Oecologia

, Volume 76, Issue 2, pp 215–221 | Cite as

Differential survival of chaparral seedlings during the first summer drought after wildfire

  • J. M. Frazer
  • S. D. Davis
Original Papers

Summary

Big Pod Ceanothus (Ceanothus megacarpus) is an obligate seeder after fire; Laurel Sumac (Rhus laurina) is primarily a resprouter after fire. Both species commonly occur together in mixed stands and are dominant members of the coastal chaparral of southern California. We compared the mean survival of post-fire seedlings of each species during the first summer drought after fire and found C. megacarpus to have a mean survival of 54% while R. laurina had a mean survival of only 0.1%. Rooting dephs were similar between species but predawn water potentials and leaf temperatures were higher for R. laurina seedlings. Leaf temperatures for R. laurina reached a mean value of 46.8° C on hot, summer days, about 5° C higher than seedlings of C. megacarpus. By the end of the first growing season, 92% of all C. megacarpus seedlings had suffered herbivory compared to only 17% of all R. laurina seedlings. Herbivory did not appear to be the immediate cause of seedling mortality. Transect data indicated that full recovery of prefire species composition and density at our study site was likely but the mode of recovery was different for the species examined. R. laurina recovered primarily by sprouting, C. megacarpus totally by seedling establishment and a third species, Adenostoma fasciculatum (chamise), by a combination of sprouting and seedling establishment. We attribute the higher mortality of R. laurina seedlings to the greater sensitivity of its tissue to water stress. It may be that differential survival of shrub seedlings and differential modes of reestablishment after fire play an important role in maintaining species diversity in the chaparral communities of coastal, southern California.

Key words

Chaparral Seedling establishment Water stress Drought Fire 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Axelrod DI (1973) History of the mediterranean ecosystem in California. In: Castri di F, Mooney HA (eds) Mediterranean Type Ecosystems: Origin and Structure. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 225–277Google Scholar
  2. Axelrod DI (1977) Outline of California vegetation. In: Barbour MG, Major J (eds) Terrestrial Vegetation of California. John Wiley & Sons. New York, pp 139–193Google Scholar
  3. Barnes FJ (1979) Water relations of four species of Ceanothus. MS thesis. San Jose State Univ, CA.Google Scholar
  4. Bazzaz FA (1979) The physiological ecology of plant succession. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 10:351–371Google Scholar
  5. Biswell HH, Gilman JH (1961) Brush management in relation to fire and other environmental factors on the Tehama deer winter range. Calif Fish Game 47:357–389Google Scholar
  6. Carlquist S, Hoekman DA (1985) Ecological wood anatomy of the woody southern Californian flora. IAWA Bull 6:319–347Google Scholar
  7. Christensen NL, Muller CH (1975) Relative imprortance of factors controlling germination and seedling survival in Adenostoma chaparral. Am Midl Nat 93:71–78Google Scholar
  8. Comstock JP, Mahall BE (1985) Drought and changes in leaf orientation for two California chaparral shrubs: Ceanothus megacarpus and Ceanothus crassifolius. Oecologia (Berlin) 65:531–535Google Scholar
  9. DeSouza J, Silka PA, Davis SD (1986) Comparative physiology of burned and unburned Rhus laurina after chaparral wildfire. Oecologia (Berlin) 71:63–68Google Scholar
  10. Gibbens RP, Schultz AM (1963) Brush manipulation on a deer winter range. Calif Fish Game 49:95–118Google Scholar
  11. Grubb PJ (1977) The maintenance of species-richness in plant communities: the improtance of the regeneration niche. Biol Rev 52:107–145Google Scholar
  12. Hanes TL (1971) Succession after fire in the chaparral of southern California. Ecol Monogr 41:27–52Google Scholar
  13. Heusser L (1978) Pollen in Santa Barbara Basin, California: a 12,000-yr record. Geo Soc Am Bull 89:673–678Google Scholar
  14. Horton JS, Kraebel CJ (1955) Development of vegetation after fire in the chamise chaparral of southern California. Ecology 36:244–262Google Scholar
  15. Jacks PM (1984) The drought tolerance of Adenostoma fasciculatum and Ceanothus crassifolius seedlings and vegetation change in the San Gabriel chaparral. MS thesis, San Diego St Univ, San Diego CA, p 86Google Scholar
  16. Keeley JE (1986) Resilience of mediterranean scrub communities to fire. In: Dell B (ed) Resilience in Mediterranean Ecosystems. Dr. W. Junk, New York, pp 95–112Google Scholar
  17. Keeley JE, Keeley SC (1981) Post-fire regeneration of southern California chaparral. Am J Bot 68:524–530Google Scholar
  18. Keeley JE, Zedler PH (1978) Reproduction of chaparral shrubs after fire: a comparison of sprouting and seeding strategies. Am Midl Nat 99:142–161Google Scholar
  19. Kummerow J, Ellis BA, Mills JN (1985) Post-fire seedling establishment of Adenostoma fasciculatum and Ceanothus greggii in southern California chaparral. Madrono 32:148–157Google Scholar
  20. Miller PC, Poole DK (1979) Patterns of water use by shrubs in southern California. Forest Sci 25:84–98Google Scholar
  21. Mills JN (1983) Herbivory and seedling establishment in post-fire southern California chaparral. Oecologia (Berlin) 60:267–270Google Scholar
  22. Mooney HA, Parsons DJ (1973) Structure and function of the California chaparral — an example from San Dimas. In: Castri di F, Mooney HA (eds) Ecological Studies vol 7, Mediterranean Type Ecosystems. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 83–112Google Scholar
  23. Munz PA (1974) A flora of southern California. Univ Calif Press, Berkeley, CA, p 1086Google Scholar
  24. Musick HB (1972) Post-fire seedling ecology of two Ceanothus species in relation to slope exposure. MA thesis, Univ Calif Santa Barbara, p 22Google Scholar
  25. Poole DK, Miller PC (1975) Water relations of selected species of chaparral and coastal sage communities. Ecology 56:1118–1128Google Scholar
  26. Raven PH (1977) The California flora. In: Barbour MG, Major J (eds) Terrestrial Vegetation of California. John Wiley & Sons New York, pp 109–137Google Scholar
  27. Rundel PW (1981) Fire as an ecological factor. In: Lange OL, Nobel PS, Osmond CB, Ziegler H (eds) Plant Physiological Ecology I, Responses to the Physical Environment. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 501–538Google Scholar
  28. Sampson AW (1944) Plant succession on burned chaparral lands in Northern California. Univ Calif Agric Stn Bull No 685. p 144Google Scholar
  29. Schlesinger WH, Gill DS (1978) Demographic studies of the chaparral shrub, Ceanothus megacarpus, in the Santa Ynez Mountains, California. Ecology 59:1256–1263Google Scholar
  30. Schlesinger WH, Gray JT, Gill DS, Mahall BE (1982) Ceanothus megacarpus chaparral: a synthesis of ecosystem processes during development and annual growth. Bot Review 48:47–117Google Scholar
  31. Scholander PF, Hammel HT, Bradstreet ED, Hemmingsen EA (1965) Sap pressure in vascular plants. Science 148:339–346Google Scholar
  32. Schultz AM, Launchbaugh JL, Biswell HH (1955) Relationship between grass density and brush seedling survival. Ecology 36:226–238Google Scholar
  33. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry. WH Freeman & Co, San Francisco, p 859Google Scholar
  34. Vogl RJ, Schorr PK (1972) Fire and manzanita chaparral in the San Jacinto Mountains, California. Ecology 53:1179–1188Google Scholar
  35. Weibe HH, Brown RW, Barker J (1977) Temperature gradient effects on in situ hygrometer measurements of water potential. Agron J 69:933–939Google Scholar
  36. Weibe HH, Brown RW (1979) Temperature gradient effects on in situ hygrometer measurements of soil water. Agron J 71:397–401Google Scholar
  37. Wellington AB (1984) Leaf water potentials, fire and the regeneration of mallee eucalyptus in semi-arid, south-eastern Australia. Oecologia (Berlin) 64:360–362Google Scholar
  38. Wells PV (1969) The relation between mode of reproduction and extent of speciation in woody genera of the California chaparral. Evolution 23:264–267Google Scholar
  39. Zedler PH (1977) Life history attributes of plants and the fire cycle: a case study in chaparral dominated by Cupressus forbesii. In: Mooney HA, Conrad CE (eds) Proc Symp on the Environmental Consequences of Fire and Fuel Management in Mediterranean Ecosystems, USDA. For Ser Gen Tech Rep Wo-3. pp 451–458Google Scholar
  40. Zedler PH, Gautier CR, McMaster GS (1983) Vegetation change in response to extreme events: the effect of a short interval between fires in California chaparral and coastal scrub. Ecology 64:809–818Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. M. Frazer
    • 1
  • S. D. Davis
    • 1
  1. 1.Natural Science DivisionPepperdine UniversityMalibuUSA

Personalised recommendations