Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Pocket gophers (Geomys bursarius), vegetation, and soil nitrogen along a successional sere in east central Minnesota

  • 190 Accesses

  • 119 Citations

Summary

Pocket gophers (Geomys bursarius: Geomyidae Rodentia) are shown to affect soil resources and thus, indirectly, vegetation. Gophers reduce average soil nitrogen near the surface and increase point-to-point heterogeneity of soil nitrogen by moving nitrogen-poor subsurface soil to the soil surface. Data from 22 old fields at Cedar Creek Natural History Area, Minnesota, USA show correlations of soil nitrogen, vegetation, and gopher mounds that are consistent with this indirect mechanism by which gophers affect local species composition and old field succession.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Andersen DC, MacMahon JA (1985) Plant succession following the Mount St. Helens volcanic eruption: facilitation by a burrowing rodent, Thomomys talpoides. Am Mid Nat 114:62–69

  2. Armesto JJ, Pickett STA (1985) Experiments on disturbance in old-field plant communities: impact on species richness and abundance. Ecology 66:230–240

  3. Chew RM (1974) Consumers as regulators of ecosystems: an alternative view to energetics. Ohio J Sci 74:359–370

  4. Chew RM (1978) The impact of small mammals on ecosystem structure and function. In: Snyder DP (ed) Populations of small mammals under natural conditions. University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA, pp 167–180

  5. Grant WE, French NR, Folse LJ, Jr (1980) Effects of pocket gopher mounds on plant production in shortgrass prairie ecosystems. The Southwestern Naturalist 25:215–224

  6. Grigal DF, Chamberlain LM, Finney HR, Wroblewski DV, Gross ER (1974) Soils of the Cedar Creek Natural History Area. Miscellaneous Report 123, University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA

  7. Gross KL, Werner PA (1982) Colonizing abilities of “biennial” plant species in relation to ground cover: implications for their distributions in a successional sere. Ecology 63:921–931

  8. Inouye RS, Huntly NJ, Tilman D, Tester JR, Zinnel KC, Stilwell M (1987) Succession on a Minnesota sand plain. Ecology 68:12–26

  9. Laycock WA, Richardson BZ (1975) Long-term effects of pocket gopher control on vegetation and soils of a subalpine grassland. J Range Manage 28(6):458–462

  10. Lehman JT (1980) Nutrient recycling as an interface between algae and grazers in freshwater communities. In: Kerfoot WC (ed) Evolution and ecology of zooplankton communities. University Press of New England, New Hampshire, pp 251–263

  11. MacMahon JA (1981) Successional processes: comparisons among biomes with special reference to probable roles of and influences on animals. In: West DC, Shugart HH, Botkin DB (eds) Forest succession. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 277–304

  12. Platt WJ (1975) The colonization and formation of equilibrium plant species associations on badger disturbances in a tall-grass prairie. Ecol Monogr 45:285–305

  13. Reichman OJ, Smith SC (1985) Impact of pocket gopher burrows on overlying vegetation. J of Mammal 66:720–725

  14. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1969) Biometry. Freeman, San Francisco

  15. Spencer SR, Cameron GN, Eshelman BD, Cooper LC, Williams LR (1985) Influence of pocket gopher mounds on a Texas coastal prairie. Oecologia (Berlin) 66:111–115

  16. Sterner RW (1986) Herbivores' direct and indirect effects on algal populations. Science 231:605–607

  17. Tilman D (1982) Resource Competition and Community Structure. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

  18. Tilman D (1983) Plant succession and gopher disturbance along an experimental gradient. Oecologia (Berlin) 60:285–292

  19. Tilman D (1984) Plant dominance along an experimental nutrient gradient. Ecology 65:1445–1453

  20. Tilman D (1985) The resource-ratio hypothesis of plant succession. Am Nat 125:827–852

  21. Tilman D (1987) Secondary succession and the pattern of plant dominance along experimental nitrogen gradients. Ecology (in press)

  22. Turner GT (1969) Responses of mountain grassland vegetation to gopher control, reduced grazing, and herbicide. J Range Manage 22:377–383

  23. Woodmansee RG (1978) Additions and losses of nitrogen in grassland ecosystems. Biol Science 28:448–453

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to R. S. Inouye.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Inouye, R.S., Huntly, N.J., Tilman, D. et al. Pocket gophers (Geomys bursarius), vegetation, and soil nitrogen along a successional sere in east central Minnesota. Oecologia 72, 178–184 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379264

Download citation

Key words

  • Geomys
  • Soil nitrogen
  • Gopher mounds
  • Succession