, Volume 76, Issue 1, pp 138–147 | Cite as

Behavioral evidence for host races in Rhagoletis pomonella flies

  • Ronald J. Prokopy
  • Scott R. Diehl
  • Sylvia S. Cooley
Original Papers


One of the most controversial putative cases of host race formation in insects is that of the apple maggot fly, Rhagoletis pomonella (Diptera: Tephritidae). A principal cause of the controversy is lack of relevant data. In laboratory and field enclosure experiments, we compared the host acceptance behavior of sympatric populations of flies originating from naturally infested hawthorn (the native host) and apple (an introduced host) in Amherst, Massachusetts or East Lansing, Michigan. In general, hawthorn fruit were accepted for ovipositional attempts nearly equally by apple and hawthorn origin females, whereas apples were accepted much more often by apple than hawthorn origin females. Similarly, males of apple and hawthorn origin exhibited about equal duration of residence on hawthorn fruits as sites at which to acquire potential mates, while males of apple origin tended to reside substantially longer than males of hawthorn origin on apples. Irrespective of fly origin, both sexes always responded more positively to hawthorn fruit than to apples. Because all flies assayed were naive (ruling out effects of prior host experience of adults) and because tests revealed no influence of pre-imaginal fruit exposure on pattern of host fruit acceptance by females, the combined evidence suggests the phenotypic differences we observed in host response pattern between hawthorn and apple origin flies may have an underlying genetic basis. Further tests showed that while larval progeny of flies of each origin survived better in naturally growing hawthorn fruit than in naturally growing apples, there was no differential effect of fly origin on larval survival ability in either host. We discuss our findings in relation to restriction in gene flow between sympatric populations of R. pomonella and in relation to current models of host shifts in insects.

Key words

Rhagoletis Host races Oviposition behavior Larval survival 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ali Niazee MT (1985) Opiine parasitoids of Rhagoletis pomonella and R. zephyria in the Willamette Valley, Oregon. Can Entomol 117:163–166Google Scholar
  2. Averill AL, Prokopy RJ (1987) Intraspecific competition in the tephritid fruit fly Rhagoletis pomonella. Ecology 68:878–886Google Scholar
  3. Bush GL (1966) Taxonomy, cytology and evolution of the genus Rhagoletis in North America. Bull Harvard Mus Comp Zool 134:431–562Google Scholar
  4. Bush GL (1974) The mechanism of sympatric host race formation in the true fruit flies. In: White MJD (ed) Genetic Mechanisms of Speciation in Insects. Australian and New Zealand Book Co., Sydney. pp 3–23Google Scholar
  5. Bush GL (1975a) Modes of animal speciation. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 6:339–364Google Scholar
  6. Bush GL (1975b) Sympatric speciation in phytophagous parasitic insects. In: Price PW (ed), Evolutionary Strategies of Parasitic Insects. Plenum Press, London, pp 187–206Google Scholar
  7. Bush GL, Diehl SR (1982) Hort shifts, genetic models of sympatric speciation, and the origin of parasitic insect species. In: Visser JH, Minks AK (eds) Proc. 5th Intern. Symp. Insect-Plant Relationships, PUDOC, Wageningen, Netherlands, pp 297–305Google Scholar
  8. Carle SA, Averill AL, Rule GS, Reissig WH, Roelofs WL (1987) Variation in host fruit volatiles attractive to apple maggot fly, Rhagoletis pomonella. J Chem Ecol 13:795–805Google Scholar
  9. Chapman PJ (1933) Viability of eggs and larvae of the apple maggot (Rhagoletis pomonella). Cornell Univ Tech Bull 206: p 19Google Scholar
  10. Diehl SR (1984) The role of host plant shifts in the ecology and speciation of Rhagoletis flies, Ph.D thesis, Univ Texas p 256Google Scholar
  11. Diehl SR, Bush GL (1984) An evolutionary and applied perspective of insect biotypes. Ann Rev Entomol 29:471–504Google Scholar
  12. Diehl SR, Prokopy RJ (1986) Host selection behavior differences between the fruit fly sibling species Rhagoletis pomonella and R. mendax. Ann Entomol Soc Am 79:266–271Google Scholar
  13. Diehl SR, Prokopy RJ, Henderson S (1986) The role of stimuli associated with branches and foliage in host selection by Rhagoletis pomonella. In: Cavalloro R (ed) Fruit Flies of Economic Importance, 84. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 191–196Google Scholar
  14. Fein BL, Reissig WH, Roelofs WL (1982) Identification of apple volatiles attractive to the apple maggot, Rhagoletis pomonella. J Chem Ecol 8:1473–1487Google Scholar
  15. Felsenstein J (1981) Skepticism toward Santa Rosalia, or why are there so few kinds of animals? Evolution 35:124–135Google Scholar
  16. Fisher RA (1954) Statistical Methods for Research Workers. 12th ed. Oliver and Boyd, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  17. Fitt GP (1986a) The influence of a shortage of hosts on the specificity of oviposition behavior in species of Dacus. Physiol Entomol 11:133–143Google Scholar
  18. Fitt GP (1986b) The roles of adult and larval specialization in limiting the occurrence of five species of Dacus in cultivated fruits. Oecologia 69:101–109Google Scholar
  19. Fox LR, Morrow PA (1981) Specialization: species property or local phenomenon? Science 211:887–893Google Scholar
  20. Futuyma DJ (1983) Selective factors in the evolution of host choice by phytophagous insects. In: Ahmad SA (ed) Herbivorous Insects: Host Seeking Behavior and Mechanisms. Academic Press, New York, pp 227–244Google Scholar
  21. Futuyma DJ, Mayer GC (1980) Non-allopatric speciation in animals. Syst Zool 29:254–271Google Scholar
  22. Futuyma DJ, Peterson SC (1985) Genetic variation in the sue of resources by insects. Ann Rev Entomol 30:217–238Google Scholar
  23. Futuyma DJ, Philippi TE (1987) Genetic variation and covariation in responses to host plants by Alsophila pometaria. Evolution 41:269–279Google Scholar
  24. Futuyma DJ, Cort RP, Van Noordwijk I (1984) Adaptation to host plants in the fall cankerworm (Alsophila pometaria) and its bearing on the evolution of host affiliation in phytophagous insects. Am Nat 123:287–296Google Scholar
  25. Girolami V, Strapazzon A, Crnjar R, Angioy AM, Pietra P, Stoffolano JG, Prokopy RJ (1986) Behavior and sensory physiology of Rhagoletis pomonella in relation to oviposition sitmulants and deterrents in fruit. In: Cavalloro R (ed) Fruit Flies of Economic Importance, 84. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 183–190Google Scholar
  26. Goodman LA (1964) Simultaneous confidence intervals for contrasts among multinomial populations. Ann Math Stat 35:716–725Google Scholar
  27. Grizzle JE, Starmer CF, Koch GG (1969) Analysis of categorical data by linear models. Biometrics 25:489–504Google Scholar
  28. Hall JA (1939) Further observations on the biology of the apple maggot (Rhagoletis pomonella). Ann Rept Entomol Soc Ontario 69:53–58Google Scholar
  29. Hall JA (1943) Notes on the dogwood fly, a race of Rhagoletis pomonella. Can Entomol 75:202–203Google Scholar
  30. Hare JD, Kennedy GC (1986) Genetic variation in plant-insect associations: survival of Leptinotarsa decemlineata populations on Solanum carolinense. Evolution 40:1031–1043Google Scholar
  31. Hoffmann AA (1985) Effects of experience on oviposition and attraction in Drosophila: comparing apples and oranges. Am Nat 126:41–51Google Scholar
  32. Jaenike J (1981) Criteria for ascertaining the existence of host races. Am Nat 117:830–834Google Scholar
  33. Jaenike J (1982) Environmental modification of oviposition behavior in Drosophila. Am Nat 119:784–802Google Scholar
  34. Jaenike J (1985a) Parasite pressure and the evolution of amanitin tolerance in Drosophila. Evolution 39:1295–1301Google Scholar
  35. Jaenike J (1985b) Genetic and environmental determinants of food preference in Drosophila tripunctata. Evolution 39:362–369Google Scholar
  36. Jaenike J (1986a) Genetic complexity of host-selection behavior in Drosophila. Proc Nat Acad Sci 83:2148–2151Google Scholar
  37. Jaenike J (1986b) Intraspecific variation for resource use in Drosophila. Biol J Linn Soc 27:47–56Google Scholar
  38. Jaenike J, Grimaldi D (1983) Genetic variation for host preference within and among populations of Drosophila tripunctata. Evolution 37:1023–1033Google Scholar
  39. Jeffries MJ, Lawton JH (1984) Enemy free space and the structure of ecological communities. Biol J Linn Soc 23:269–286Google Scholar
  40. Jorgensen CD, Allred DB, Westcott RL (1986) Apple maggot adaptation for cherries in Utah. Great Basin Nat 46:173–174Google Scholar
  41. Koch GG, Amara IA, Davis GW, Gillings DB (1982) A review of some statistical methods for covariance analysis of categorical data. Biometrics 38:563–595Google Scholar
  42. Kondrashov AS, Mina MV (1986) Sympatric speciation: when is it possible? Biol J Linn Soc 27:201–223Google Scholar
  43. Maxwell CW, Parsons EC (1968) The recapture of marked apple maggot adults in several orchards from one release point. J Ecol Entomol 61:1157–1159Google Scholar
  44. Mayr E (1970) Populations, Species, and Evolution. Harvard Univ Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  45. Miller JR, Strickler KL (1984) Finding and accepting host plants. In: Bell WJ, Carde RT (eds) Chemical Ecology of Insects. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 127–157Google Scholar
  46. Moericke V, Prokopy RJ, Berlocher S, Bush GL (1975) Visual stimuli eliciting attraction of Rhagoletis pomonella flies to trees. Entomol Exp Appl 18:497–507Google Scholar
  47. Opp SB, Prokopy RJ (1986) Variation in laboratory oviposition by Rhagoletis pomonella in relation to mating status. Ann Entomol Soc Am 79:705–710Google Scholar
  48. Owens ED, Prokopy RJ (1986) Relationship between reflectance spectra of host plant surfaces and visual detection of host fruit by Rhagoletis pomonella flies. Physiol Entomol 11:297–307Google Scholar
  49. Papaj DR (1986) Shifts in foraging behavior by a Battus philenor population: field evidence for switching by individual butterflies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 19:31–39Google Scholar
  50. Papaj DR, Prokopy RJ (1986) Phytochemical basis of learning in Rhagoletis pomonella and other herbivorous insects. J Chem Ecol 12:1125–1143Google Scholar
  51. Papaj DR, Rausher MD (1983) Individual variation in host location by phytophagous insects. In: Ahmad S (ed) Herbivorous Insects: Host Seeking Behavior and Mechanisms. Academic Press, New York, pp 77–124Google Scholar
  52. Paterson HEH (1981) The continuing search for the unknown and unknowable: a critique of contemporary ideas on speciation. South African J Sci 77:113–119Google Scholar
  53. Pickett AD (1937) Studies on the genus Rhagoletis with special reference to Rhagoletis pomonella. Canad J Res 15:53–75Google Scholar
  54. Pickett AD, Neary ME (1940) Further studies on Rhagoletis pomonella. Scient Agric 20:551–556Google Scholar
  55. Pree DJ (1977) Resistance to development of larvae of the apple maggot in crab apples. J Econ Entomol 70:611–614Google Scholar
  56. Prokopy RJ (1966) Artificial oviposition devices for apple maggot. J Econ Entomol 59:231–232Google Scholar
  57. Prokopy RJ (1968) Visual responses of apple maggot flies, Rhagoletis pomonella: orchard studies. Entomol Exp Appl 11:403–422Google Scholar
  58. Prokopy RJ (1972) Evidence for a marking pheromone deterring repeated oviposition in apple maggot flies. Environ Entomol 1:326–332Google Scholar
  59. Prokopy RJ (1977) Attraction of Rhagoletis flies to red spheres of different sizes. Canad Entomol 109:593–596Google Scholar
  60. Prokopy RJ (1981) Oviposition-deterring pheromone system of apple maggot flies. In: Mitchell ER (ed) Management of Insect Pests with Semiochemicals. Plenum Publ Co, New York, pp 477–494Google Scholar
  61. Prokopy RJ, Berlocher SH (1980) Establishment of Rhagoletis pomonella on rose hips in southern New England. Canad Entomol 51:1319–1320Google Scholar
  62. Prokopy RJ, Bush GL (1972) Apple maggot infestation of pear. J Econ Entomol 65:597Google Scholar
  63. Prokopy RJ, Bush GL (1973) Ovipositional responses to different sizes of artificial fruit by flies of Rhagoletis pomonella species group. Ann Entomol Soc Am 66:927–929Google Scholar
  64. Prokopy RJ, Bennett EW, Bush GL (1971) Mating behavior in Rhagoletis pomonella. I. Site of assembly. Canad Entomol 103:1405–1409Google Scholar
  65. Prokopy RJ, Moericke V, Bush GL (1973). Attraction of apple maggot flies to odor of apples. Envir Entomol 2:743–749Google Scholar
  66. Prokopy RJ, Averill AL, Cooley SS, Roitberg CA, Kallet C (1982a) Variation in host acceptance pattern in apple maggot flies. In: Visser JH, Minks AK (eds) Proc. 5th Intern. Symp. Insect-Plant Relationships, PUDOC, Wageningen, Netherlands, pp 123–129Google Scholar
  67. Prokopy RJ, Averill AL, Cooley SS, Roitberg CA (1982b) Associative learning in egglaying site selection by apple maggot flies. Science 218:76–77Google Scholar
  68. Prokopy RJ, Kallet C, Cooley SS (1985) Fruit acceptance pattern of Rhagoletis pomonella flies from different geographic regions. Ann Entomol Soc Am 78:799–803Google Scholar
  69. Prokopy RJ, Papaj DR, Cooley SS, Kallet C (1986) On the nature of learning in oviposition site acceptance by apple maggot flies. Anim Behav 34:98–107Google Scholar
