Measuring method for vibration perception threshold of fingers and its application to vibration exposed workers

  • S. Aatola
  • M. Färkkilä
  • I. Pyykkö
  • O. Korhonen
  • J. Starck
Article
Received:
Accepted:

Summary

A measuring method for the vibration perception threshold (VPT) of fingers has been developed. The VPTs of 118 and 149 professional forest workers were measured during a compulsory annual health examination in 1979 and 1983, respectively. Also the VPTs of eight pedestal grinders, who were suffering vibration-induced white finger (VWF), were measured in 1979 and 1983. The control group consisted of 20 research workers who had no vibration exposure in the past and no symptoms in their hands. The measuring system for VPT gave repeatable results. The frequency of the most sensitive VPT of vibration exposed workers alternated between 63 and 125 Hz instead of 125 Hz of subjects without vibration exposure. The VPT of the pedestal grinders and forest workers with decreased hand grip force and with vibration-induced white finger were significantly higher than those of the controls. The VPTs of the forest workers decreased slightly and that of the grinders increased from 1979 to 1983. In spite of long vibration exposure in the past and continuing lower level vibration exposure, the increased VPT of forest workers does not seem to be permanent.

Key words

Hand-arm vibration Muscle fatique Numbness Vibration-induced white finger Vibration perception threshold 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Aatola S, Farkkila M, Korhonen O, Pyykkö I, Starck J (1985) Vibration detection threshold of lumberjacks. Fourth Int Symp Hand-Arm Vibration, May 6–8, 1985, Helsinki. Abstracts, Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, p 63Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aatola S, Starck J, Pyykkö I, Färkkilä M, Korhonen O (1986) Vibration detection threshold of lumberjacks. Second Joint Finnish-GDR Symp on Load and Strain of Central Regulation Processes, 3–4 June 1986, Helsinki, Finland, Extended Abstracts, Institute of Occupational Health, Finland, pp 156–160Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brammer AJ, Taylor W, Piercy JE (1986) Assessing the severity of the neurological component of the hand-arm vibration syndrome. Scand J Work Environ Health 12:428–431Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dyck PJ et al (1978) Introduction of automated systems to evaluate touch-pressure, vibration, and thermal sensation in man. Ann Neurol 4:502–510Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gescheider GA, O'Malley MJ, Verrillo RT (1983) Vibrotactile forward masking: evidence for channel independence. J Acoust Soc Am 74:474–485Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gescheider GA, Sklar BF, Van Doren CL, Verrillo RT (1985) Vibratactile forward masking: psychophysical evidence for a triplex theory of cutaneous mechanoreception. J Acoust Soc Am 78 (2):534–543Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Goldberg JM, Lindblom U (1979) Standardised method of determining vibratory perception thresholds for diagnosis and screening in neurological investigation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 42:793–803Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Harada N, Matsumoto T (1982) Various function tests on the upper extremities and the vibration syndrome. In: Brammer AJ, Taylor W (eds) Vibration effects on the hand and arm in industry. John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp 71–76Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hayward RA, Griffin MJ (1986) Measures of vibrotactile sensitivity in persons exposed to hand-arm vibration. Scand J Work Environ Health 12:423–427Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hämäläinen H (1982) Tactile and vibrotactile sensibility of the human hand. University of HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    International Organization for Standardization (1986) Mechanical vibration — guidelines for the measurement and the assessment of human exposure to hand-transmitted vibration. Geneva (ISO 5349)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Johansson RS, Lundström U, Lundström R (1982) Responses of mechanoreceptive afferent units in the glaborous skin in the human hand to sinusoidal skin displacement. Brain Res 244:17–25Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kakosy T, Szepesi L (1973) Effects of vibration exposure on the localization of Raynaud's phenomenon in chain saw operators. Work Environ Health 10:134–139Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lamore PJJ, Muijser H, Keemink CJ (1986) Envelope detection of amplitude-modulated high-frequency sinusoidal signals by skin mechanoreceptors. J Acoust Soc Am 79:1082–1085Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lindström I-M, Hagelthorn G, Bjerker N (1982) Vibration perception in persons not previously exposed to local vibration and in vibration-exposed to local vibration and in vibration-exposed workers. In: Brammer AJ, Taylor W (eds) Vibration effects on the hand and arm in industry. John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp 59–65Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lucas E (1970) Lesion of the peripheral nervous system due to vibration. Scand J Work Environ Health 7:67–79Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lundström R (1985) Effects of local vibration transmitted from ultrasonic devices on vibrotactile perception in the hands of therapists. Ergonomics 28:793–803Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lundström R (1986) Responses of mechanoreceptive afferent units in the glaborous skin of the human hand to vibration. Scand J Work Environ Health 12:413–416Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lundström R, Lindmark A (1982) Effects of local vibration on tactile perception in the hands of dentists. J Low Frequency Noise Vibration 1:1–11Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pelmear PL, Taylor W, Pearson JCG (1975) Clinical objective tests for vibration white finger. In: Taylor W, Pelmear PL (eds) Vibration white finger in industry. Academic Press, London, pp 53–81Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Piercy JE, Brammer AJ, Taylor W (1986) Physiological noise and its influence on vibrotactile perception thresholds. Scand J Work Environ Health 12:417–419Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pyykkö I, Korhonen O, Färkkilä M, Starck J, Aatola S (1982) A longitudinal study of the vibration syndrome in Finnish forestry workers. In: Brammer AJ, Taylor W (eds) Vibration effects on the hand and arm in industry. Wiley & Sons, New York, pp 157–168Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Saarnio H, Häkkinen V, Ignatius J (1979) Automatic measurement of vibratory sensitivity. In: Juvonen A, Tarvainen M (eds) Proc Third National Meeting on Biophysics and Medical Engineering in Finland, Lappeenranta, pp All/1-3Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Seppäläinen AM, Starck J, Härkönen H (1986) High-frequency vibration and sensory nerves. Scand J Work Environ Health 12:420–422Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Starck J, Färkkilä M, Aatola S, Pyykkö I, Korhonen O (1983) Vibration syndrome and vibraton in pedestal grinding. Br J Ind Med 40:426–433Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Starck J (1984) High impulse acceleration levels in hand-held vibratory tools: an additional factor in hazards associated with the hand-arm vibration syndrome. Scand J Work Environ Health 10:171–178Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tadashi N, Kojima Y, Kaji H, Saito K (1986) Diagnostic method for vibration syndrome with social reference to finger skin temperature and vibratory sense threshold. Scand J Work Environ Health 12:251–253Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Verrillo RT, Bolanowski Jr, SJ (1986) The effects of skin temperature on the psychophysical responses to vibraton on glabrous and hairy skin. J Acoust Soc Am 80:528–532Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Aatola
    • 1
  • M. Färkkilä
    • 2
  • I. Pyykkö
    • 2
  • O. Korhonen
    • 3
  • J. Starck
    • 3
  1. 1.Technical Research Centre of FinlandEspooFinland
  2. 2.University Hospital of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
  3. 3.Institute of Occupational HealthHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations