Biological monitoring of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid-exposed workers in agriculture and forestry

  • Dietmar Knopp
  • Steffi Glass
Article

Summary

This is a report on the application of a radioimmunossay (RIA) for the herbicide 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) in biological monitoring of occupationally exposed sprayers. Urinalysis was conducted on two workers involved in spraying 2,4-D sodium salt solution with car mounted ground rigs in agriculture and on the pilot and the mixer-loader of a helicopter crew applying 2,4-D dimethylamine salt for brush control in forestry. All sprayers showed detectable quantitities of 2,4-D in morning urine samples voided over 4 or 6 days in the post-spraying period. The highest 2,4-D urinary concentrations of about 2.5 ppm could be measured in a car driver on the 3 day after exposure. The 2,4-D level in urine was much lower in forestry workers, with 0.365 ppm for the mixer-loader and 0.052 ppm for the pilot on the 1 day after spraying. Urinary 2,4-D concentrations in the agricultural study were adjusted for endogenous creatinine and, when normalized for body weight, resulted in a total 2,4-D uptake of about 5.7 or 84.9 μ/kg body wt. for a single spraying operation. Thus, the calculated absorbed dose was less than the NOAEL (no observed adverse effect level) of 10 mg/kg body weight per day by a large margin of safety. Further, the calculated amounts excreted seemed to be sufficiently reliable to be used for assessing the risk of human exposure to 2,4-D. However, more studies are desirable for confirmation of the association of urinary 2,4-D and creatinine excretion. Clearance occurs with a 12-h to 22-h half-life.

Key words

2,4-D Immunoassay Biological monitoring Exposure Human 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arzneibuch der DDR - Diagnostische Laboratoriumsmethoden (1987) Akademie-Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  2. Bräunlich H, Bernhardt H, Bernhardt I (1989) Renal handling of 2-methyl-4-chlorophenoxyacetic acid (MCPA) in rats. J Appl Toxicol 9:255–258PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Defelip E, Didomenico A, Tancredi F, Volpi F, Bagnasco G (1988) Levels of 4-chloro-2-methylphenoxyacetic acid (MCPA) in the urine of northern Italy occupationally exposed agricultural workers. Ecotoxicol Environ Safety 16:170–175PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Frank R, Campbell RA, Sirons GJ (1985) Forestry workers involved in aerial application of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D): exposure and urinary excretion. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 14:427–435Google Scholar
  5. Franklin CA, Grover R, Markham JW, Smith AE, Yoshida K (1982) Effect of various factors on exposure of workers involved in the aerial application of herbicides. Trans Am Conf Ind Hyg 43:97–117Google Scholar
  6. Grover R, Cessna AJ, Muir NI, Riedel D, Franklin CA, Yoshida K (1986a) Factors affecting the exposure of ground-rig applicators to 2,4-dimethylamine salt. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 5:667–686Google Scholar
  7. Grover R, Franklin CA, Muir NI, Cessna AJ, Riedel D (1986b) Dermal exposure and urinary metabolite excretion in farmers repeatedly exposed to 2,4-D amine. Toxicol Lett 33:73–83PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hammock BD, Gee SJ, Cheung PYK, Miyamoto T, Goodrow MJ, Van Emon J, Seiber JN (1987) Utility of immunoassays in pesticide trace analysis. In: Greenhalgh R, Roberts TR (eds) Pesticide science and biotechnology. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, pp 309–316Google Scholar
  9. Jung R, Gee SJ, Harrison RO, Goodrow MH, Karu AE, Braun AL, Li QX, Hammock BD (1989) Use of immunochemical techniques for the analysis of pesticides. Pestic Sci 26:303–317Google Scholar
  10. Kangas J, Soininen H, Klen TR, Riihimäki V (1984) Applicators' exposure to phenoxy acid in forestry. Työterveyslaitoksen Tutkimuksia 2:118–126Google Scholar
  11. Khanna S, Fang SC (1966) Metabolism of 14C-labeled 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid in rats. J Agric Food Chem 14:500–503Google Scholar
  12. Knopp D, Nuhn P, Dobberkau HJ (1985) Radioimmunoassay for 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid. Arch Toxicol 58:27–32PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Knopp D, Degenkolb H, Dobberkau HJ (1989) Immunoassays. Leistungsfähige Analysenmethoden für die umwelttoxikologische Forschung and Praxis. Z Gesamte Hyg 35:122–125Google Scholar
  14. Kohli JD, Khanna RN, Gupta BN, Shar MM, Tandon JS, Sircar KP (1974) Absorption and excretion of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid in man. Xenobiotica 4:97–100PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kolmodin-Hedman B, Erne K (1980) Estimation of occupational exposure to phenoxy acids (2,4-D and 2,4,5-T). Arch Toxicol Suppl 4:318–321PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kolmodin-Hedman B, Höglund S, Akerblom M (1983a) Studies on phenoxy acid herbicides: I. Field study, occupational exposure to phenoxy acid herbicides (MCPA, Dichlorprop, Mecoprop and 2,4-D) in agriculture. Arch Toxicol 54:257–265Google Scholar
  17. Kolmodin-Hedman B, Höglund S, Swensson A, Akerblom M (1983b) Studies on phenoxy acid herbicides: II. Oral and dermal uptake and elimination in urine of MCPA in humans. Arch Toxicol 54:267–273Google Scholar
  18. Koschier FJ, Hong SK (1981) Effect of 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetate on renal function. Food Cosmet Toxicol 1:189–193Google Scholar
  19. Koschier FJ, Pritchard JB (1980) Renal handling of 2,4-D by the dogfish shark. Xenobiotica 10:1–6Google Scholar
  20. Koschier FJ, Girard PR, Hong SK (1978) Transport of 2,4dichlorophenoxyacetate by rat renal cortical slices. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 45:883–894Google Scholar
  21. Lavy TL, Shepard JS, Mattice JD (1980) Exposure measurement of applicators spraying 2,4,5- in the forest. J Agric Food Chem 28:626–630Google Scholar
  22. Lavy TL, Walstad JD, Flynn RR, Mattice JD (1982) (2,4-Dichlorophenoxy) acetic acid exposure received by aerial application crews during forest spray operations. J Agric Food Chem 30:375–381Google Scholar
  23. Libich S, To JC, Frank R, Sirons GJ (1984) Occupational exposure of herbicide applicators to herbicides used along electric power transmission line right-of-way. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 45:56–62PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Lilienfeld DE, Gallo MA (1989) 2,4-D, 2,4,5-T, and 2,3,7,8TCCD: an overview. Epidemiol Rev 11:28–58PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Prescott LF, Park J, Darrien I (1979) Treatment of severe 2,4-D and Mecoprop intoxication with alkaline diuresis. Br J Clin Pharmacol 7:111–116Google Scholar
  26. Pritchard JB, James MO (1979) Determinants of the renal handling of 2,4 dichlorophenoxyacetic acid by winter flounder. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 208:280–286PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Rapoport SM, Raderecht HJ (1977) Physiologisch-chemisches Praktikum. VEB Verlag Volk und Gesundheit, Berlin, p 385Google Scholar
  28. Sauerhoff MW, Braun WH, Blau GE, Gehring PJ (1977) The fate of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) following oral administration to man. Toxicology 8:3–11Google Scholar
  29. Taskar PK, Das YT, Trout JR, Chattopadhyay SK, Brown HD (1982) Measurement of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4D) after occupational exposure. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 29:586–591Google Scholar
  30. Vanderlaan M, Van Emon J, Watkins B, Stanker L (1987) Monoclonal antibodies for the detection of trace chemicals. In: Greenhalgh R, Roberts TR (eds) Pesticide science and biotechnology. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, pp 597–602Google Scholar
  31. Wojeck GA, Price JF, Nigg HN, Stamper JH (1983) Worker exposure to paraquat and diquat. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 12:65–70PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. World Health Organization (1984) 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid. (Environmental health criteria, no 29) WHO, Geneva, p 100Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dietmar Knopp
    • 1
  • Steffi Glass
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute for Water, Soil and Air Hygiene of the Federal Health OfficeResearch Department Bad ElsterBad ElsterGermany
  2. 2.Municipal Out-Patient DepartmentBad ElsterGermany

Personalised recommendations