Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 8, Issue 5, pp 375–381 | Cite as

Differences in research ethics judgments between male and female marketing professionals

  • Ishmael P. Akaah
Article

Abstracts

With the unprecedented increase in the number of females holding executive positions in business, there has arisen interest in issues pertaining to the role of women in business organizations, including that of malefemale differences in ethical attitudes/behavior. To add to the research evidence on the issue, this paper examines differences in research ethics judgments between male and female marketing professionals. The results indicate that female marketing professionals evince higher research ethics judgments than their male counterparts.

Keywords

Economic Growth Marketing Research Ethic Research Evidence Male Counterpart 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Armstrong, Scott J., and Terry S. Overton: 1977, ‘Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys’, Journal of Marketing Research 14 (August), 396–402.Google Scholar
  2. Beltramini, Richard F., Robert A. Peterson, and George Kozmetsky: 1984, ‘Concerns of College Students Regarding Business Ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics 3, 195–200.Google Scholar
  3. Bommer, Michael, Clarence Gratto, Jerry Gravander, and Mark Tuttle: 1987, ‘A Behavioral Model of Ethical and Unethical Decision Making’, Journal of Business Ethics 6, 265–280.Google Scholar
  4. Braverman, Inge K., Susan R. Vogel, Donald M. Broverman, Frank E. Clarkson, Paul S. Rosenkrantz: ‘Sex-Role Stereotypes: A Current Appraisal’, Journal of Social Studies 28, 58–78.Google Scholar
  5. Cain, Glen G.: 1966, Married Women in the Labor Force, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Crawford, Merle C.: 1970, ‘Attitudes of Marketing Executives Toward Ethics in Marketing Research’, Journal of Marketing 34 (April), 46–52.Google Scholar
  7. Ferrell, O. C. and Steven J. Skinner: 1988, ‘Ethical Behavior and Bureaucratic Structure in Marketing Research Organizations’, Journal of Marketing Research 25 (February), 103–109.Google Scholar
  8. Fortune: 1986, ‘The Decline and Fall of Business Ethics (Profit-at-Any-Price Malaise is Spreading Through Investment Banking and Reaching Into Industries as Well)’, (December), 65–66.Google Scholar
  9. Freeman, Sue J. M. and John W. Giebink: 1979, ‘Moral Judgment as a Function of Age, Sex, and Stimulus’, Journal of Applied Psychology 102, 43–47.Google Scholar
  10. Fry, Fred L. and Robert J. Hock: 1976, ‘Who Claims Corporate Responsibility? The Biggest and the Worst’, Business and Society Review 18 (Summer), 62–5.Google Scholar
  11. Hayghe, H.: 1975, ‘Marital and Family Characteristics of the Labor Force, March 1974’, Special Labor Force Report 173, Washington: U.S. Department of Labor Statistics.Google Scholar
  12. Hegarty, Harvey W. and Henry P. Sims: 1979, ‘Organizational Philosophy, Policies, and Objectives Related to Unethical Decision Behavior: A Laboratory Experiment’, Journal of Applied Psychology 64, 331–338.Google Scholar
  13. Hegarty, Harvey W. and Henry P. Sims: 1978, ‘Some Determinants of Unethical Decision Behavior: An Experiment’, Journal of Applied Psychology 63, 451–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hunt, Shelby D., Lawrence B. Choko, and James B. Wilcox: 1984, ‘Ethical Problems of Marketing Researchers’, Journal of Marketing Research 21 (August), 309–324.Google Scholar
  15. Kidwell Jeaneen M., Robert E. Stevens, and Art L. Bethke: 1987, ‘Differences in Ethical Perceptions Between Male and Female Managers: Myth or Reality’? Journal of Business Ethics 6, 489–493.Google Scholar
  16. Kohlberg, L.: 1969, ‘Stage and Sequence: The Cognitive-Developmental Approach to Socialization’, in D. Goslin (ed.), Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research. Chicago: Rand McNally, pp. 347–480.Google Scholar
  17. Marketing News: 1987, ‘AMA Adopts New Code of Ethics’, (September 11), 1.Google Scholar
  18. Murphy, Patrick E. and Gene R. Laczniak: 1981, ‘Marketing Ethics' A Review with Implications for Managers, Educators and Researchers’, in Review of Marketing 1981, Ben M. Enis and Kenneth J. Roering, eds. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 251–266.Google Scholar
  19. Ricklets, Roger: 1983, ‘Executives and General Public Say Ethical Behavior is Declining in U.S.’, Wall Street Journal, (October 31), 33.Google Scholar
  20. Scanzoni, John: 1977, ‘Changing Sex Roles and Emerging Directions in Family Decision Making’, Journal of Consumer Research 3, 185–188.Google Scholar
  21. Staw, Barry M. and Eugene Szwajkowski: 1975, ‘The Scarcity-Munificence Component of Organizational Environments and the Commission of Illegal Acts’, Administrative Science Quarterly 20, 345–354.Google Scholar
  22. Sturdivant, Frederick and A. Benton Cocanougher: 1972, ‘What Are Ethical Marketing Practices?’ Harvard Business Review 51 (November–December), 10–12.Google Scholar
  23. Time: 1987, ‘Cover Story: What Ever Happened to Ethics’, (May 25), 14–29.Google Scholar
  24. Venkatesh, Alladi: 1980, ‘Changing Roles of Women — A Life-Style Analysis’, Journal of Consumer Research 7 (September), 189–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ishmael P. Akaah
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of MarketingWayne State UniversityDetroitUSA

Personalised recommendations