  70. Prokopy RJ, Aluja M, Green TA (1987) Dynamics of host odor and visual stimulus interaction in host finding behavior of apple maggot flies. In: Labeyrie V, Fabres G, Lachaise D (eds) Insects-Plants, Junk, Netherlands, pp 161–166Google Scholar
  71. Rausher MD (1978) Search image for leaf shape in a butterfly. Science 200:1071–1073Google Scholar
  72. Rausher MD (1984) The evolution of habitat preference in subdivided populations. Evolution 38:596–608Google Scholar
  73. Reissig WH (1979) Survival of apple maggot larvae, Rhagoletis pomonella, in picked and unpicked apples. Canad Entomol 111:181–187Google Scholar
  74. Reissig WH, Smith DC (1978) Bionomics of Rhagoletis pomonella in Crataegus. Ann Ent Soc Am 71:155–159Google Scholar
  75. Rice WR (1984) Disruptive selection on habitat preference and the evolution of reproductive isolation: a simulation study. Evolution 38:1251–1260Google Scholar
  76. Robert P (1985) A comparative study of some aspects of the reproduction of three Caryedon serratus strains in presence of its potential host plants. Oecologia 65:425–430Google Scholar
  77. Roitberg BD, Cairl RS, Prokopy RJ (1985) Oviposition deterring pheromone influences dispersal distance in tephritid fruit flies. Entomol Exp Appl 35:217–220Google Scholar
  78. Roitberg BD, Van Lenteren JC, Van Alphen JJM, Galis F, Prokopy RJ (1982) Foraging behavior of Rhagoletis pomonella, a parasite of hawthorn (Crataegus), in nature. J Anim Ecol 51:307–325Google Scholar
  79. SAS Institute (1985) SAS user's guide: statistics: version 5. SAS Institute, Cary, N.C.Google Scholar
  80. Shervis LJ, Boush GM, Koval CF (1970) Infestation of sour cherrics by the apple maggot: confirmation of a previously uncertain host status. J Econ Entomol 63:294–295Google Scholar
  81. Smith DC, Prokopy RJ (1980) Mating behavior of Rhagoletis pomonella. VI. Site of early-season encounters. Canad Entomol 112:585–590Google Scholar
  82. Stanek EJ III, Dichl SR, Dgetluck M, Stokes ME, Prokopy RJ (1987) Statistical methods for analyzing discrete responses of insects tested repeatedly. Environ Entomol 16:319–326Google Scholar
  83. Stanton ML (1984) Short-term learning and the searching accuracy of egglaying butterflies. Anim Behav 32:33–40Google Scholar
  84. Tabashnik BE, Wheelock H, Rainbolt JD, Watt WB (1981) Individual variation in oviposition preference in the butterfly, Colias eurytheme. Oecologia 50:225–230Google Scholar
  85. Traynier RMM (1986) Visual learning in assays of sinigrin solution as an oviposition releaser for the cabbage butterfly, Pieris rapae. Entomol Exp Appl 40:25–33Google Scholar
  86. Van den Water TPM (1983) A host race of the small ermine moth Yponomeuta padellus in Northern Europe. Netherlands J Zool 33:276–282Google Scholar
  87. Vet LEM, Van Opzeeland K (1984) The influence of conditioning of olfactory microhabitat and host location in Asobara tabida and A. rufescens larval parasitoids of Drosophilidae. Oecologia 63:171–177Google Scholar
  88. Via S (1986) Genetic covariance between oviposition preference and larval performance in an insect herbivore. Evolution 40:778–785Google Scholar
  89. Walsh BD (1867) The apple worm and the apple maggot. J Hort 2:338–343Google Scholar
  90. Wasserman SS (1986) Genetic variation in adaptation to foodplants among populations of the southern cowpea weevil Callosobruchus maculatus: evolution of oviposition preference. Entomol Exp Appl 42:201–212Google Scholar
  91. Wasserman SS, Futuyma DJ (1981) Evolution of host plant utilization in laboratory populations of the southern cowpea weevil, Callosobruchus maculatus. Evolution 35:605–617Google Scholar
  92. Wood TK, Guttman SI (1982) Ecological and behavioral basis for reproductive isolation in the sympatric Enchenopa binota complex. Evolution 36:233–242Google Scholar
  93. Zwölfer H (1975) Arbildung und ökologische Differenzierung bei phytophagen Insekten. Verk Deutschen Zool Gesell 67:394–401Google Scholar
  94. Zwölfer H, Bush GL (1984) Sympatrische and parapatrische Artbildung. Z Zool Syst Evol Forsch 22:211–233Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ronald J. Prokopy
    • 1
  • Scott R. Diehl
    • 2
  • Sylvia S. Cooley
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EntomologyUniversity of MassachusettsAmherstUSA
  2. 2.Department of Human GeneticsUniversity of Michigan Medical SchoolAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations