Oecologia

, Volume 71, Issue 4, pp 501–509 | Cite as

Reproductive success, spontaneous embryo abortion, and genetic load in flowering plants

  • D. Wiens
  • C. L. Calvin
  • C. A. Wilson
  • C. I. Davern
  • D. Frank
  • S. R. Seavey
Original Papers

Summary

Reproductive success is divided into two phases: preemergent (the number of viable seeds that enter the ambient environment) and postemergent (the percentage of progeny that survive to reproduce). We studied preemergent reproductive success (PERS) in flowering plants by measuring the fruit/flower (Fr/Fl) ratio and the seed/ovule (S/O) ratio in a number of species of outcrossing and inbreeding plants, where PERS=the product of (Fr/Fl) and (S/O). In order to determine the influence of the ambient environment (including resource availability) we studied pairs of outcrossing and inbreeding species occurring in the same habitat. Among outcrossing species PERS averaged about 22%, whereas in inbreeding species the average was approximately 90%. The progeny/zygote (P/Z) ratio was studied in hand-pollinated populations in Epilobium angustifolium (a strongly outcrossing species) from populations in Oregon and Utah, by direct observation of embryogenesis at twoday intervals throughout the course of seed development. The P/Z ratio in both populations averaged near 30%, and the developing embryos showed a surprising array of abnormalities that resulted in embryo death. During early development >95% of the ovules had normally developing globular embryos, but beginning with differentiation (cotyledon formation) about 70% of the original globular embryos aborted during the course of embryogenesis and seed development. The clustering of developmental lethals during peroids of major differentiation events parallels the animal model of development. We found little evidence that PERS was limited by the ambient environment (including resource availability), pollination, or factors associated with the inbreeding habit. Instead, PERS was found to be inextricably linked to outcrossing plants, whose breeding systems promote genetic variability. The high incidence of developmental lethals in E. angustifolium and the resulting low P/Z ratio (ca. 30%) is attributed to genetic load (any lethal mutation or allelic combination) possibly working in combination with developmental selection (interovarian competition among genetically diverse embryos). Examples of maternally controlled, fixed patterns of ovule abortion with respect to position or number are discussed. However, we found no need to employ “female choice” as a hypothesis to explain our results for the extensive, seemingly random patterns of embryo abortion in E. angustifolium and other outcrossing species. A more parsimonious, mechanistic explanation based on genetic load-developmental selection is sufficient to account for the differential survivorship of embryos. Likewise, the traditional concept of a positive growth regulator feedback system based on the number of surviving ovules in an ovary can account for subsequent fruit survivorship.

Key words

Epilobium Fruit/flower ratio Seed/ovule ratio Progeny/Zygote ratio 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Apirion D, Zohary D (1961) Chlorophyll lethals in natural populations of orchard grass (Dactylis glomerata L.): a case of balanced polymorphism in plants. Genetics 46:393–399Google Scholar
  2. Bertin RI (1982) Paternity and fruit production in trumpet creeper (Campsis radicans). Am Nat 119:694–709Google Scholar
  3. Biggers JD (1981) In vitro fertilization and embryo transfer in human beings. New Engl J Med 304:336–342Google Scholar
  4. Bradbury D (1929) A comparative study of the developing and aborting fruits of Prunus cerasus. Amer J Bot 16:525–542Google Scholar
  5. Brambell FWR (1948) Prenatal mortality in mammals. Biol Rev 23:370–407Google Scholar
  6. Browder LW (1984) Developmental Biology. Saunders, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Buchholz JT (1922) Developmental selection in vascular plants. Bot Gaz 73:249–286Google Scholar
  8. Casper BB (1983) The efficiency of pollen transfer and rates of embryo initiation in Cryptantha (Boraginaceae). Oecologia (Berl) 59:262–268Google Scholar
  9. Casper BB, Wiens D (1981) Fixed rates of random ovule abortion in Cryptantha flava (Boraginaceae) and its possible relation to seed dispersal. Ecology 62:866–869Google Scholar
  10. Charnov E (1979) Simultaneous hermaphroditism and sexual selection. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 76:2480–2484Google Scholar
  11. Cooper DC, Brink RA, Albrecht HR (1937) Embryo mortality in relation to seed formation in alfalfa (Medicago sativa). Amer J Bot 24:203–213Google Scholar
  12. Essau K (1977) Anatomy of Seed Plants. John Wiley & Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Flint EP (1980) Ecology and distribution of diploid and tetraploid Epilobium angustifolium (fireweed) in the Beartooth Mountains of Wyoming and Montana. Ph.D. Thesis, Duke UniversityGoogle Scholar
  14. Hadorn E (1961) Developmental genetics and lethal factors. Translated by V. Mittwoch, Methuen and Co Ltd., LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Haldane JBS (1957) The cost of natural selection. J Genetics 55:511–524Google Scholar
  16. Herr JM, Jr (1974) A clearing-squash technique for the study of ovule and megagametophyte development in Angiosperms. In: Radford AE, Dickinson WC, Massey JR, Bell CR (eds) Vascular Plant Systematics. Harper & Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Horovitz A, Meiri L, Beilles A (1976) Effects of ovule positions in fabaceous flowers on seed set and outcrossing rates. Bot Gaz 137:250–254Google Scholar
  18. Janzen DH (1977) A note on optimal mate selection by plants. Amer Nat 111:365–371Google Scholar
  19. Johri BM (1963) Female gametophyte. In: Maheshwari P (ed) Recent Advances in the Embryology of Angiosperms, pp 59–103. International Soc of Plant Morph, DelhiGoogle Scholar
  20. Klekowski EJ, Jr, Kazarinova-Fukshansky N, Mohr H (1985) Shoot apical meristems and mutations: stratified meristems and angiosperm evolution. Amer J Bot 72:1788–1800Google Scholar
  21. Lee TD (1984) Patterns of fruit maturation: a gametophyte competition hypothesis. Amer Nat 123:427–432Google Scholar
  22. Marsden MPF, Meinke DW (1985) Abnormal development of the suspensor in an embryo-lethal mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana. Amer J Bot 72:1801–1812Google Scholar
  23. Marshall DL, Ellstrand NC (1986) Sexual selection in Raphanus sativa: experimental data on non random fertilization, maternal choice, and consequences of multiple paternity. Amer Nat 127:446–461Google Scholar
  24. Meinke DW, Sussex IM (1979) Isolation and characterization of six embryo-lethal mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana. Dev Biol 72:50–61Google Scholar
  25. Meinke DW (1985) Embryo-lethal mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana with a wide range of lethal phases. Theor Appl Genet 69:543–552Google Scholar
  26. Mosquin T (1966) A new taxonomy for Epilobium angustifolium (Onagraceae). Brittonia: 167–188Google Scholar
  27. Mulcahy DL (1978) Further evidence that gametophytic selection modifies the genetic quality of the sporophyte. Soc Bot Fr Actualites Bot n1–2:57–60 (references therein)Google Scholar
  28. Muller HJ (1950) Our load of mutations. Amer J Human Genetics 2:111–176Google Scholar
  29. Muller HJ (1964) The relation of recombination to mutational advance. Mutat Res 1:2–9Google Scholar
  30. Sang JH (1984) Genetics and Development. Longman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Schoen DJ (1981) The evolution of self-pollination in Gilia achilleifolia (Polemoniaceae). Ph. D. thesis, Univ Cal, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  32. Schoen DJ (1982) Genetic variation and the breeding system of Gilia achilleifolia. Evolution 36:361–370Google Scholar
  33. Seavey SR, Bawa KS (1986) Delayed self-incompatibility in Angiosperms. Bot Rev 52:195–219Google Scholar
  34. Sheridan WF, Neuffer MG (1982) Maize development mutants, embryos unable to form leaf primordia. J Heredity 73:318–329Google Scholar
  35. Sorensen F (1969) Embryonic load in coastal douglas-fir, Pseudotsuga menziesii var. menziesii. Amer Nat 119:694–709Google Scholar
  36. Stephenson AG (1981) Flower and fruit abortion: proximate causes and ultimate functions. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 12:253–279Google Scholar
  37. Stephenson AG, Bertin RI (1983) Male competition, female choice, and sexual selection in plants. L.A. Real (ed) Pollination Biology, Academic Press, NYGoogle Scholar
  38. Stephenson AG, Winsor JA (1986) Lotus corniculatus regulates offspring quality through selective fruit abortion. Evolution 40:453–458Google Scholar
  39. Sutherland S (1986) Patterns of fruit-set: what controls fruit-flower ratios in plants. Evolution 40:117–128Google Scholar
  40. Vickery RK (1978) Case studies in the evolution of species complexes in Mimulus. In: Hecht MK, Steere WC, Wallace B (eds) Evolutionary Biology 11:405–407, Plenum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  41. Waser NM, Price MV (1983) Optimal and actual outcrossing in plants, and the nature of the plant-pollinator interaction. In: Jones CE, Little RJ (eds) Handbook of Experimental Pollination Biology, pp 341–359. Van Nostrand Rheinold, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  42. Wiens D (1984) Ovule survivorship, brood size, life history, breeding systems and reproductive success in plants. Oecologia (Berl) 64:47–53Google Scholar
  43. Wilson MF (1979) Sexual selection in plants. Amer Nat 113:777–790Google Scholar
  44. Willson MF, Burley N (1983) Mate choice in plants. Princeton Univ Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Wiens
    • 1
  • C. L. Calvin
    • 2
  • C. A. Wilson
    • 2
  • C. I. Davern
    • 1
  • D. Frank
    • 3
  • S. R. Seavey
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biology and Department of ChemistryPortland State UniversityPortlandUSA
  3. 3.Department of BiologySyracuse UniversitySyracuseUSA
  4. 4.Department of BiologyLewis and Clark CollegePortlandUSA

Personalised recommendations