Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Responses of cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) to progressive soil drought

  • 62 Accesses

  • 16 Citations

Summary

Greenhouse-grown cowpeas, Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp., were subjected either to well-watered or to progressive soil drought conditions between 10–40 days after emergence. Stomatal closure was found to correlate with the progressive drying of soil while leaf water potentials were not very different from the well-watered plants. Reduction in leaf turgor resulted in a reduced rate of leaf extension but increased that of root. Stomatal conductance and transpiration rates of soil-drought plants were similar to well-watered plants in the morning, but were greatly reduced in the afternoon till evening. It is suggested that the maintenance of transpiration rates per unit leaf area of soil-drought cowpeas in the morning is due to the reduction in the leaf area per plant and possibly the hydration of the plants in the night through enhanced root growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Bates LM, Hall AE (1981) Stomatal closure with soil water depletion not associated with changes in bulk water status. Oecologia (Berlin) 50:62–65

  2. Bates LM, Hall AE (1982) Relationships between leaf water status and transpiration of cowpea with progressive soil drying. Oecologia (Berlin) 53:285–289

  3. Brouwer R (1981) Effects of environmental conditions on root functioning. Acta Hortic 119:91–101

  4. Clark RM, Hiler EA (1973) Plant measurements as indicators of crop water deficit. Crop Sci 13:466–469

  5. Elfving DC, Kaufmann MR, Hall AE (1972) Interpreting leaf water potential measurements with a model of the soil-plant-atmosphere continum. Physiol Plant 27:161–168

  6. Fischer RA, Turner NC (1978) Plant productivity in the arid and semi arid zones. Ann Rev Plant Physiol 29:277–317

  7. Gaff DF, Carr DJ (1961) The quantity of water in the cell wall and its significance. Aust J Biol Sci 14:299–311

  8. Hall AE, Schulze E-D (1980) Drought effects on transpiration and leaf water status of cowpea in controlled environments. Aust J Plant Physiol 7:141–147

  9. Hsiao TC, Acevedo F, Fereres E, Henderson DW (1976) Water stress, growth and osmotic adjustment. Phil Trans R Soc London B 273:479–500

  10. Kowalik PJ, Turner NC (1983) Diurnal changes in the water relations and transpiration of a soybean crop simulated during the development of water deficits. Irrig Sci 4:225–238

  11. Mansfield TA, Davies WJ (1981) Stomata and stomatal mechanisms. In: Aspinall D, Paley LG (eds) Physiology and biochemistry of drought resistance. Academic Press, Australia, pp 315–346

  12. Nagarajah S, Schulze E-D (1983) Responses of Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. to atmospheric and soil drought. Aust J Plant Physiol 10:385–394

  13. Osonubi O, Davies WJ (1981) Root growth and water relations of oak and birch seedlings. Oecologia (Berlin) 51:343–350

  14. Scholander PF, Hammel HT, Bradstreet ED, Hemmingsen EA (1965) Sap pressure in vascular plants Science 148:339–346

  15. Schulze E-D, Hall AE (1982) Stomatal responses, water loss and CO2 assimilation rates of plants in contrasting environments. In: Lange OL, Nobel PS, Osmond CB, Ziegler H (eds) Physiological Plant Ecology II. Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology Vol 12B. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 181–230

  16. Schulze E-D, Hall AE, Lange OL, Walz H (1982) A portable steady-state porometer for measuring the carbon dioxide and water vapour exchanges of leaves under natural conditions. Oecologia (Berlin) 53:141–145

  17. Schulze E-D, Schilling K, Nagarajah S (1983) Carbohydrate partitioning in relation to whole plant production and water use of Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. Oecologia (Berlin) 58:169–177

  18. Shackel KA, Hall AE (1983) Comparison of water relations and osmotic adjustment in sorghum and cowpea under field conditions. Aust J Plant Physiol 10:423–435

  19. Sharp RE, Osonubi O, Wood WA, Davies WJ (1979) A simple instrument for measuring leaf extension in grasses and its application in the study of the effects of water stress on maize and sorghum. Ann Bot 44:35–45

  20. Tennant D (1975) A test of a modified line intercept method of estimating root length. J Ecol 63:995–1001

  21. Turk KJ, Hall AE (1980) Drought adaptation of cowpea. II. Influence of drought on water status and relations with seed yield. Agron J 72:421–427

  22. Turner NC, Schulze E-D, Gollan T (1984) The responses of stomata and leaf gas exchange to vapour pressure deficits and soil water content. II. In the mesophytic herbaceous species Helianthus annuus. Oecologia (Berlin) (In press)

  23. Tyree MT, Jarvis PG (1982) Water in tissues and cells. In: Lange OL, Nobel PS, Osmond CB, Ziegler H (eds) Physiological Plant Ecology II. Encyclopaedia of Plant Physiology Vol 12B Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 35–77

Download references

Author information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Osonubi, O. Responses of cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) to progressive soil drought. Oecologia 66, 554–557 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379349

Download citation

Keywords

  • Hydration
  • Leaf Area
  • Root Growth
  • Water Potential
  • Stomatal Conductance