Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 409–414

Impression management, overclaiming, and perceived unethical conduct: The role of male and female managers

  • P. P. Schoderbek
  • Satish P. Deshpande
Article

Abstract

This study examines the impact of impression management and overclaiming on self-reported ethical conduct of 174 managers (67 male, 107 female) who worked for a large not-for-profit organization. As anticipated, impression management and overclaiming positively influenced perceived unethical conduct of managers. Female managers were more prone to impression management than male managers. There was no significant difference in perceived unethical conduct or level of overclaiming of male and female managers.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arlow, P. and T. A. Ulrich: 1980, ‘Business Ethics, Social Responsibility and Business Students: An Empiricial Comparison of Clark's Study’, Akron Business and Economic Review 11, 17–23.Google Scholar
  2. Brookhouse, J. K., R. M. Guion and M. E. Doherty: 1966, ‘Social Desirability Response Bias as One Source of the Discrepancy between Subjective Weights and Regression Weights’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 37, 316–328.Google Scholar
  3. Cortina, J. M.: 1993, ‘What is Coefficient Alpha? An Examination of Theory and Applications’, Journal of Applied Psychology 78(1), 98–104.Google Scholar
  4. Crandall, V.: 1966, ‘Personality Characteristics and Social Achievement Behaviors Associated with Children's Social Desirability Response Tendencies’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 4, 447–486.Google Scholar
  5. Dalton, D. R. and M. B. Metzgar: 1992, ‘Towards Candor, Cooperation, and Privacy in Applied Business Ethics Research: The Randomized Research Technique’, Business Ethics Quarterly 2(2), 207–221.Google Scholar
  6. Frederick, W. C., J. E. Post and K. Davis: 1992, Business and Society (McGraw Hill, Inc., New York).Google Scholar
  7. Fisher, R. J.: 1993, ‘Social Desirability Bias and the Validity of Indirect Questioning’, Journal of Consumer Research 20 (September), 303–315.Google Scholar
  8. Ganster, D. C., H. W. Hennessy and F. Luthans: 1983, ‘Social Desirability Response Effects: Three Alternative Models’, Academy of Management Journal 26(2), 321–331.Google Scholar
  9. Hollon, C. J. and T. A. Ulrich: 1979, ‘Personal Business Ethics: Managers vs Managers-To-Be’, Southern Business Review, 5, 17–22.Google Scholar
  10. Kohlberg, L.: 1981, The Philosophy of Moral Development (Harper & Row, New York).Google Scholar
  11. Lautenschlager, G. J. and V. L. Flaherty: 1990, ‘Computer Administration of Questions: More Desirable or More Social Desirability?’, Journal of Applied Psychology 75(3), 310–314.Google Scholar
  12. Linden, W., D. L. Paulhaus, and K. S. Dobson: 1986, ‘Effects of Response Styles on the Report of psychological and Somatic Distress’, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54(3), 309–313.Google Scholar
  13. McGuire, W. J.: 1968, ‘Personality and Susceptibility to Social influence’, in E. F. Borgatta and W. W. Lambert, ed., Handbook of Personality Theory and Research (Rand McNally, Chicago).Google Scholar
  14. Milham, J.: 1974, ‘Two Components of Need of Approval Score and their Relationship to Cheating Following Success and Failure’, Journal of Research in Personality 8, 378–392.Google Scholar
  15. Paulhus, D. L.: 1984, ‘Two-Component Models of Socially Desirable Responding’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 598–609.Google Scholar
  16. Peltier, D. B. and J. A. Walsh: 1990, ‘An Investigation of Response Bias in the Chapman Scales’, Educational and Psychological Measurement 50, 803–815.Google Scholar
  17. Peterson, R. A. and R. A. Kerin: 1981, ‘The Quality of Self-Report Data: Review and Synthesis’, in B. M. Enis and K. J. Roering eds, Review of Marketing (American Marketing Association, Chicago), 5–20.Google Scholar
  18. Phillips, D. L. and K. J. Clancy: 1972, ‘Some Effects of “Social Desirability” in Survey Studies’, American Journal of Sociology, 77(5), 921–941.Google Scholar
  19. Randall, D. M. and A. M. Gibson: 1990, ‘Methodology in Business Ethics Research: A Review and Critical Assessment’, Journal of Business Ethics 9(6), 457–472.Google Scholar
  20. Randall, D. M. and M. F. Fernandes: 1991, ‘The Social Desirability Response Bias in Ethics Research’, Journal of Business Ethics 10, 805–817.Google Scholar
  21. Robertson, D. C.: 1993, ‘Empiricism in Business Ethics: Suggested Research Directions’, Journal of Business Ethics 12, 585–599.Google Scholar
  22. Robinette, R. L.: 1991, ‘The Relationship Between the Marlowe-Crowne Form C and the Validity Scales of the MMPI’, Journal of Clinical Psychology 47 (May), 396–399.Google Scholar
  23. Stevens, G. E.: 1984, ‘Business Ethics and Social Responsibility: The Response of Present and Future Managers’, Akron Business and Economic Review (fall), 6–11.Google Scholar
  24. Tyson, T.: 1990, ‘Believing that Everyone Else is Less Ethical: Implications for Work Behavior and Ethics Instruction’, Journal of Business Ethics 9, 715–721.Google Scholar
  25. Zerbe, W. J. and D. L. Paulhus: 1987, ‘Socially Desirable Responding in Organizational Behavior: A Reconception’, Academy of Management Review 12(2), 250–264.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. P. Schoderbek
    • 1
  • Satish P. Deshpande
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Management, Haworth College of BusinessWestern Michigan UniversityKaiamzooU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations