, Volume 56, Issue 2–3, pp 306–312 | Cite as

Influences of prey density on fecundity in a mantis, Paratenodera angustipennis (S.)

  • Toshiaki Matsura
  • Kiyomi Morooka
Original Papers


To clarify the effects of prey density on fecundity in predatory insects, relationships between density of prey (adult flies of Phaenicia sericata) and number of eggs, preoviposition periods, and egg size were examined, using adult female mantids, Paratenodera angustipennis de Saussure. The results are summarized as follows. 1) The relationship between prey density and number of flies captured by a mantis per day was described by a Type II functional response curve. 2) The relationship between prey density and number of eggs could be expressed by a curve which rises at a decreasing rate towards an upper asymptote as the prey density increases. 3) The higher the prey density, the shorter was the preoviposition period. 4) The egg size was fixed irrespective of the prey density. 5) From the above results, we conclude that the mantids increase their fecundity by ovipositing large oothecae repeatedly at shorter intervals when prey density during their adult stage is higher. It was concluded that for a population of the mantids prey density during the adult stage is an important factor influencing its rate of increase.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson JF (1974) Responses to starvation in the spiders Lycosa lenta Hentz and Flistata hibernalis (Hentz). Ecology 55:576–585Google Scholar
  2. Barbosa P, Cranshaw, W., Greenblatt JA (1981) Influence of food quantity and quality on polymorphic dispersal behaviors in the gipsy moth, Lymantria dispar. Can J Zool 59:293–296Google Scholar
  3. Beddington, JR, Hassell MP, Lawton JH (1976) The components of arthropod predation. II. The predator rate of increase. J Anim Ecol 45:165–185Google Scholar
  4. Chant DA (1961) The effect of prey density on prey consumption and oviposition in adults of Typhlodromus (T) occidentalis Nesbitt (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) in the laboratory. Can J Zool 39:311–315Google Scholar
  5. Dixon AFG (1959) An experimental study of the searching behaviour of the predatory coccinellid beetle Adalia decempunctata (L.). J Anim Ecol 28:259–281Google Scholar
  6. Eisenberg RM, Hurd LE, Bartley JA (1981) Ecological consequences of food limitation for adult mantids (Tenodera aridifolia sinensis Saussure). Am Midl Nat 106:209–218Google Scholar
  7. Fox LR, Murdoch WW (1978) Effects of feeding history on shortterm and long-term functional responses in Notonecta hoffmanni. J Anim Ecol 47:945–959Google Scholar
  8. Fransz HG (1974) The functional response to prey density in an acarine system. PUDOC, Wageningen. NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  9. Hassell MP (1978) The dynamics of arthropod predator-prey systems. Princeton Univ. Press. PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  10. Haynes DL, Sisojevic P (1966) Predatory behavior of Philodromus rufus Walckenaer (Araneae: Thomisidae). Can Ent 98:113–133Google Scholar
  11. Holling CS (1959) Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism. Can Ent 91:385–398Google Scholar
  12. Holling CS (1966) The functional response of invertebrate predators to prey density. Mem Ent Soc Can 48:1–86Google Scholar
  13. Lawton JH (1971) Maximum and actual field feeding-rates in larvae of the damselfly Pyrrhosoma nymphula (Sulzer) (Odonata: Zygoptera). Freshwat Biol 1:99–111Google Scholar
  14. Matsura T (1981) Responses to starvation in a mantis, Paratenodera angustipennis (S.). Oecologia (Berl) 50:291–295Google Scholar
  15. Matsura T, Inoue T, Hosomi Y (1975) Ecological studies of a mantid, Paratenodera angustipennis de Saussure I. Evaluation of the feeding condition in natural habitats. Res. Popul. Ecol. 17:64–76Google Scholar
  16. Miyashita K (1968) Quantitative feeding biology of Lycosa T-insignita Boes. et Str. (Araneae: Lycosidae). Bull Nat Inst Agr Sci C-22:329–344Google Scholar
  17. Mukerji MK, LeRoux EJ (1969) A quantitative study of food consumption and growth of Podisus maculiventris (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Can Ent 101:387–403Google Scholar
  18. Richman S (1958) The transformation of energy by Daphnia pulex. Ecol Monogr 28:273–291Google Scholar
  19. Royama T (1971) A comparative study of models for predation and parasitism. Res Popul Ecol Suppl No. 1:1–91Google Scholar
  20. Sandness JH, McMurty JA (1970) Functional response of three species of Phytoseiidae (Acarina) to prey density. Can Ent 102:692–704Google Scholar
  21. Schroeder L (1969) Population growth efficiencies of laboratory Hydra pseudoligactis Hyman populations. Ecology 50:81–86Google Scholar
  22. Solomon ME (1949) The natural control of animal populations. J Anim Ecol 18:1–35Google Scholar
  23. Suzuki Y, Kiritani K (1974) Reproduction of Lycosa pseudoannulata (Boesenberg et Strand) (Araneae: Lycosidae) under different feeding conditions. (in Japanese with English summary) Jap J appl Ent Zool 18:166–170Google Scholar
  24. Takafuji A, Chant DA (1976) Comparative studies of two species of predacious phytoseiid mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidae), with spacial reference to their responses to the density of their prey. Res Popul Ecol 17:255–310Google Scholar
  25. Turnbull AL (1962) Quantitative studies of the food of Linyphia triangularis clerck (Araneae: Linyphiidae). Can Ent 94:1233–1249Google Scholar
  26. Wise D (1975) Food limitation of the spider Linyphia marginata: Experimental field studies. Ecology 56:637–646Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Toshiaki Matsura
    • 1
  • Kiyomi Morooka
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyKyoto Kyoiku UniversityKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations