, Volume 70, Issue 4, pp 580–586 | Cite as

Ecophysiological studies on the shrub Vaccinium myrtillus L. taken from a wide altitudinal range

  • F. I. Woodward
Original Papers


Observations have been made on the gas exchange and morphology of Vaccinium myrtillus taken from altitudes of 200 m, 610 m and 1,100 m along an altitudinal gradient in central Scotland. Under saturating irradiance, optimum temperatures and a range of vapour pressure deficits, photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance increased with the altitude of origin of the populations. Correlated with these increases was an increase in the adaxial stomatal density with altitude. This response to altitude could be simulated in controlled conditions, by growing plants in a CO2 concentration below ambient, similar to that expected at altitude.

Plant height decreased with altitude, a feature which was maintained in cultivation. Stem rigidity declined with altitude, in a manner which is predicted to limit the reproductive capacity of the population from 1,100 m in high wind speeds.

Total leaf nitrogen increased with altitude. The nitrogen economy of the shoot is discussed in terms of nitrogen availability for stems and leaves and its control over maximum rates of photosynthesis, competitive ability and reproductive capacity.

Key words

Gas exchange Morphology Altitude CO2 effects Vaccinium 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barry RG (1981) Mountain weather and climate. Methuen & Co. Ltd., LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Billings WD, Clebsch EEC, Mooney HA (1961) Effect of low concentration of carbon-dioxide on photosynthesis rates of two races of Oxyria. Science 133:1834Google Scholar
  3. Butler P (1985) The ecology of dwarf shrub species from diverse altitudes and latitudes. PhD thesis. University of Cambridge, p 187Google Scholar
  4. Caemmerer S von, Farquhar GD (1981) Some relationships between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas exchange of leaves. Planta 153:376–387Google Scholar
  5. Clausen J, Keck DD, Hiesey WM (1940) Experimental studies on the nature of species. I. The effect of varied environments on western north American plants. Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication 520:1–452Google Scholar
  6. Cowan IR (1977) Stomatal behaviour and environment. Adv Bot Res 4:117–228Google Scholar
  7. Davies WJ, Gill K, Halliday G (1978) The influence of wind on the behaviour of stomata of photosynthetic stems of Cytisus scoparius (L.) Link. Ann Bot 42:1149–1154Google Scholar
  8. Easty AC, Young S (1976) A small scale dewpoint humidity measurer. J Phys E 9:106–110Google Scholar
  9. Farquhar GD, Sharkey TD (1982) Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis. Ann Rev Plant Physiol 33:317–345Google Scholar
  10. Gale J (1972) Availability of carbon dioxide for photosynthesis at high altitudes. Ecology 53:494–497Google Scholar
  11. Grace J (1977) Plant response to wind. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Grace J, Russell G (1977) The effect of wind on grasses. III. Influence of continuous drought or wind on anatomy and water relations in Festuca arundinacea Schreb. J Exp Bot 28:268–278Google Scholar
  13. Harbinson J, Woodward FI (1984) Field measurements of the gas exchange of woody plant species in simulated sunflecks. Ann Bot 53:841–851Google Scholar
  14. Hunt ER, Weber JA, Gates DM (1984) Differences between tree species in hydraulic press calibration of leaf water potential are correlated with specific leaf area. Plant Cell Env 7:597–600Google Scholar
  15. Jones HG (1983) Plants and microclimate. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  16. Körner Ch, Mayr R (1980) Stomatal behaviour in alpine plant communities between 600 and 2,600 metres above sea level. In: Grace J, Ford ED, Jarvis PG (eds) Plants and their atmospheric environment. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 205–218Google Scholar
  17. Körner Ch, Scheel JA, Bauer H (1979) Maximum leaf diffusive conductance in vascular plants. Photosynthetica 13:45–82PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Meteorological Office (1983) Monthly weather report, vol 100. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Mooney HA, Wright RD, Strain BR (1964) The gas exchange capacity of plants in relation to vegetation zonation in the White Mountains of California. Amer Midl Nat 72:281–297Google Scholar
  20. Mooney HA, Strain BR, West M (1966) Photosynthetic efficiency at reduced carbon dioxide tensions. Ecology 47:490–491Google Scholar
  21. Ryle GJA, Hesketh GD (1969) Carbon dioxide uptake in nitrogen deficient plants. Crop Sci 9:451–454Google Scholar
  22. Slatyer RO (1970) Comparative photosynthesis, growth and transpiration of two species of Atriplex. Planta 93:175–189Google Scholar
  23. Tranquillini W (1979) Physiological ecology of the Alpine timberline. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Turesson G (1925) The plant species in relation to habitat and climate. Hereditas 6:147–236Google Scholar
  25. Turesson G (1930) The selective effect of climate upon the plant species. Hereditas 14:99–152Google Scholar
  26. Wielgolaski FE, Kjelvik S, Kallio P (1975) Mineral content of tundra and forest tundra plants in Fennoscandia. In: Wielgolaski FE (ed) Fennoscandian Tundra Ecosystems. Part I. Plants and microorganisms. Springer, Berlin, pp 316–332Google Scholar
  27. Woodward FI (1975) The climatic control of the altitudinal distributions of Sedum rosea (L.) Scop. and S. telephium L. II. The analysis of plant growth in controlled environments. New Phytol 74:335–348Google Scholar
  28. Woodward FI (1979) The differential temperature responses of the growth of certain plant species from different altitudes. I. Growth analysis of Phleum alpinum L., P. bertolonii D.C., Sesleria albicans Kit. and Dactylis glomerata L. New Phytol 82:385–395Google Scholar
  29. Woodward FI (1983) The significance of interspecific differences in specific leaf area to the growth of selected herbaceous species from different altitudes. New Phytol 95:313–323Google Scholar
  30. Woodward FI, Pigott CD (1975) The climatic control of the altitudinal distributions of Sedum rosea (L.) Scop. and S. telephium L. I. Field observations. New Phytol 74:323–334.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. I. Woodward
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BotanyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations