Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Practical approaches to the assessment of work-related risks

  • 31 Accesses

  • 2 Citations

Summary

The control of work-related risks calls for practical improvements in job content and the working environment. For assessment of risks, it is essential to resort to the most practical methods in the local context. Important common methods are examination of the process, equipment and organisation of work, walk-through surveys, evaluation of risk factors in the working environment, inquiries and questionnaires as well as monitoring of various health indicators. Biological tests and other health indicators can thus only be regarded as components of overall occupational health-risk assessment strategy, with their advantages, disadvantages and limitations. Important are the validity of biological tests and the ethical aspects related to their use, such as confidentiality of data and the individual worker's informed consent, preference being given to noninvasive-methods. Occupational health services should thus play a positive role by providing practical advice, training and information for participatory risk assessment keeping in view such an overall strategy that facilitates immediate preventive action. Biological monitoring should be applied when the additional guidance it provides on preventive action is essential. Proposals to use biological monitoring must emphasise this justification aspect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Coppée GH (1989) Les contributions de la médecine du travail a la santé au travail — l'approche de l'Organisation internationsle du travail. Revue française des affaires sociales 43:45–74

  2. Cressey P, Di Martino V (1989) Technological participation:options and constraints in human resources management and industrial relations. In: Bamber GJ, Lansbury RD (eds) New technology: international perspectives on human resources and industrial relations. Unwin Hyman, London, pp 135–155

  3. Gustavsen B, Oscarsson B (1991) Initiatives for change and government programmes. In: On business and work towards new frontiers. International Labour Office, Geneva, pp 133–163

  4. International Commission on Occupational Health (ICOH) (1992) Code of ethics for occupational health professionals, ICOH, Singapore

  5. ILO (1980) Code of practice on occupational exposure to airborne substances harmful to health. International Labour Office, Geneva

  6. ILO (1984) Improving working conditions and environment: an International Programme (PIACT). International Labour Office, Geneva

  7. ILO (1986) Psychosocial factors at work: recognition and control. International Labour Office, Geneva

  8. International Labour Conference 70th Session (1984) Report V (l), Occupational health services. International Labour Office, Geneva

  9. Kogi K (1985) Improving working conditions in small enterprises in developing Asia. International Labour Office, Geneva

  10. Kogi K (1991a) Job content and working time: the scope for joint change. Ergonomics 34:757–773

  11. Kogi K (1991b) Safety and health needs of working populations: the role of occupational health services. In: Rantanen J, Lehtinen S (eds) New trends and developments in occupational health services. Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, pp 3–9

  12. Kogi K (1991c) Participatory training for low-cost improvements in small enterprises in developing countries. In: Noro K, Imada A (eds) Participatory ergonomics. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 73–80

  13. Kogi K, Phoon WO, Thurman JE (1988) Low-cost ways of improving working conditions: 100 examples from Asia. International Labour Office, Geneva

  14. Lauwerys R, Bernard A (1991) Biological monitoring in occupational health. In: Rantanen J, Lehtinen S (eds) New trends and developments in occupational health services. Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, pp 81–86

  15. Rantanen J (ed) (1990) Occupational health services: an overview. WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen

  16. Reichs MR, Okubo T (eds) (1992) Protecting workers' health in the Third World, national and international strategies. Auburn House, Westport

  17. Rutenfranz J (1982) Occupational health measures for night- and shiftworkers. In: Kogi K, Miura T, Saito H (eds) Shiftwork: its practice and improvement. Journal of Human Ergology 11, Supplement, 67–86

  18. Wedderbum A (1989) Negotiating shorter working hours in the European Community: Bulletin of European shift work topics, no. 1. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, Dublin

  19. WHO Regional Office for Europe (1990). Occupational Health for the 1990s: Proceedings of a WHO Symposium, Amsterdam, 13–16 March 1990. WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen.

Download references

Author information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kogi, K. Practical approaches to the assessment of work-related risks. Int. Arch Occup Environ Heath 65, S11–S14 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00381301

Download citation

Key words

  • Biological monitoring
  • Ethics
  • Participation
  • Risk assessment
  • Work-related risks