Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 68, Issue 1, pp 69–72 | Cite as

Web spider's dilemma: a risky move or site dependent growth

  • Fritz Vollrath
Original Papers

Summary

Nephila clavipes inhabiting adjacent habitats showed differences in rate and ratio of growth. Spiders inside the forest fed less, grew slower and stayed smaller than those at the forest edge, a richer environment. The mortality rate in this habitat was about 1% per day, the mortality of vagrant males was even higher. Experimentally fed spiders did not shift their webs readily, even starving individuals stayed much longer than expected. The spiders avoided frequent moves and in a poor site grew more slowly and in smaller size increments. It seems that the costs of small adult size are less than the risks of active foraging.

Keywords

Mortality Rate Forest Edge Frequent Move Adult Size Active Forage 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Christenson TE, Goist KC (1979) Costs and benefits of male-male competition in the orb-weaving spider Nephila clavipes. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology 5:87–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Horn HS (1978) Optimal tactics of reproduction and life-history. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural Ecology. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  3. Jocque R (1981) On reduced size in spiders from marginal habitats. Oecologia (Berlin) 49:404–408Google Scholar
  4. Levi HW (1980) The orb-weaver genus Mecynogea, the subfamily Metinae and the genera Pachygnatha, Glenognatha and Azilia of the subfamily Tetragnathinae north of Mexico. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 149:1–75Google Scholar
  5. Lubin YD (1983) Nephila clavipes. In: Janzen D (ed) Costa Rica. University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
  6. Olive CW (1981) Optimal Phenology and body-size of orb-weaving spiders: foraging constraints. Oecologia (Berlin) 49:83–87PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Pianka ER (1981) Resource acquisition and allocation among animals. In: Townsend CR, Calow P (eds) Physiological Ecology. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  8. Pyke GH, Pulliam HR, Charnov EL (1977) Optimal foraging: a selective review of theory and tests. Quarterly Review of Biology 52:137–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Robinson MH, Mirick H (1971) The predatory behaviour of the golden web spider Nephila clavipes. Psyche 149:123–139Google Scholar
  10. Schoener TW (1971) Theory of feeding strategies. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 2:369–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Southwood TRE (1976) Bionomic strategies and population parameters. In: May RM (ed) Theoretical ecology: Principles and applications. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  12. Stearns SC (1976) Life-history tactics: a review of the ideas. Quarterly Review of Biology 51:3–47CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Tanaka K, Ito Y (1982) Decrease in respiratory rate in a wolf spider, Pardosa astigera (Koch), under starvation. Research in Population Ecology 24:360–374Google Scholar
  14. Turnbull AL (1964) The search for prey by a web-building spider: Achearanea tepidariorum (Araneae, Theridiidae). Can Entomol 96:568–579Google Scholar
  15. Vollrath F (1980) Male body size and fitness in the web-building spider Nephila clavipes. Z Tierpsych 53:61–78Google Scholar
  16. Vollrath F (1983) Relative and absolute growth in Nephila clavipes. In: Kraus O (ed) Taxonomy, Biology and Ecology of the Araneae. Naturwiss Verein Hamburg 26:277–289Google Scholar
  17. Wise DH (1975) Food limitation of the spider Linyphia marginata: experimental field studies. Ecology 56:637–646Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fritz Vollrath
    • 1
  1. 1.Smithsonian Tropical Research InstitutePanama

Personalised recommendations