Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 15, Issue 7, pp 805–814 | Cite as

Consumer ethics: An assessment of individual behavior in the market place

  • Sam Fullerton
  • Kathleen B. Kerch
  • H. Robert Dodge
Article

Abstract

A national sample of 362 respondents assessed the ethical predisposition of the American marketplace by calculating a consumer ethics index. The results indicate that the population is quite intolerant of perceived ethical abuses. The situations where consumers are ambivalent tend to be those where the seller suffers little or no economic harm from the consumer's action. Younger, more educated, and higher income consumers appear more accepting of these transgressions. The results provided the basis for developing a four-group taxonomy of consumers which retailers should find insightful in assessing potential consumer actions in a variety of situations.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allport, G.: 1935, ‘Attitudes’, in C. Murchison (ed.), Handbook of Social Psychology (Clark University Press, Worchester, MA), pp. 798–884.Google Scholar
  2. Berry, L. L.: 1993, ‘Playing Fair in Retailing’, Arthur Anderson Retailing Issues Newsletter 5(2).Google Scholar
  3. Cox, D., A. D. Cox and G. P. Moschis: 1990, ‘When Consumer Behavior Goes Bad: An Investigation of Adolescent Shoplifting’, Journal of Consumer Research 17, 149–159.Google Scholar
  4. Day, G. S.: 1973, ‘Attitudes and Attitude Change’, in H. H. Kassarjian and T. S. Robertson (eds.), Perspectives in Consumer Behavior, Rev. ed. (Scott, Foresman and Company, Glenville, IL), pp. 188–209.Google Scholar
  5. DePaulo, P.J.: 1987, ‘Ethical Perceptions of Deceptive Bargaining Tactics Used by Salespersons and Consumers, A Double Standard’, in J. G. Saegert, (ed.), Proceedings of the Division of Consumer Psychology (American Psychological Association), pp. 201–203.Google Scholar
  6. Devlin, S. J., H. K. Dong and M. Brown: 199?, ‘Selecting a Scale for Measuring Quality’, Marketing Research 5(3), 12–17.Google Scholar
  7. Grove, S. J., S. J. Vitell and D. Strutton: 1989, ‘Non-normative Consumer Behavior and the Techniques of Neutralization’, in R. Bagozzi and J. P. Peter (eds.), Proceedings of the 1989 AMA Winter Educators' Conference (American Marketing Association).Google Scholar
  8. Hunt, S. D. and S. Vitell: 1986, ‘A General Theory of Marketing Ethics’, Journal of Macromarketing 6, 5–16.Google Scholar
  9. Kiesler, C. A., B. E. Collins and N. Miller: 1969, Attitude Change: A Critical Analysis of Theoretical Approaches (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York).Google Scholar
  10. Klemke, L. W.: 1982, ‘Exploring Adolescent Shoplifting’, Sociology and Social Research 67(1), 59–75.Google Scholar
  11. Laczniak, G. R. and P. E Murphy: 1985, Marketing Ethics Guidelines for Managers (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA).Google Scholar
  12. Loucks, V. R.: 1987, ‘A CEO Looks at Ethics’, Business Horizons (March/April), 4.Google Scholar
  13. Morgan, R. M. and S. D. Hung: 1994, ‘The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing’, Journal of Marketing 58, 20–38.Google Scholar
  14. Muncy, J. A. and S. J. Vitell: 1992 ‘Consumer Ethics: An Investigation of the Ethical Beliefs of the Final Consumer’, Journal of Business Research 24, 297–311.Google Scholar
  15. Murphy, P. and M. D. Pridgen: 1987 ‘Ethical and Legal Issues in Marketing’, Southern Marketings Associations's Marketing Ethics Workshop.Google Scholar
  16. Nunnally, Y. C.: 1978, Psychometric Theory (McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York).Google Scholar
  17. Sherif, M. and C. W. Sherif: 1967 ‘Attitude as the Individual's Own Categories: The Social Judgment-Involvement Approach to Attitude and Attitude Change’, in M. Sherif and C. W. Sherif (eds.), Attitude, Ego-Involvement, and Change (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York) pp. 105–139.Google Scholar
  18. Solomon, R. C.: 1992, Ethics and Excellence (Oxford University Press, Oxford).Google Scholar
  19. Tajfel, H. and A. L. Wilkes: 1963, ‘Salience of Attitudes and Commitment to Extreme Judgments in the Perception of People’, British Journal of Social Clinical Psychology 2, 40–49.Google Scholar
  20. Vitell, S. and J. Muncy: 1992, ‘Consumer Ethics: An Empirical Investigation of Factors Influencing Ethical Judgments of the Final Consumer’, Journal of Business Ethics 11, 585–597.Google Scholar
  21. Vitell, S. J. and T. Festervand: 1987 ‘Business Conflicts: Conflicts, Practices and Beliefs of Industrial Executives’, Journal of Business Ethics 6, 111–122.Google Scholar
  22. Vitell, S. J., J. R. Lumpkin and M. Y. A. Rawwas: 1991, ‘Consumer Ethics: An Investigation of the Ethical beliefs of Elderly Consumers’, Journal of Business Ethics 10, 365–375.Google Scholar
  23. Volkman, J.: 1951 ‘Scales of Judgment and Their Implications For Social Psychology’, in J. H. Rohrer and M. Sherif (eds.), Social Psychology of the Crossroads (Harper, New York), p. 22.Google Scholar
  24. Wilkes, R. E.: 1978, ‘Fraudulent Behavior by Consumers’, Journal of Marketing 42, 67–75.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sam Fullerton
    • 1
  • Kathleen B. Kerch
    • 1
  • H. Robert Dodge
    • 1
  1. 1.Eastern Michigan UniversityYpsilantiUSA

Personalised recommendations