, Volume 80, Issue 4, pp 490–497

Seed dispersal by ants: behaviour-releasing compounds in elaiosomes

  • Christine R. Brew
  • Dennis J. O'Dowd
  • Ian D. Rae
Original Papers


In a study of the biochemical basis of seed dispersal by ants, elaiosomes of Acacia myrtifolia and Tetratheca stenocarpa induced seed collection: intact diaspores and elaiosomes were taken rapidly by ants while most seeds remained on the forest floor. Extracts of elaiosomes (non-polar lipids, polar lipids, and aqueous fractions) were differentially collected by ants. Small pieces of pith impregnated with the polar lipid fraction from elaiosomes of either species elicited a removal rate by ants equivalent to that of intact elaiosomes and significantly higher than that of untreated pith. The non-polar lipid fraction, highest in concentration in elaiosomes of both species, elicited removal that did not differ from that of untreated pith. In T. stenocarpa, however, the aqueous fraction also induced removal equivalent to the polar lipid fraction. 1,2-Diglycerides with unsaturated groups are present in the active polar fractions of both species and unsaturated oleate is the major acid group of the glycerides in elaiosomes. Most oleate-containing compounds tested were taken more rapidly by ants than saturated compounds, and oleic acid, associated with corpse-carrying in ants, induced rapid removal. 1,2-Diolein, but not 1,3-diolein, was taken suggesting that the specific configuration of fatty acid moieties influences collection by ants. We hypothesize that a small suite of oleyl-containing compounds in elaiosomes elicit a stereotyped carrying response by a variety of ants. While the nutrient composition of elaiosomes may provide the underlying selective advantage for ants in seed dispersal, specific compounds may manipulate their behaviour and maximize seed dispersal.

Key words

Ants Elaiosome Lipids Mutualism Seed dispersal 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Beattie AJ (1983) Distribution of ant-dispersed plants. Sonderbände des Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins in Hamburg 71:421–427Google Scholar
  2. Beattie AJ (1985) The evolutionary ecology of ant-plant mutualisms. Cambridge, Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  3. Beattie AJ, Culver DC (1980) The guild of myrmecochores in the herbaceous flora of West Virginia forests. Ecology 62:107–115Google Scholar
  4. Berg RY (1975) Myrmecochorous plants in Australia and their dispersal by ants. Aust J Bot 23:475–508Google Scholar
  5. Bond WJ, Slingsby P (1982) Seed dispersal by ants in shrublands of the Cape Province and its evolutionary implications. South Afr J Sci 79:231–233Google Scholar
  6. Bresinsky A (1963) Bau, Entwicklungsgeschichte und Inhaltsstoffe der Elaiosomen. Bibliotheca Bot 126:1–54Google Scholar
  7. Culver DC, Beattie AJ (1978) Myrmecochory in Viola: dynamics of seed-ant interactions in some West Virginia species. J Ecol 66:53–72Google Scholar
  8. Dadd RH (1973) Insect nutrition: current developments and metabolic implications. Annu Rev Entomol 18:381–429Google Scholar
  9. Dyke SF, Floyd AS, Sainsbury M, Theobald RS (1978) Organic spectroscopy An introduction, 2nd edn Longman, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Finch PD (1983) Do rates need standardizing for comparative purposes? Biometrics 39:274–279Google Scholar
  11. Gordon DM (1983) Dependence of necrophoric response to oleic acid on social context in the ant Pogonomyrmex badius. J Chem Ecol 9:105–111Google Scholar
  12. Handel SN (1978) The competitive relationship of three woodland sedges, and its bearing on the evolution of ant dispersal of Carex pedunculata. Evolution 32:151–163Google Scholar
  13. Hanzawa FM, Beattie AJ, Culver DC (1988) Directed dispersal: demographic analysis of an ant-seed mutualism. Am Nat 131:1–13Google Scholar
  14. Haskins CP, Haskins EF (1974) Notes on the necrophoric behavior in the archaic ant Myrmecia vindex (Formicidae: Myrmeciinae). Psyche 81:252–267Google Scholar
  15. Herrera C (1981) Are tropical fruits more rewarding to dispersers than temperate ones? Am Nat 118:896–907Google Scholar
  16. Kennedy EP (1961) Biosynthesis of complex lipids. Fed Proc Am Soc Exp Biol 20:934–940Google Scholar
  17. Lanza J (1988) Ant preferences for Passiflora nectar mimics that contain amino acids. Biotropica 20:341–344Google Scholar
  18. Lanza J, Krauss BR (1984) Detection of amino acids in artificial nectars by two tropical ants, Leptothorax and Monomorium. Oecologia (Berlin) 63:423–425Google Scholar
  19. Majer JD (1978) An improved pitfall trap for sampling ants and other epigaeic invertebrates. J. Aust Ent Soc 17:261–262Google Scholar
  20. Marshall DL, Beattie AJ, Bollenbacher WE (1979) Evidence for diglycerides as attractants in an ant-seed interaction. J Chem Ecol 5:335–344Google Scholar
  21. O'Dowd DJ, Gill AM (1986) Seed dispersal syndromes in Australian Acacia. In: Murray DR (ed) Seed dispersal. Academic Press, Australia, pp 87–121Google Scholar
  22. O'Dowd DJ, Hay ME (1980) Mutualism between harvester ants and a desert ephemeral: seed escape from rodents. Ecology 61:531–540Google Scholar
  23. Rice B, Westoby M (1981) Myrmecochory in sclerophyll vegetation of the West Head, New South Wales. Aust J Ecol 6:291–298Google Scholar
  24. Vinson SB, Thompson JL, Green HB (1967) Phagostimulants for the imported fire ant Solenopsis saevissima richerti. J Insect Physiol 13:1729–1736Google Scholar
  25. Welch RW (1977) A micro-method for the estimation of oil content and composition in seed crops. J Sci Food Agric 28:635–638Google Scholar
  26. Wilson EO, Durlack NI, Roth LM (1958) Chemical releasers of necrophoric behaviour in ants. Psyche 65:108–114Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christine R. Brew
    • 1
  • Dennis J. O'Dowd
    • 1
  • Ian D. Rae
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Botany and ZoologyMonash UniversityClaytonAustralia
  2. 2.Department of ChemistryMonash UniversityClaytonAustralia

Personalised recommendations