance: The European challenge’, in W. M. Hoffman, J. M. Moore, and D. A. Fedo (eds.), Corporate Governance and Institutionalizing Ethics, Lexington, MA.: Lexington Books, 49–54.

  27. Scotese, P. G.: 1985, ‘Fold up those golden parachutes’, Harvard Business Review, March–April: 168–171.

  28. Spencer, A.: 1983, On the Edge of the Organization: The Role of the Outside Director, New York: John Wiley & Sons.

  29. Steckmest, F. W.: 1982, Corporate Performance, New York: McGraw-Hill.

  30. Stroeberl, P. A. and Sherony, B. C.: 1985, ‘Board efficiency and effectiveness’, in E. Mattar (ed.), Handbook for Corporate Directors, New York: McGraw Hill: 12.1–12.10.

  31. Vance, S. C.: 1983, Corporate Leadership: Boards, Directors and Strategy, New York: McGraw-Hill.

  32. Waldo, Charles N.: 1985, Board of Directors: Their Changing Roles, Structure, and Information Needs, Westport, CT: Quorum Books.

  33. Williams, H. M.: 1979, January 8, “Corporate accountability — One year later”, address to the sixth annual Securities Regulation Institute, San Diego, CA.

  34. Williams, H. M.: 1980, In Securities and Exchange Commission, Staff Report on Corporate Accountability, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Download references

Author information

Additional information

Dan R. Dalton is Professor of Management and Director of Doctoral Programs, Graduate School of Business, Indiana University. Formerly with General Telephone & Electronics (GT&E) for thirteen years, he received his Ph.D. from the University of California. Widely published in business and psychology, his articles have appeared in the Academy of Management Journal, Academy of Management Review, Journal of Applied Psychology, Journal of Business Ethics, Strategic Management Journal, Journal of Business Strategy, Behavioral Science, and Human Relations, as well as many others. He is the co-author of Case Problems in Management, Applied Readings in Personnel and Human Resource Management, and the forthcoming Absenteeism, Transfer, Turnover: An Interdependent Perspective. Professor Dalton is also co-principal investigator working on a five year grant provided by the General Motors Foundation in the general area of personnel policy.

Paula L. Rechner is an Assistant Professor in the area of Strategic Management at the University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana. She received her Ph.D. from Indiana University in 1986. Her primary research interest is corporate governance; specifically, her work has focused on corporate boards of directors and board leadership. In addition, she has been actively involved in research projects concerning strategic decision making, corporate control issues, and improving research methodology. Her articles have appeared in Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Strategic Management Journal, and Academy of Management Executive, as well as others.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dalton, D.R., Rechner, P.L. On the antecedents of corporate severance agreements: An empirical assessment. J Bus Ethics 8, 455–462 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00381811

Download citation

Keywords

  • Economic Growth
  • Univariate Analysis
  • Discriminant Analysis
  • Corporate Governance
  • Empirical Assessment