To explore the mechanical determinants of feeding strategies for nectar feeders, we develop a fluid dynamical and behavioral model describing the mechanics and energetics of capillary feeding in hummingbirds. Behavioral and morphological data for Calypte and Archilochus are used to test and illustrate this model. We emphasize the important differences between capillary and suction mechanisms of fluid feeding. Model predictions of nectar intake rates and nectar volumes per lick are consistent with observed values for Calypte anna. The optimal nectar concentration maximizing rate of energy intake depends on tongue morphology and licking behavior. For hummingbirds exhibiting optimal licking behavior, the optimal nectar concentration is 35–40% sucrose for feeding on large nectar volumes. For small nectar volumes, the optimal concentration is 20–25%. The model also identifies certain tongue morphologies and licking frequencies maximizing energy intake, that are consistent with available observations on licking behavior and tongue design in nectar feeding birds. These predictions differ qualitatively from previous results for suction feeding in butterflies.
The model predicts that there is a critical food canal radius above which suction feeding is superior to capillary feeding in maximizing the rate of energy intake; the tongues of most hummingbirds and sunbirds fall above this critical radius. The development of suction feeding by nectarivorous birds may be constrained by the elastic properties of their flexible tongues. Our results show that, in terms of morphology, scaling, and energetics, different mechanisms of feeding on the same food resource can lead to qualitatively different predictions about optimal design and feeding strategies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Adamson A (1963) Physical Chemistry of Surfaces. John Wiley and Sons, New York
Baker HG (1975) Sugar concentration in nectars from hummingbird flowers. Biotropica 7:37–41
Baker HG (1978) Chemical aspects of the pollination biology of woody plants in the tropics. In Tropical Trees as Living Systems. Cambridge U. Press, Cambridge, pp 57–82
Baker I, Baker HG (1982) Some constituents of floral nectars of Erythrina in relation to pollinators and systemtics. Allertonia 4:25–37
Bird RB, Stewart WE, Lightfoot EN (1960) Transport Phenomena. John Wiley and Sons, New York
Bolten AB, Feinsinger P (1978) Why do hummingbird flowers secrete dilute nectars? Biotropica 10:307–310
Calder WA (1979) On the temperature-dependency of optimal nectar concentrations for birds. J Theor Biol 78:185–196
Charnov EL (1976) Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. Theor Pop Biol 9:129–136
Crisp JD (1972) Properties of tendon and skin. In: Biomechanics: Its Foundations and Objectives. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, pp 141–179
Daniel TL, Kingsolver JG (in press) Feeding strategy and the mechanics of blood sucking in insects. J Theor Biol
Davies JT, Rideal EK (1979) Interfacial Phenomena. Academic Press, New York
Ewald PW, Williams WA (1982) Function of the bill and tongue in nectar uptake by hummingbirds. Auk 99:573–576
Feinsinger P, Wolfe JA, Swarm LA (1982) Island ecology: reduced hummingbird diversity and the pollination biology of plants, Trinidad and Tobago, West Indies. Ecology 63:494–506
Hainsworth FR (1973) On the tongue of a hummingbird: its role in the rate and energetics of feeding. Comp Biochem Physiol 46:65–78
Hainsworth FR, Wolf LL (1976) Nectar characteristics and food selection by hummingbirds. Oecologia (Berlin) 25:101–113
Heyneman A (1983) Optimal sugar concentrations of floral nectars-dependence on nectar energy flux and pollinator foraging costs. Oecologia (Berlin) 60:198–213
Kingsolver JG, Daniel TL (1979) On the mechanics and energetics of nectar feeding in butterflies. J Theor Biol 76:167–179
Kresch E, Noordergraaf A (1972) Cross-sectional shape of collapsible tubes. Biophysical Journal 12:274–294
Pyke GH, Pulliam HR, Charnov EL (1977) Optimal foraging: a selective review of theory and tests. Quart Rev Biol 52:137–154
Pyke GH, Waser NM (1981) The production of dilute nectars by hummingbird and honeyeater flowers. Biotropica 13:260–270
Schlamowitz RF, Hainsworth FR, Wolf LL (1976) On the tongues of sunbirds. Condor 78:104–107
Schoener TW (1971) Theory of feeding strategies. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 2:369–404
Snodgrass RF (1954) Principles of Insect Morphology. McGraw-Hill, New York
Stokes RH, Mills R (1965) Viscosity of Electrolytes and Related Properties. Pergammon Press, Oxford
Sutherland S (in prep) Nectar concentration in hummingbird flowers: maximizing the instantaneous rate of energy intake
Vogel S (1981) Life in Moving Fluids. Willard Grant Press, Boston
Wainwright SA, Biggs WD, Currey JD, Gosline JM (1976) Mechanical Design in Organisms. Halsted Press, New York
Weymouth R, Lasiewski R, Berger A (1964) The tongue apparatus in hummingbirds. Acta Anat 58:252–270
About this article
Cite this article
Kingsolver, J.G., Daniel, T.L. Mechanical determinants of nectar feeding strategy in hummingbirds: energetics, tongue morphology, and licking behavior. Oecologia 60, 214–226 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379523
- Nectar Volume
- Food Canal
- Feeding Bird
- Suction Feeding
- Nectar Feeding